Ranking the best players in the NCAA men's basketball transfer portal (2024)

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 210

DeVries will likely remain the best player in the portal, and it’s obvious where he’ll be headed. The two-time Missouri Valley Player of the Year is a genuine NBA prospect and a player who keeps improving every year.

This season, his playmaking in ball screens took an enormous leap. DeVries made a killing as a sophom*ore running off all sorts of off-ball actions designed to get him open from long range. This season, DeVries became the primary playmaker for a Bulldogs team that won 28 games on their way to making a second straight NCAA Tournament. DeVries crushed it in ball-screens, especially on early drag actions that got him loose for 3. Plus, Drake still used him off the ball with flare and pindown screens, too.

The combination of DeVries’ dynamic on- and off-ball play made him one of college basketball’s most lethal offensive players. He averaged 21.6 points, 6.7 rebounds and 3.7 assists per game while drilling 36.3 percent of one of the most difficult 3-point shot diets in the country. He drilled 46 percent of his pull-up 3s this season, an absurd percentage. He’s extremely well-rounded and almost impossible to stop.

Tucker’s father, Darian DeVries, is the reason he played for Drake instead of a high major when he was a four-star, top-100 prospect coming out of high school. Now that Darian is headed to coach West Virginia, Tucker will follow him to Morgantown.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 210

DeVries will likely remain the best player in the portal, and it’s obvious where he’ll be headed. The two-time Missouri Valley Player of the Year is a genuine NBA prospect and a player who keeps improving every year.

This season, his playmaking in ball screens took an enormous leap. DeVries made a killing as a sophom*ore running off all sorts of off-ball actions designed to get him open from long range. This season, DeVries became the primary playmaker for a Bulldogs team that won 28 games on their way to making a second straight NCAA Tournament. DeVries crushed it in ball-screens, especially on early drag actions that got him loose for 3. Plus, Drake still used him off the ball with flare and pindown screens, too.

The combination of DeVries’ dynamic on- and off-ball play made him one of college basketball’s most lethal offensive players. He averaged 21.6 points, 6.7 rebounds and 3.7 assists per game while drilling 36.3 percent of one of the most difficult 3-point shot diets in the country. He drilled 46 percent of his pull-up 3s this season, an absurd percentage. He’s extremely well-rounded and almost impossible to stop.

Tucker’s father, Darian DeVries, is the reason he played for Drake instead of a high major when he was a four-star, top-100 prospect coming out of high school. Now that Darian is headed to coach West Virginia, Tucker will follow him to Morgantown.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 203

Davis is testing the NBA Draft waters again for the second straight year while also entering the portal. Davis is a worker who went from averaging 3.2 points per game as a freshman to averaging 18.2 as a senior and being named the co-American Athletic Conference Player of the Year. He is one of the best scorers in the portal and has turned himself into an elite shooter, knocking down 41.4 percent of his 3s this past season. He plays bigger than his size and is a strong outside-of-his area rebounder, averaging 6.3 boards per game.

After playing on a balanced scoring team during FAU’s 2023 Final Four run, Davis showed this season he could be a high-usage scorer. He’s good off the catch, and as a righty who prefers to drive left, he also can put the ball on the floor to score at all three levels. He was at his best in big games, averaging 20.8 points against the six high majors on FAU’s schedule and scoring a season-high 35 points against Arizona. Davis is also a willing passer when he gets downhill. He’s always been turnover-prone, which is partly due to his aggressiveness.

He will be a target for high majors looking for a perimeter scorer. The possibility of Davis following coach Dusty May to Michigan is an obvious one. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 203

Davis is testing the NBA Draft waters again for the second straight year while also entering the portal. Davis is a worker who went from averaging 3.2 points per game as a freshman to averaging 18.2 as a senior and being named the co-American Athletic Conference Player of the Year. He is one of the best scorers in the portal and has turned himself into an elite shooter, knocking down 41.4 percent of his 3s this past season. He plays bigger than his size and is a strong outside-of-his area rebounder, averaging 6.3 boards per game.

After playing on a balanced scoring team during FAU’s 2023 Final Four run, Davis showed this season he could be a high-usage scorer. He’s good off the catch, and as a righty who prefers to drive left, he also can put the ball on the floor to score at all three levels. He was at his best in big games, averaging 20.8 points against the six high majors on FAU’s schedule and scoring a season-high 35 points against Arizona. Davis is also a willing passer when he gets downhill. He’s always been turnover-prone, which is partly due to his aggressiveness.

He will be a target for high majors looking for a perimeter scorer. The possibility of Davis following coach Dusty May to Michigan is an obvious one. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-10Wt: 240

Avila is an awesome offensive talent and limited defender. He is a 6-foot-10 point guard who can also wreck in the low post. He has every offensive skill: ballhandling, passing, shooting and a low-post game. His feel is elite. It doesn’t really matter that he’s slow on the offensive end, because he has a killer shot fake that often gives him a step and he can also overpower defenders with Barkleys. He’s going to get to his spots. Indiana State built everything around Avila, who put up some of the best efficiency numbers in college basketball. He averaged 17.4 points while shooting 39.4 percent from 3, making 62 percent of his 2s and 80.8 percent at the free-throw line.

He proved in the NIT that his game translates to higher levels, going for 11 points and seven assists against Minnesota, then 22 points and six assists against Cincinnati, then 26 points and three assists against Utah and finally 13 points and five assists in the final against Seton Hall.

Defensively, Avila knows where to be, but his foot speed and lack of jumping ability limits how you can play on that end. Indiana State played Avila in drop coverage and tried to keep everything in front. He does a good job of not fouling — 3.4 fouls per 40 — but Indiana State’s defense ranked 114th in adjusted efficiency. There’s a ceiling there, but he was also the hub of one of the best offenses in the country. He reminds me a lot of Georges Niang, the former Iowa State big who helped lead the Cyclones to two Sweet 16s and was the hub of a top-12 offense in all four of his seasons in Ames. The Sycamores, in case you were wondering, ranked 13th in adjusted offense this year.

— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 250

The Mountain West Player of the Year has hit the portal, an expected outcome following coach Danny Sprinkle's departure to Washington. Osobor followed Sprinkle from Montana State to Utah State this past season and went from the Big Sky Sixth Man of the Year to the top player in the Mountain West. He averaged 17.7 points per game while grabbing nine rebounds, dishing out 2.8 assists and blocking over one shot per game.

Almost everything comes around the basket for Osobor, specifically with his back to the basket. Osobor averaged more post possessions per game this season than all but five players nationally, per Synergy. His effectiveness came as part of a Utah State offense that wasn’t loaded with shot creators or outside shooters.

Osobor is terrific at establishing post position deep in the paint. He uses his lack of height to his advantage, getting lower than his man to gain leverage and keep space. He’s also really sharp at keeping his dribble alive to create an angle, then exploding toward the rim with jump stops and other moves. He’ll deploy well-timed drop stops to get to layups or dunks, or work toward quick floaters over the top of bigs. He has good touch around the rim, making about 63 percent of his attempts around the basket, per Synergy.

But Osobor does more than just post. He corralled more than 10 percent of his team’s misses with either put-backs or tip-outs. He has an excellent understanding of passing angles and can make sharp reads from a standstill position or on the move. He excelled at finding cutters himself and was really capable as a playmaker going in either direction. His hands are enormous, and he has full control over the ball while making his moves.

Osobor is a center, and there are some inherent defensive limitations that come when a 6-foot-8 person plays that position. He moves well enough on the perimeter to run different defensive coverages, and he’s a willing, physical player on the interior. But Utah State struggled to stop anyone at the rim this past season, which was ultimately the reason they were eliminated by Purdue in the NCAA Tournament. That weakness does make me slightly question Osobor's potential would be at the high-major level.

Nevertheless, he’s earned the right to give it a go. It’ll be intriguing to see if he follows Sprinkle again and heads to Washington. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 250

The Mountain West Player of the Year has hit the portal, an expected outcome following coach Danny Sprinkle's departure to Washington. Osobor followed Sprinkle from Montana State to Utah State this past season and went from the Big Sky Sixth Man of the Year to the top player in the Mountain West. He averaged 17.7 points per game while grabbing nine rebounds, dishing out 2.8 assists and blocking over one shot per game.

Almost everything comes around the basket for Osobor, specifically with his back to the basket. Osobor averaged more post possessions per game this season than all but five players nationally, per Synergy. His effectiveness came as part of a Utah State offense that wasn’t loaded with shot creators or outside shooters.

Osobor is terrific at establishing post position deep in the paint. He uses his lack of height to his advantage, getting lower than his man to gain leverage and keep space. He’s also really sharp at keeping his dribble alive to create an angle, then exploding toward the rim with jump stops and other moves. He’ll deploy well-timed drop stops to get to layups or dunks, or work toward quick floaters over the top of bigs. He has good touch around the rim, making about 63 percent of his attempts around the basket, per Synergy.

But Osobor does more than just post. He corralled more than 10 percent of his team’s misses with either put-backs or tip-outs. He has an excellent understanding of passing angles and can make sharp reads from a standstill position or on the move. He excelled at finding cutters himself and was really capable as a playmaker going in either direction. His hands are enormous, and he has full control over the ball while making his moves.

Osobor is a center, and there are some inherent defensive limitations that come when a 6-foot-8 person plays that position. He moves well enough on the perimeter to run different defensive coverages, and he’s a willing, physical player on the interior. But Utah State struggled to stop anyone at the rim this past season, which was ultimately the reason they were eliminated by Purdue in the NCAA Tournament. That weakness does make me slightly question Osobor's potential would be at the high-major level.

Nevertheless, he’s earned the right to give it a go. It’ll be intriguing to see if he follows Sprinkle again and heads to Washington. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6Wt: 190

Griffen is a plug-and-play wing because of his ability to shoot the ball. He made 74 3s this season at a 39.2 percent clip. He’s elite as a spot-up shooter. The release is quick and high. He can also make shots off the move, but most of his 3s come off spot-ups. He’s limited as an athlete but seems to realize his limitations and play to his strengths. He almost always plays off two feet and still shoots it well at the rim, helped by his size. He shot 64.3 percent at the rim, per Synergy. He’s right-handed dominant — so he usually drives right — and not the type to shake defenders off the bounce. Most of his points come on jumpers. Go behind a dribble handoff or ball screen, and he’s pulling it. He shot more 3s (189) than 2s (102). He’s been well-schooled in how to play efficient basketball, hunting 3s and being willing to make the extra pass if the shot isn’t there for him. He made eight 3s in the Sweet 16 game against North Carolina and then followed that up with eight assists in the Elite Eight against Clemson. This is a surprising one because he’s such a good fit in Alabama’s system and started 33 games this season. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-6Wt: 190

Griffen is a plug-and-play wing because of his ability to shoot the ball. He made 74 3s this season at a 39.2 percent clip. He’s elite as a spot-up shooter. The release is quick and high. He can also make shots off the move, but most of his 3s come off spot-ups. He’s limited as an athlete but seems to realize his limitations and play to his strengths. He almost always plays off two feet and still shoots it well at the rim, helped by his size. He shot 64.3 percent at the rim, per Synergy. He’s right-handed dominant — so he usually drives right — and not the type to shake defenders off the bounce. Most of his points come on jumpers. Go behind a dribble handoff or ball screen, and he’s pulling it. He shot more 3s (189) than 2s (102). He’s been well-schooled in how to play efficient basketball, hunting 3s and being willing to make the extra pass if the shot isn’t there for him. He made eight 3s in the Sweet 16 game against North Carolina and then followed that up with eight assists in the Elite Eight against Clemson. This is a surprising one because he’s such a good fit in Alabama’s system and started 33 games this season. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

A redshirt freshman who played six games last year at TCU before transferring, Haggerty moved to Tulsa and immediately was the most dominant freshman in the AAC. He won the AAC’s Rookie of the Year award and was third-team All-ACC in a vote that made very little sense. Haggerty finished second in scoring in the league overall but first in conference play.

There were not five better players in the AAC this year. Honestly, I’m not convinced there was a better player by the end of the season, as over his last 17 games, Haggerty averaged 24 points, six rebounds and 4.2 assists on a nearly two-to-one assist-to-turnover ratio. No player in the country is better at drawing fouls. Haggerty averaged 10 free throw attempts per game this season, as his deceleration step around the rim and ability to absorb contact is elite. He’s strong and capable of using his shoulders to shrug off defenders once he gets an angle on them as they try to recover.

Everything for him is based on that ability to get to the rim. Haggerty is going to press the issue in transition, where he’ll try to attack with aggression and get to the rim. Then, in halfcourt settings, he’ll hunt ball screens and attack out of those and attempt to get all the way to the rim. If he doesn’t get there, he’s going to stop in the midrange for a little floater, shots on which he nearly made half of his attempts. Sometimes he’ll take a pull-up jumper in the midrange, too, although the jumper is by far the piece of the equation that needs the most work.

Haggerty made just three of his 30 pull-up 3-point attempts this year, per Synergy. However, he did make shots off the catch at a 39 percent clip from 3. The touch is there, as can be seen by his finishing craft on his floaters. And he’s not wildly selfish, either. Haggerty isn’t an elite passer, but he’s a good one. If you blitz him, he’ll find the open man. He reads the court well. Given that he has three years left, I think there is a real case Haggerty is the best player in the portal. He’s going to be an elite college scorer for as long as he’s at the level, and he’ll do so at any level.

— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

A redshirt freshman who played six games last year at TCU before transferring, Haggerty moved to Tulsa and immediately was the most dominant freshman in the AAC. He won the AAC’s Rookie of the Year award and was third-team All-ACC in a vote that made very little sense. Haggerty finished second in scoring in the league overall but first in conference play.

There were not five better players in the AAC this year. Honestly, I’m not convinced there was a better player by the end of the season, as over his last 17 games, Haggerty averaged 24 points, six rebounds and 4.2 assists on a nearly two-to-one assist-to-turnover ratio. No player in the country is better at drawing fouls. Haggerty averaged 10 free throw attempts per game this season, as his deceleration step around the rim and ability to absorb contact is elite. He’s strong and capable of using his shoulders to shrug off defenders once he gets an angle on them as they try to recover.

Everything for him is based on that ability to get to the rim. Haggerty is going to press the issue in transition, where he’ll try to attack with aggression and get to the rim. Then, in halfcourt settings, he’ll hunt ball screens and attack out of those and attempt to get all the way to the rim. If he doesn’t get there, he’s going to stop in the midrange for a little floater, shots on which he nearly made half of his attempts. Sometimes he’ll take a pull-up jumper in the midrange, too, although the jumper is by far the piece of the equation that needs the most work.

Haggerty made just three of his 30 pull-up 3-point attempts this year, per Synergy. However, he did make shots off the catch at a 39 percent clip from 3. The touch is there, as can be seen by his finishing craft on his floaters. And he’s not wildly selfish, either. Haggerty isn’t an elite passer, but he’s a good one. If you blitz him, he’ll find the open man. He reads the court well. Given that he has three years left, I think there is a real case Haggerty is the best player in the portal. He’s going to be an elite college scorer for as long as he’s at the level, and he’ll do so at any level.

— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Haggerty is an enormous get for Memphis, although I am a bit disappointed we won't see him in a stronger top-to-bottom conference. We've already seen him dominate the American — he averaged 23.4 points per game in 18 AAC games last season for Tulsa.

The Tigers' roster at the time of Haggerty's commitment is fluid. Forward Nick Jourdain, who started 25 games last season, will be back and useful as a floor-spacing forward on Haggerty’s foul-drawing drives. But coach Penny Hardaway is still waiting on David Jones, the 21-points-per-game wing scorer seen as likely to at least test the NBA Draft waters. If Memphis gets Jones back to pair with Haggerty, it'd have a real chance to be in the top-25.

Still, Haggety’s commitment alone has the Tigers' offseason off to a strong start. He gives them a genuine building block who could be there long-term. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 170

Mack was arguably the most productive freshman guard in the country this season. The Prince George’s County, Md. native averaged 17.2 points, four rebounds, 4.8 assists and 1.3 steals per game, though his 3-point percentage tailed off in the latter stages of Ivy League play. Still, he was a deserved Ivy League Rookie of the Year, and his play at such a young age in what was a strong season for the conference was remarkable.

The lefty guard can score from all three levels in the pick-and-roll. If he cannot find an easy bucket in transition, he’ll quickly use a ball screen to try to get into the teeth of the defense. He attempted about three shots at the rim per game in halfcourt situations this season, per Synergy, and used an occasional floater or pull-up midrange jumper as a counter. When opponents went under his screens, he comfortably stopped and popped from distance, making about one pull-up 3 per game.

But Mack is especially appealing for a high-major school because he combines that skill with a strong off-ball game. Harvard used him to attack off the catch a fair amount last season, allowing him to generate spot-up 3s, midrange jumpers or drives all the way to the rim when opponents closed out aggressively. His combination of speed and shake off the dribble is hard to stop once he gets a head of steam.

On top of all that, Mack can really pass. He’s excellent at drawing defenders to him before hitting his roller with a variety of pocket passes and lobs. He’s comfortable playing off two feet, with a poised, patient style.

Many scouts see Mack as a potential NBA player, and I bet he’ll make an all-conference team as an upperclassman. Every school in the Washington, D.C. area should be checking in, as should just about everyone nationally. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 170

Mack was arguably the most productive freshman guard in the country this season. The Prince George’s County, Md. native averaged 17.2 points, four rebounds, 4.8 assists and 1.3 steals per game, though his 3-point percentage tailed off in the latter stages of Ivy League play. Still, he was a deserved Ivy League Rookie of the Year, and his play at such a young age in what was a strong season for the conference was remarkable.

The lefty guard can score from all three levels in the pick-and-roll. If he cannot find an easy bucket in transition, he’ll quickly use a ball screen to try to get into the teeth of the defense. He attempted about three shots at the rim per game in halfcourt situations this season, per Synergy, and used an occasional floater or pull-up midrange jumper as a counter. When opponents went under his screens, he comfortably stopped and popped from distance, making about one pull-up 3 per game.

But Mack is especially appealing for a high-major school because he combines that skill with a strong off-ball game. Harvard used him to attack off the catch a fair amount last season, allowing him to generate spot-up 3s, midrange jumpers or drives all the way to the rim when opponents closed out aggressively. His combination of speed and shake off the dribble is hard to stop once he gets a head of steam.

On top of all that, Mack can really pass. He’s excellent at drawing defenders to him before hitting his roller with a variety of pocket passes and lobs. He’s comfortable playing off two feet, with a poised, patient style.

Many scouts see Mack as a potential NBA player, and I bet he’ll make an all-conference team as an upperclassman. Every school in the Washington, D.C. area should be checking in, as should just about everyone nationally. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 180

Rice arrived at Washington State in 2021 and decided to redshirt in order to maintain eligibility. Then before the 2022-23 season, he was diagnosed with Hodgkin Lymphoma and took a medical redshirt to recover, getting cleared to play again in June 2023. From the moment he stepped on the court, it was all systems go. He won first-team All-Pac-12 and the Pac-12 Rookie of the Year, leading Washington State to the NCAA Tournament and a second-place finish in the league while averaging 14.8 points and 3.8 assists per game.

Rice can pass, but his tendency right now is to get downhill and be a scorer. He plays at his own pace, utilizing hang dribbles to keep himself alive. From there, everything is available to him at all three levels. He’s extremely comfortable pulling up from midrange and from 3, although his shooting percentages in both areas were quite poor. Rice thrives when he can get all the way to the rim, where his 62 percent mark (per Synergy) was very strong for a high-major guard. He also showed some ability to play off the ball.

Rice only hit 27.5 percent of his 3s this season despite making 81 percent of his foul shots. There’s nothing clearly wrong with the shot, and he has good touch. If he starts hitting at around 35 percent from distance, he’ll be one of the best guards in the country next season. He could play at any program in the country, but it’ll be interesting to see whether he follows his coach Kyle Smith from Washington State to Stanford. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 180

Rice arrived at Washington State in 2021 and decided to redshirt in order to maintain eligibility. Then before the 2022-23 season, he was diagnosed with Hodgkin Lymphoma and took a medical redshirt to recover, getting cleared to play again in June 2023. From the moment he stepped on the court, it was all systems go. He won first-team All-Pac-12 and the Pac-12 Rookie of the Year, leading Washington State to the NCAA Tournament and a second-place finish in the league while averaging 14.8 points and 3.8 assists per game.

Rice can pass, but his tendency right now is to get downhill and be a scorer. He plays at his own pace, utilizing hang dribbles to keep himself alive. From there, everything is available to him at all three levels. He’s extremely comfortable pulling up from midrange and from 3, although his shooting percentages in both areas were quite poor. Rice thrives when he can get all the way to the rim, where his 62 percent mark (per Synergy) was very strong for a high-major guard. He also showed some ability to play off the ball.

Rice only hit 27.5 percent of his 3s this season despite making 81 percent of his foul shots. There’s nothing clearly wrong with the shot, and he has good touch. If he starts hitting at around 35 percent from distance, he’ll be one of the best guards in the country next season. He could play at any program in the country, but it’ll be interesting to see whether he follows his coach Kyle Smith from Washington State to Stanford. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 195

Conwell came out of nowhere to become one of the best mid-major guards in the country. He went from averaging 5.1 points per game, making 27 3s and shooting 30 percent from distance as a freshman at South Florida to averaging 16.6 points, making 104 3s at a 40.7 percent clip and averaging 5.8 rebounds and 2.5 assists at Indiana State as a sophom*ore. The lefty is the ideal guard in the modern game. Every one of his shots this season was a 3 or a layup, and his efficiency numbers were picturesque: 61.3 percent on 2s, 85.5 percent at the free-throw line (on 3.4 attempts per game) and then over 40 percent from deep, including 42.5 percent off the catch, per Synergy. Conwell is terrific in the pick-and-roll game. He can shoot the 3 if his man goes under, makes the simple pass when he draws two to the ball and is really good attacking switches and getting downhill. In pick-and-roll scenarios that include passes, Indiana State scored 1.248 points per possession when Conwell was the handler, per Synergy. Out of Indiana State’s three guards, his combination of skill and size suggest that he has the best shot at translating to the high-major level. It also wouldn’t be a bad idea for him to consider following Josh Schertz to Saint Louis, because Schertz’s system is ideal for his game.— C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-4Wt: 195

Conwell came out of nowhere to become one of the best mid-major guards in the country. He went from averaging 5.1 points per game, making 27 3s and shooting 30 percent from distance as a freshman at South Florida to averaging 16.6 points, making 104 3s at a 40.7 percent clip and averaging 5.8 rebounds and 2.5 assists at Indiana State as a sophom*ore. The lefty is the ideal guard in the modern game. Every one of his shots this season was a 3 or a layup, and his efficiency numbers were picturesque: 61.3 percent on 2s, 85.5 percent at the free-throw line (on 3.4 attempts per game) and then over 40 percent from deep, including 42.5 percent off the catch, per Synergy. Conwell is terrific in the pick-and-roll game. He can shoot the 3 if his man goes under, makes the simple pass when he draws two to the ball and is really good attacking switches and getting downhill. In pick-and-roll scenarios that include passes, Indiana State scored 1.248 points per possession when Conwell was the handler, per Synergy. Out of Indiana State’s three guards, his combination of skill and size suggest that he has the best shot at translating to the high-major level. It also wouldn’t be a bad idea for him to consider following Josh Schertz to Saint Louis, because Schertz’s system is ideal for his game.— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

For a minute this season, it looked like Carlyle might end up as a one-and-done. After missing the first month of the campaign, Carlyle averaged 15.4 points, 3.4 rebounds and 2.8 assists in his first 11 games of the season, including a monster 28-point performance against Arizona where he drilled six 3s and lived at the foul line. Then, the second half of the season happened. In his final 12 games, he averaged just 7.9 points, had more turnovers than assists and shot just 31.7 percent from the field. His shooting from distance fell off a bit and his handle was a bit looser than I’d seen at lower levels, which prevented him from getting into the paint as consistently as someone with his tools should.

While I don’t think Carlyle is wired to be a true point guard, his demeanor is fantastic. He’s relentless and aggressive in constantly attacking the rim, and while Stanford’s defense was messy, I always thought he was tough and willing to crawl into his opponent’s space. If he gets his pull-up jumper back to where it was to start this season, he can be the kind of three-level collegiate scorer who makes a high-major all-conference team at some point.

Carlyle is from the Atlanta area and could look to move back south following his trip to the West Coast. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

For a minute this season, it looked like Carlyle might end up as a one-and-done. After missing the first month of the campaign, Carlyle averaged 15.4 points, 3.4 rebounds and 2.8 assists in his first 11 games of the season, including a monster 28-point performance against Arizona where he drilled six 3s and lived at the foul line. Then, the second half of the season happened. In his final 12 games, he averaged just 7.9 points, had more turnovers than assists and shot just 31.7 percent from the field. His shooting from distance fell off a bit and his handle was a bit looser than I’d seen at lower levels, which prevented him from getting into the paint as consistently as someone with his tools should.

While I don’t think Carlyle is wired to be a true point guard, his demeanor is fantastic. He’s relentless and aggressive in constantly attacking the rim, and while Stanford’s defense was messy, I always thought he was tough and willing to crawl into his opponent’s space. If he gets his pull-up jumper back to where it was to start this season, he can be the kind of three-level collegiate scorer who makes a high-major all-conference team at some point.

Carlyle is from the Atlanta area and could look to move back south following his trip to the West Coast. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Congue quisque egestas diam in. In nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam. Penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes nascetur ridiculus. Vulputate enim nulla aliquet porttitor lacus luctus acc*msan tortor posuere. Morbi non arcu risus quis varius quam quisque id diam. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar.

— author

Stats

Ht: 6-11Wt: 240

Aidoo was a big part of Tennessee finishing third in adjusted defensive efficiency. He offers rim protection (1.8 blocks per game/eighth-best 2-point defense) and he can operate in just about any kind of pick-and-roll coverage (drop, up-to-touch, hard hedge). Aidoo’s defensive versatility is what makes him most desirable. The only real issue he has defensively is guarding low-post behemoths like a Zach Edey. He can be bullied in the post, but there are few Edey types in college basketball. Offensively, Aidoo is able to step out and hit a mid-range jumper off the roll. He can make jump hooks with either hand and put pressure on the rim with his rolls. He averaged 11.4 points and 7.3 rebounds. He’s rarely going to put up big numbers — he scored 20-plus three times this year — but he’s reliable. It’s his ability to get out on the floor and cover ground defensively where he brings the most value. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-11Wt: 240

Aidoo was a big part of Tennessee finishing third in adjusted defensive efficiency. He offers rim protection (1.8 blocks per game/eighth-best 2-point defense) and he can operate in just about any kind of pick-and-roll coverage (drop, up-to-touch, hard hedge). Aidoo’s defensive versatility is what makes him most desirable. The only real issue he has defensively is guarding low-post behemoths like a Zach Edey. He can be bullied in the post, but there are few Edey types in college basketball. Offensively, Aidoo is able to step out and hit a mid-range jumper off the roll. He can make jump hooks with either hand and put pressure on the rim with his rolls. He averaged 11.4 points and 7.3 rebounds. He’s rarely going to put up big numbers — he scored 20-plus three times this year — but he’s reliable. It’s his ability to get out on the floor and cover ground defensively where he brings the most value. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

The younger brother of Denver Nuggets rookie forward Hunter Tyson, Cade has shown more polish at this age. He won the Missouri Valley Rookie of the Year award in 2022-23 in his first season at Belmont, then improved as a sophom*ore to earn second-team All-MVC honors. All told, he averaged 16.2 points and 5.9 rebounds per game while shooting 49.3 percent from the field, 46.5 percent from 3 and 85.5 percent from the free-throw line last season.

Tyson may be the best shooter in the portal, having drilled 44.6 percent of his nearly 300 3-point attempts over his two college seasons. His preparation is superb, he fires with perfect alignment to the rim and generates a beautiful high arc with tremendous rotation on the ball. He should be even more dangerous playing next to better players at a high major next season; he’ll either space the floor for them, or kill opponents from distance when they devote too much attention to drivers.

But there’s more to Tyson’s game than that of other floor-spacing shooters. Tyson got to the rim by attacking closeouts or finding open areas to cut effectively in Belmont’s offense. He flashed potential as a ballhandler in the MVC, occasionally using ball screens and hand-offs to get downhill to the rim.

That makes Tyson a ready-made difference-making starter for a high major team, with real potential to elevate to an all-conference level as a senior. He’s not a sieve on defense, and at the very least, his floor-spacing impact on offense will be instantly enormous. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

The younger brother of Denver Nuggets rookie forward Hunter Tyson, Cade has shown more polish at this age. He won the Missouri Valley Rookie of the Year award in 2022-23 in his first season at Belmont, then improved as a sophom*ore to earn second-team All-MVC honors. All told, he averaged 16.2 points and 5.9 rebounds per game while shooting 49.3 percent from the field, 46.5 percent from 3 and 85.5 percent from the free-throw line last season.

Tyson may be the best shooter in the portal, having drilled 44.6 percent of his nearly 300 3-point attempts over his two college seasons. His preparation is superb, he fires with perfect alignment to the rim and generates a beautiful high arc with tremendous rotation on the ball. He should be even more dangerous playing next to better players at a high major next season; he’ll either space the floor for them, or kill opponents from distance when they devote too much attention to drivers.

But there’s more to Tyson’s game than that of other floor-spacing shooters. Tyson got to the rim by attacking closeouts or finding open areas to cut effectively in Belmont’s offense. He flashed potential as a ballhandler in the MVC, occasionally using ball screens and hand-offs to get downhill to the rim.

That makes Tyson a ready-made difference-making starter for a high major team, with real potential to elevate to an all-conference level as a senior. He’s not a sieve on defense, and at the very least, his floor-spacing impact on offense will be instantly enormous. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Congue quisque egestas diam in. In nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam. Penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes nascetur ridiculus. Vulputate enim nulla aliquet porttitor lacus luctus acc*msan tortor posuere. Morbi non arcu risus quis varius quam quisque id diam. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar.

— author

Stats

Ht: 6-6Wt: 190

Edwards exploded onto the national stage this season for one of the country’s best mid-major teams. He won the Sun Belt Player of the Year award after averaging 17.2 points while shooting 42.7 percent from the field, 34.3 percent from 3 and 81 percent from the line.

He was the primary creator for the 32-4 Dukes, playing largely as a big wing initiator next to shooters Noah Friedel and Xavier Brown in the backcourt. Typically, one of the guards brought the ball up the court before getting it to Edwards to begin their sets. Coach Mark Byington had Edwards play out of ball screens for the most part, and Edwards thrived in those settings as a sort of super-charged Swiss army knife who could see over his man and read the defense before making the right play. He throws terrific passes off a live dribble from multiple angles, averaging 3.4 assists per game, before fully taking over late in games. He can dynamically spin to either side and get to his shots, or he can drive all the way to the rim.

One thing worth tracking is that he wasn’t a particularly good finisher this year, making just 49 percent of his shots at the rim, per Synergy. But with TJ Bickerstaff and Jaylen Carey taking up space inside, Edwards did have to deal with at least one help man waiting to slide over at the rim.

Throw in Edwards’ solid (though not necessarily elite) defense, and he has all the makings of an top quality high-major wing. With Byington leaving James Madison to go to Vanderbilt, one has to wonder if Edwards will follow to get a chance to run the show in the SEC for a season. If he doesn’t, he’ll be a highly sought after player among even the highest-end schools. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-6Wt: 190

Edwards exploded onto the national stage this season for one of the country’s best mid-major teams. He won the Sun Belt Player of the Year award after averaging 17.2 points while shooting 42.7 percent from the field, 34.3 percent from 3 and 81 percent from the line.

He was the primary creator for the 32-4 Dukes, playing largely as a big wing initiator next to shooters Noah Friedel and Xavier Brown in the backcourt. Typically, one of the guards brought the ball up the court before getting it to Edwards to begin their sets. Coach Mark Byington had Edwards play out of ball screens for the most part, and Edwards thrived in those settings as a sort of super-charged Swiss army knife who could see over his man and read the defense before making the right play. He throws terrific passes off a live dribble from multiple angles, averaging 3.4 assists per game, before fully taking over late in games. He can dynamically spin to either side and get to his shots, or he can drive all the way to the rim.

One thing worth tracking is that he wasn’t a particularly good finisher this year, making just 49 percent of his shots at the rim, per Synergy. But with TJ Bickerstaff and Jaylen Carey taking up space inside, Edwards did have to deal with at least one help man waiting to slide over at the rim.

Throw in Edwards’ solid (though not necessarily elite) defense, and he has all the makings of an top quality high-major wing. With Byington leaving James Madison to go to Vanderbilt, one has to wonder if Edwards will follow to get a chance to run the show in the SEC for a season. If he doesn’t, he’ll be a highly sought after player among even the highest-end schools. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Edwards will head to Louisville to play for new coach Pat Kelsey. He is the third transfer commitment for Louisville this spring, joining Kelsey’s former Charleston players Reyne Smith and James Scott. Edwards and Smith should pair well together in the backcourt. Smith is undersized for an off-guard, but he’ll be one of the best shooters in college basketball next season. He’ll blend nicely on offense with Edwards, who, at 6-foot-6, acted as a big wing initiator for James this past season with the ability to play both on and off the ball.

Edwards is a player Kelsey knows, as he played against Edwards' teams for two seasons in the Colonial Athletic Association before James Madison moved its athletics to the Sun Belt Conference. Edwards actually had one of his best games as an underclassman against Kelsey and Charleston, scoring 18 points on Feb. 17, 2022.

With such a wide open roster, the Cardinals just need more talented players. Getting one of the best available upperclassmen in the portal should help in a substantial way. Now, Kelsey just needs to keep finding more. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 7-0 Wt: 255

Wolf immediately becomes one of the best players in the portal, a player who would have entered next season as one of the favorites for preseason player of the year in the Ivy League. He was a first-team All-Ivy League selection this season and won the Ivy League Tournament MVP while leading Yale to a 23-10 record that included an upset of Auburn in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. He averaged 14.1 points, nearly 10 rebounds, 2.4 assists and over a steal and a block per game.

Wolf’s a 7-footer, but he’s not a particularly stiff one. He moves exceedingly well for his size, with real speed. He sprints to areas to post up, often beating his defender to the spot to get strong post position. He can attack opposing bigs off the bounce in a serious way off of spot-up situations, getting to the rim quickly and finishing with flexibility. He has actual crossover moves and can pump fake to force a defender off their feet. He shot 47 percent from the field, which seems not great for a big, but it’s because well over half of his attempts at the rim are self-created looks on drives or post-ups.

But part of why the drives work is that Wolf can also step away and shoot the 3. He made 35 percent from distance this year, showing that you have to respect him out there. He has some real range out there, too. The key for Wolf is the growth trajectory he’s on. Last year, he was a real project at Yale, getting only seven minutes per game. After only a year, he was already one of the best players in that league. The idea here is what he could be after another offseason of work. He’s not a sure thing, as he did struggle this year against the best teams Yale played. But my bet is that he learns fast and we see an even better player a year from now. I’m buying into him being an impact guy wherever he ends up next season.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 7-0 Wt: 255

Wolf immediately becomes one of the best players in the portal, a player who would have entered next season as one of the favorites for preseason player of the year in the Ivy League. He was a first-team All-Ivy League selection this season and won the Ivy League Tournament MVP while leading Yale to a 23-10 record that included an upset of Auburn in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. He averaged 14.1 points, nearly 10 rebounds, 2.4 assists and over a steal and a block per game.

Wolf’s a 7-footer, but he’s not a particularly stiff one. He moves exceedingly well for his size, with real speed. He sprints to areas to post up, often beating his defender to the spot to get strong post position. He can attack opposing bigs off the bounce in a serious way off of spot-up situations, getting to the rim quickly and finishing with flexibility. He has actual crossover moves and can pump fake to force a defender off their feet. He shot 47 percent from the field, which seems not great for a big, but it’s because well over half of his attempts at the rim are self-created looks on drives or post-ups.

But part of why the drives work is that Wolf can also step away and shoot the 3. He made 35 percent from distance this year, showing that you have to respect him out there. He has some real range out there, too. The key for Wolf is the growth trajectory he’s on. Last year, he was a real project at Yale, getting only seven minutes per game. After only a year, he was already one of the best players in that league. The idea here is what he could be after another offseason of work. He’s not a sure thing, as he did struggle this year against the best teams Yale played. But my bet is that he learns fast and we see an even better player a year from now. I’m buying into him being an impact guy wherever he ends up next season.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6Wt: 210

Davis is a unique wing in how he scores the ball. He averaged 15.0 points this season and he’s a matchup problem because of his ability to operate out of Barkleys, backing his man down and then spinning to the basket. He has a good sense for where his defender is and gaining leverage in dribble-downs. He’s slithery and usually ends up in the paint. He can overpower perimeter players, and if you put a bigger guy on him, he can face up and drive to the basket. He’s clearly put in the work to make himself a shooter. He shot just 22.8 percent from 3 in two seasons at Louisville and has been a 36.8 percent 3-point shooter the last two years at Seton Hall. He does most of his scoring in the paint, but he’s capable of stepping out and knocking down a jumper. The threat of his shot has made him an even more dangerous slasher. Davis also rebounds well for his size (5.9 per game) and is a willing passer (1.6 assists per game) when he draws two to the ball. What you’re getting in Davis is a grown man who knows how to play the game on both ends. He can play either forward position. His combination of scoring ability, defense and experience makes him an easy plug-and-play just about anywhere. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-6Wt: 210

Davis is a unique wing in how he scores the ball. He averaged 15.0 points this season and he’s a matchup problem because of his ability to operate out of Barkleys, backing his man down and then spinning to the basket. He has a good sense for where his defender is and gaining leverage in dribble-downs. He’s slithery and usually ends up in the paint. He can overpower perimeter players, and if you put a bigger guy on him, he can face up and drive to the basket. He’s clearly put in the work to make himself a shooter. He shot just 22.8 percent from 3 in two seasons at Louisville and has been a 36.8 percent 3-point shooter the last two years at Seton Hall. He does most of his scoring in the paint, but he’s capable of stepping out and knocking down a jumper. The threat of his shot has made him an even more dangerous slasher. Davis also rebounds well for his size (5.9 per game) and is a willing passer (1.6 assists per game) when he draws two to the ball. What you’re getting in Davis is a grown man who knows how to play the game on both ends. He can play either forward position. His combination of scoring ability, defense and experience makes him an easy plug-and-play just about anywhere. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

Storr was the best player on a Wisconsin team that ended up with a No. 5 seed in the NCAA Tournament. He averaged 16.8 points and 3.9 rebounds on his way to second-team All-Big East, although his overall game does leave something to be desired beyond the scoring.

The good news is that it’s really hard to stop him from scoring. He’s a big-time athlete out in transition and as a driver or cutter to the rim. That makes him a mismatch nightmare within college basketball. Once he gets a bit of downhill steam, he’s going to get to the basket. Storr takes a ton of contested shots and doesn’t really see the floor all that well in finding teammates for dump-off passes or kickouts. Storr made just 53.6 percent of his halfcourt attempts at the rim, per Synergy, a rough number for someone this big and strong.

Whether or not he’s able to be the lead guy on a great team will come down to him continuing to develop as a decision maker and as a shooter. Storr is also declaring for the NBA Draft, but I’d be surprised to see him go pro given what the likely NIL offers for him will be. Any team in need of someone who can get a reasonable look at the basket should absolutely recruit Storr. But it would benefit him, as well, if that team also has multiple options so that he can slot nicely into a role as a finisher.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

Storr was the best player on a Wisconsin team that ended up with a No. 5 seed in the NCAA Tournament. He averaged 16.8 points and 3.9 rebounds on his way to second-team All-Big East, although his overall game does leave something to be desired beyond the scoring.

The good news is that it’s really hard to stop him from scoring. He’s a big-time athlete out in transition and as a driver or cutter to the rim. That makes him a mismatch nightmare within college basketball. Once he gets a bit of downhill steam, he’s going to get to the basket. Storr takes a ton of contested shots and doesn’t really see the floor all that well in finding teammates for dump-off passes or kickouts. Storr made just 53.6 percent of his halfcourt attempts at the rim, per Synergy, a rough number for someone this big and strong.

Whether or not he’s able to be the lead guy on a great team will come down to him continuing to develop as a decision maker and as a shooter. Storr is also declaring for the NBA Draft, but I’d be surprised to see him go pro given what the likely NIL offers for him will be. Any team in need of someone who can get a reasonable look at the basket should absolutely recruit Storr. But it would benefit him, as well, if that team also has multiple options so that he can slot nicely into a role as a finisher.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 240

As one of the most underappreciated defensive players in college basketball, Omoyuri’s name in the portal will spark a frenzy. He has been the catalyst behind Rutgers finishing fourth and sixth in the country, respectively, in KenPom’s adjusted defensive efficiency metric in each of the last two seasons. This season, he swatted 2.9 shots per game in just 27 minutes per night, and while he earned Big Ten All-Defense honors for the season straight season, he should have been among the national semifinalists for the Naismith Defensive Player of the Year award. It is exceptionally hard to finish over his 7-foot-6 wingspan. Whichever team sways him will get an immediate upgrade on that end of the court.

Omoruyi has been more hit-or-miss on offense, likely due to the way Rutgers used him. I’ve always liked him most as a rim-runner in ball screens who occasionally rolled into quick duck-ins. Omoruyi made 70 percent of his attempts as a roller this season, per Synergy. The Scarlet Knights, however, used him more as a straight post-up big, where he is merely okay. His new team would be wise to deploy him as a screener and diver, or move him to the dunker spot when he’s not involved in the primary action. That way, he can wedge his way into deep seals in the post and be in better position for offensive rebound opportunities, where his length has always been an advantage.

It’s a bit of a surprise to see Omoruyi depart, as Rutgers has a loaded recruiting class next year led by Ace Bailey and Dylan Harper. If the NBA is Omoruyi’s goal, the only program with more scouting eyes on it than Rutgers will be Duke. While Omoruyi would be a tremendous defensive anchor for a group of highly-talented freshmen to have, it looks like someone else will get him.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 240

As one of the most underappreciated defensive players in college basketball, Omoyuri’s name in the portal will spark a frenzy. He has been the catalyst behind Rutgers finishing fourth and sixth in the country, respectively, in KenPom’s adjusted defensive efficiency metric in each of the last two seasons. This season, he swatted 2.9 shots per game in just 27 minutes per night, and while he earned Big Ten All-Defense honors for the season straight season, he should have been among the national semifinalists for the Naismith Defensive Player of the Year award. It is exceptionally hard to finish over his 7-foot-6 wingspan. Whichever team sways him will get an immediate upgrade on that end of the court.

Omoruyi has been more hit-or-miss on offense, likely due to the way Rutgers used him. I’ve always liked him most as a rim-runner in ball screens who occasionally rolled into quick duck-ins. Omoruyi made 70 percent of his attempts as a roller this season, per Synergy. The Scarlet Knights, however, used him more as a straight post-up big, where he is merely okay. His new team would be wise to deploy him as a screener and diver, or move him to the dunker spot when he’s not involved in the primary action. That way, he can wedge his way into deep seals in the post and be in better position for offensive rebound opportunities, where his length has always been an advantage.

It’s a bit of a surprise to see Omoruyi depart, as Rutgers has a loaded recruiting class next year led by Ace Bailey and Dylan Harper. If the NBA is Omoruyi’s goal, the only program with more scouting eyes on it than Rutgers will be Duke. While Omoruyi would be a tremendous defensive anchor for a group of highly-talented freshmen to have, it looks like someone else will get him.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Congue quisque egestas diam in. In nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam. Penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes nascetur ridiculus. Vulputate enim nulla aliquet porttitor lacus luctus acc*msan tortor posuere. Morbi non arcu risus quis varius quam quisque id diam. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar.

— author

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 180

Gillespie will be in high demand after making second-team All-Missouri Valley and the MVC All-Defense team last season. He averaged 17.2 points per game year while shooting 56.1 percent from the field, a ridiculous number for a small guard.

Gillespie’s game exists at the intersection of speed and touch. He’s a fast guard who loves to play up tempo to get to the rim. Though Belmont’s offense didn’t feature as many ball screens as other schools’, Gillespie is adept at getting downhill on those actions or when taking a dribble hand-off on the move. He uses the threat of his shot to attack closeouts and is an excellent finisher for a small guard, showing an aptitude for adjusting in mid-air with a variety of touch finger rolls and finishes. He made 71.2 percent of shots at the rim this season, per Synergy, one of the highest marks in the country for a guard. And his touch extends beyond the hoop; Gillespie has a nice floater game and can drill pull-up 3s.

Throw in his high-pressure defense, and Gillespie is a big get for any team in the country. The recent hit rate of players moving from the Missouri Valley to high-major conferences has been extremely high. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 180

Gillespie will be in high demand after making second-team All-Missouri Valley and the MVC All-Defense team last season. He averaged 17.2 points per game year while shooting 56.1 percent from the field, a ridiculous number for a small guard.

Gillespie’s game exists at the intersection of speed and touch. He’s a fast guard who loves to play up tempo to get to the rim. Though Belmont’s offense didn’t feature as many ball screens as other schools’, Gillespie is adept at getting downhill on those actions or when taking a dribble hand-off on the move. He uses the threat of his shot to attack closeouts and is an excellent finisher for a small guard, showing an aptitude for adjusting in mid-air with a variety of touch finger rolls and finishes. He made 71.2 percent of shots at the rim this season, per Synergy, one of the highest marks in the country for a guard. And his touch extends beyond the hoop; Gillespie has a nice floater game and can drill pull-up 3s.

Throw in his high-pressure defense, and Gillespie is a big get for any team in the country. The recent hit rate of players moving from the Missouri Valley to high-major conferences has been extremely high. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

One of the best guards in the portal is off to Maryland, as Terps coach Kevin Willard makes a second big-time backcourt investment after first securing Virginia Tech scorer Rodney Rice. Gillespie is more ready to play immediately and will step into the role vacated by the graduating Jahmir Young. Maryland desperately needed more depth in its backcourt even after securing Rice, as role player Jahari Long was the only holdover likely to receive guard minutes next season. (Sophom*ore Chance Stephens may be back as well, but he’s still recovering from a serious knee injury suffered last summer.) Honestly, the Terps have room to add even more to their backcourt.

Locking in Gillespie, likely with a sizable NIL deal, is a great start to an incredibly important 2024-25 season for Willard in College Park. I bet Gillespie makes an All-Big 10 team at some point in the next two seasons. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 185

The Summit League Player of the Year is a big addition to the portal after a second consecutive monster season for South Dakota State. Mayo is a big-time scorer, averaging 18.8 points, 5.8 rebounds and 3.5 assists this season while shooting 46.6 percent from the field, 39.1 percent from 3 and 82.8 percent from the line. He orchestrated the show for a team that made the NCAA Tournament and won the Summit League this year.

Mayo is a real pull-up threat across the court. His 35-percent mark on 144 3-point attempts doesn’t seem wild, but he got there on insanely difficult attempts that, by and large, he had to create himself. Only 10 players in college basketball took more pull-up 3-point attempts per game than Mayo, and he finished eighth among the 25 highest-volume pull-up 3-point shooters in percentage. Because he’s constantly probing and a threat to get his shot off from any spot, defenders have to stay attached to him, which makes him an effective driver. He was an awesome finisher in the Summit League, making 61.4 percent of his halfcourt shot attempts at the rim, and has a nice floater as well.

His middling results against top competition are worth noting. He made 5-of-13 shots for 11 points against Kansas State, had eight turnovers in a game against UCF and struggled in a game against Alabama as a sophom*ore. But he did play well in the team’s NCAA Tournament game against arguably the country’s best defense in Iowa State, going for 19 points on 11 shots.

Mayo is a legitimate difference-maker and automatic starter at the high-major level, with some all-conference upside next year in the right spot.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4Wt: 185

The Summit League Player of the Year is a big addition to the portal after a second consecutive monster season for South Dakota State. Mayo is a big-time scorer, averaging 18.8 points, 5.8 rebounds and 3.5 assists this season while shooting 46.6 percent from the field, 39.1 percent from 3 and 82.8 percent from the line. He orchestrated the show for a team that made the NCAA Tournament and won the Summit League this year.

Mayo is a real pull-up threat across the court. His 35-percent mark on 144 3-point attempts doesn’t seem wild, but he got there on insanely difficult attempts that, by and large, he had to create himself. Only 10 players in college basketball took more pull-up 3-point attempts per game than Mayo, and he finished eighth among the 25 highest-volume pull-up 3-point shooters in percentage. Because he’s constantly probing and a threat to get his shot off from any spot, defenders have to stay attached to him, which makes him an effective driver. He was an awesome finisher in the Summit League, making 61.4 percent of his halfcourt shot attempts at the rim, and has a nice floater as well.

His middling results against top competition are worth noting. He made 5-of-13 shots for 11 points against Kansas State, had eight turnovers in a game against UCF and struggled in a game against Alabama as a sophom*ore. But he did play well in the team’s NCAA Tournament game against arguably the country’s best defense in Iowa State, going for 19 points on 11 shots.

Mayo is a legitimate difference-maker and automatic starter at the high-major level, with some all-conference upside next year in the right spot.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Kansas’ most glaring issue last season was the absence of a backcourt bucket-getter. The Jayhawks finished 59th in the country in KenPom’s adjusted offensive rating, the worst mark in Bill Self’s 21-year tenure. (They’ve ranked in the top 10 more often than they haven’t in the last 17 years.) Dajuan Harris and Kevin McCullar lacked pull-up shooting gravity, and Elmarko Jackson wasn’t ready yet.

Pull-up shooting is exactly what Mayo brings to the table. He fills both a positional and significant skill-based need that should give Self more flexibility when constructing the team’s offensive system next season. If Hunter Dickinson returns, he and Mayo could execute all sorts of dribble hand-off actions that will be challenging to defend.

Kansas has a few things left to fix from last season’s disappointment, but Mayo is about as good a start in the portal as they could have hoped. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 240

Goldin arrived at FAU after spending his first season at Texas Tech, where he seldom played. He developed into a star for the Owls and was motivated last offseason after a disappointing finish in the Final Four, when he scored only five points in the team’s loss to San Diego State. He wanted to get back to the tournament and redeem himself, and while the Owls lost in the first round to Northwestern, Goldin was terrific, scoring 19 points on 5-of-6 shooting and 9-of-11 at the free throw line to go along with nine rebounds and four blocks.

Goldin is one of the best back-to-the-basket players in college basketball. Last season, he scored 1.203 points per possession on post-ups, per Synergy. He takes pride in being able to shoot equally well with either hand and can score over either shoulder. If he gets close to the basket, he will dunk it with authority. His aggressiveness went up this season as his confidence grew, allowing him to bump his scoring average up from 10.2 points as a junior to 15.7 points as a senior.

Goldin’s biggest weakness is that he struggles playing in space. He runs the floor hard, moves well for his size and is a solid rim protector in drop coverage in the pick-and-roll. He’s not the quickest laterally and he’s a little stiff in the hips, but he’s an adequate defender if allowed to stay close to the basket.

He’d fit well in a system that involves throwing the ball into the post often rather than one that involves five players on the perimeter. He’s so gifted as a low-post scorer that then-Owls coach Dusty May adjusted his approach to take advantage of Goldin’s abilities on the blocks. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 240

Goldin arrived at FAU after spending his first season at Texas Tech, where he seldom played. He developed into a star for the Owls and was motivated last offseason after a disappointing finish in the Final Four, when he scored only five points in the team’s loss to San Diego State. He wanted to get back to the tournament and redeem himself, and while the Owls lost in the first round to Northwestern, Goldin was terrific, scoring 19 points on 5-of-6 shooting and 9-of-11 at the free throw line to go along with nine rebounds and four blocks.

Goldin is one of the best back-to-the-basket players in college basketball. Last season, he scored 1.203 points per possession on post-ups, per Synergy. He takes pride in being able to shoot equally well with either hand and can score over either shoulder. If he gets close to the basket, he will dunk it with authority. His aggressiveness went up this season as his confidence grew, allowing him to bump his scoring average up from 10.2 points as a junior to 15.7 points as a senior.

Goldin’s biggest weakness is that he struggles playing in space. He runs the floor hard, moves well for his size and is a solid rim protector in drop coverage in the pick-and-roll. He’s not the quickest laterally and he’s a little stiff in the hips, but he’s an adequate defender if allowed to stay close to the basket.

He’d fit well in a system that involves throwing the ball into the post often rather than one that involves five players on the perimeter. He’s so gifted as a low-post scorer that then-Owls coach Dusty May adjusted his approach to take advantage of Goldin’s abilities on the blocks. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 160

McCollum was one of the best scoring guards in the Big 12. He averaged 13.3 points and 3.3 assists at OU, proving he can be productive at the high-major level. He’s small, but he can fly and shake defenders with his speed and handle, whether in isolation or when playing out of the pick-and-roll, as he often did at OU.

He’s one of the rare players who shoots it better off the dribble than the catch. Last season, he made only 25.6 percent of his catch-and-shoot jumpers, per Synergy, while shooting 39.3 percent off the bounce. That’s one reason his overall 3-point percentage dropped to 31.4 percent at Oklahoma after he made 37.5 percent of his 3s over his first two seasons at Sienna College. He did shoot 38.6 percent in catch-and-shoot situations in that span, so it’s possible he can be better in that area for his new team. He’s also an elite free throw shooter, making 94.3 percent this past season.

McCollum can play either guard spot for his new team, though he was in an ideal situation at OU playing next to a bigger point guard in the 6-4 Milos Uzan. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 160

McCollum was one of the best scoring guards in the Big 12. He averaged 13.3 points and 3.3 assists at OU, proving he can be productive at the high-major level. He’s small, but he can fly and shake defenders with his speed and handle, whether in isolation or when playing out of the pick-and-roll, as he often did at OU.

He’s one of the rare players who shoots it better off the dribble than the catch. Last season, he made only 25.6 percent of his catch-and-shoot jumpers, per Synergy, while shooting 39.3 percent off the bounce. That’s one reason his overall 3-point percentage dropped to 31.4 percent at Oklahoma after he made 37.5 percent of his 3s over his first two seasons at Sienna College. He did shoot 38.6 percent in catch-and-shoot situations in that span, so it’s possible he can be better in that area for his new team. He’s also an elite free throw shooter, making 94.3 percent this past season.

McCollum can play either guard spot for his new team, though he was in an ideal situation at OU playing next to a bigger point guard in the 6-4 Milos Uzan. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 245

A top-40 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Garrison showed a ton of flashes in his only season with the Cowboys. The most promising ones were on defense, where Garrison is an athletic shot blocker whose length really plays up. He can block shots with both hands and improved his positioning in drop pick-and-roll coverage throughout the season. While he played a role in Oklahoma State having one of the Big 12’s worst defenses, he, like the team’s other bigs, was often hung out to dry by guards failing to stay in front of anyone. With more experience and in a more structured scheme, I expect Garrison to become a serious impact defender.

On offense, Garrison’s range doesn’t extend far beyond finishing around the rim. However, I liked him most in ball-screens, where he showcased his mobility and created a great target for his guards with well-timed rolls. Garrison also flashed serious passing chops in hand-offs and give-and-gos with his guards, as well as in short rolls and the pivot. He needs to improve as a post-up player; he seemed to have trouble getting a foothold on the block at times. But Garrison made about 77 percent of his shots at the rim this year, and it was all those low-efficiency hook shots and midrange post jumpers that dragged his overall field goal percentage down to 57 percent.

Still, he averaged 7.5 points, 5.3 rebounds and 1.5 blocks per game in a loaded Big 12 that featured a ton of great bigs. I’d bet on him being an excellent multi-year starter for even the highest-level programs in the country, with all-conference upside as an upperclassman. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 245

A top-40 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Garrison showed a ton of flashes in his only season with the Cowboys. The most promising ones were on defense, where Garrison is an athletic shot blocker whose length really plays up. He can block shots with both hands and improved his positioning in drop pick-and-roll coverage throughout the season. While he played a role in Oklahoma State having one of the Big 12’s worst defenses, he, like the team’s other bigs, was often hung out to dry by guards failing to stay in front of anyone. With more experience and in a more structured scheme, I expect Garrison to become a serious impact defender.

On offense, Garrison’s range doesn’t extend far beyond finishing around the rim. However, I liked him most in ball-screens, where he showcased his mobility and created a great target for his guards with well-timed rolls. Garrison also flashed serious passing chops in hand-offs and give-and-gos with his guards, as well as in short rolls and the pivot. He needs to improve as a post-up player; he seemed to have trouble getting a foothold on the block at times. But Garrison made about 77 percent of his shots at the rim this year, and it was all those low-efficiency hook shots and midrange post jumpers that dragged his overall field goal percentage down to 57 percent.

Still, he averaged 7.5 points, 5.3 rebounds and 1.5 blocks per game in a loaded Big 12 that featured a ton of great bigs. I’d bet on him being an excellent multi-year starter for even the highest-level programs in the country, with all-conference upside as an upperclassman. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 200

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 200

How he fits

Johnson will be moving right down the road for his new home in a rare USC-to-UCLA transfer.

This is a perfect blend of filling a need with an ideal fit. It wouldn’t stun me to see Johnson morph into the Pac-12 Defensive Player of the Year under Mick Cronin, a coach who embraces that side of the floor. Considering the size limitations of the other Bruins' guards on the roster (Sebastian Mack, Skyy Clark, Dylan Andrews), Johnson should be a defensive difference-maker with his length and physical presence on opposing initiators at the point of attack.

It remains to be seen if Johnson’s offensive game blossoms under Cronin, which is what NBA scouts are curious to watch. The Bruins have a lot of guards, so I’m skeptical Johnson will get many on-ball chances. However, Cronin has in the past allowed bigger wings and guards to pass and make plays. At a minimum, UCLA will be better off for what Johnson brings on defense. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 215

Jimerson has seemingly been around forever, but he was a medical redshirt for the 2019-20 season and was then granted an extra year of eligibility due to the COVID-19 pandemic, so his eligibility didn’t begin ticking until his “junior” season in 2021-22. Because of that — and the Billikens firing head coach Travis Ford — Jimerson, one of the country’s best shooters, is available for the taking. He’s averaged 15.4 points per game over the last three seasons at Saint Louis and has earned All-Atlantic-10 honors each season.

Jimerson has made 39.5 percent of his nearly 800 3-point attempts as a collegiate, and to say his shot diet was difficult is an understatement. His form is about as simple as it gets, with a pristine release out of a set shot that, frankly, you’re surprised ever misses. He’s a threat in transition as a trailer and when spotting up and out of relocations, with range extending far beyond the NBA 3-point line. But he did most of his damage running through a bevy of pindown, flare and baseline off-ball screens designed to get him open to fire. His shot motion is versatile enough to function using different forms of footwork. Over the years, he’s grown more adept at using the threat of his shot to attack the rim.

Any program whose offensive scheme features lots of off-ball movement to generate 3s should call Jimerson. Connecticut, in particular, should be calling him off the hook. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 215

Jimerson has seemingly been around forever, but he was a medical redshirt for the 2019-20 season and was then granted an extra year of eligibility due to the COVID-19 pandemic, so his eligibility didn’t begin ticking until his “junior” season in 2021-22. Because of that — and the Billikens firing head coach Travis Ford — Jimerson, one of the country’s best shooters, is available for the taking. He’s averaged 15.4 points per game over the last three seasons at Saint Louis and has earned All-Atlantic-10 honors each season.

Jimerson has made 39.5 percent of his nearly 800 3-point attempts as a collegiate, and to say his shot diet was difficult is an understatement. His form is about as simple as it gets, with a pristine release out of a set shot that, frankly, you’re surprised ever misses. He’s a threat in transition as a trailer and when spotting up and out of relocations, with range extending far beyond the NBA 3-point line. But he did most of his damage running through a bevy of pindown, flare and baseline off-ball screens designed to get him open to fire. His shot motion is versatile enough to function using different forms of footwork. Over the years, he’s grown more adept at using the threat of his shot to attack the rim.

Any program whose offensive scheme features lots of off-ball movement to generate 3s should call Jimerson. Connecticut, in particular, should be calling him off the hook. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 250

Raynaud is a big-time addition to the portal. The second-team All-Pac-12 honoree and league’s Most Improved Player averaged 15.5 points, 9.6 rebounds and two assists per game while shooting 56.7 percent from the field. His frame filled out over the summer, allowing him to play with more force to move players around while still maintaining his mobility for his size.

More importantly, he’s one of the rarest types of players to enter the portal. In general, finding high-major bigs to transfer is harder than finding wings and guards. Finding real 7-footers is even harder. Finding ones with terrific perimeter games who can pick-and-pop, hit the occasional trail 3 on the break and are adept at running all sorts of dribble-hand-off actions is even harder than that.

Still, Raynaud thrives most around the basket. He can catch and score on the move in pick-and-rolls, secure dump-offs passes to finish with ease and operate as a sharp post player using sweet hooks shots with either hand. His game fits in almost every offensive scheme.

His defense is a question. His team will need to primarily deploy a drop scheme to keep him in the paint, as he’s not mobile enough to guard in space. He’s not quite the rim protector or shot contester that he should be given his size. But he has the tools to become more solid on that end in the right situation.

Regardless, Raynaud crushes the glass and has significant offensive versatility. He’ll be among the most popular players in the portal.

— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 250

Raynaud is a big-time addition to the portal. The second-team All-Pac-12 honoree and league’s Most Improved Player averaged 15.5 points, 9.6 rebounds and two assists per game while shooting 56.7 percent from the field. His frame filled out over the summer, allowing him to play with more force to move players around while still maintaining his mobility for his size.

More importantly, he’s one of the rarest types of players to enter the portal. In general, finding high-major bigs to transfer is harder than finding wings and guards. Finding real 7-footers is even harder. Finding ones with terrific perimeter games who can pick-and-pop, hit the occasional trail 3 on the break and are adept at running all sorts of dribble-hand-off actions is even harder than that.

Still, Raynaud thrives most around the basket. He can catch and score on the move in pick-and-rolls, secure dump-offs passes to finish with ease and operate as a sharp post player using sweet hooks shots with either hand. His game fits in almost every offensive scheme.

His defense is a question. His team will need to primarily deploy a drop scheme to keep him in the paint, as he’s not mobile enough to guard in space. He’s not quite the rim protector or shot contester that he should be given his size. But he has the tools to become more solid on that end in the right situation.

Regardless, Raynaud crushes the glass and has significant offensive versatility. He’ll be among the most popular players in the portal.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 175

McDaniel looked like one of the most dynamic guards in the Big Ten to start the season, averaging 19 points and five assists while shooting 45 percent from the field and 39 percent from 3 in Michigan’s first 13 games. His blow-by speed is real, his handle is tight and he can go from slow to fast in an instant. He was a reliable shooter off the catch last season (41 percent on catch-and-shoot 3s, per Synergy), so he can play as the lead ball-handler or next to another on-ball player.

However, McDaniel tailed off late, averaging just 13.5 points and 4.3 assists in his final 13 game while shooting 37.1 percent from the field. Unsurprisingly, his slump came as the team faced better talent in the Big Ten. It also featured a bizarre six-game, road-only suspension in order to focus on classwork, which hindered his rhythm.

But McDaniel showed enough in big games to buy into his upside. He had 33 points against Oregon and 26 points against St. John’s. His 33-point, eight-rebound, five-assist performance against Florida was ridiculous. When he got hot, there weren’t many players in the country more fun to watch.

He’s a clear starting guard at the High Major level with all-conference upside if he finds a scheme that lets him get up and down. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 175

McDaniel looked like one of the most dynamic guards in the Big Ten to start the season, averaging 19 points and five assists while shooting 45 percent from the field and 39 percent from 3 in Michigan’s first 13 games. His blow-by speed is real, his handle is tight and he can go from slow to fast in an instant. He was a reliable shooter off the catch last season (41 percent on catch-and-shoot 3s, per Synergy), so he can play as the lead ball-handler or next to another on-ball player.

However, McDaniel tailed off late, averaging just 13.5 points and 4.3 assists in his final 13 game while shooting 37.1 percent from the field. Unsurprisingly, his slump came as the team faced better talent in the Big Ten. It also featured a bizarre six-game, road-only suspension in order to focus on classwork, which hindered his rhythm.

But McDaniel showed enough in big games to buy into his upside. He had 33 points against Oregon and 26 points against St. John’s. His 33-point, eight-rebound, five-assist performance against Florida was ridiculous. When he got hot, there weren’t many players in the country more fun to watch.

He’s a clear starting guard at the High Major level with all-conference upside if he finds a scheme that lets him get up and down. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Jerome Tang brings in another small point guard in the transfer portal. After watching Markquis Nowell lead the Wildcats to the Elite Eight in 2023, Tang went back to the well last season and brought in Tylor Perry from North Texas. Perry proved not to be as effective a pull-up shooter as he was at North Texas, though.

Now, enter McDaniel, whose speed is more similar to Nowell's. McDaniel can really get up and down the court, which makes him a better fit in Tang's scheme than Perry. McDaniel is a threat to dribble, pass and shoot and can create his own offense. He's also proven himself at this level as a two-year starter at Michigan.

With Perry graduating and Cam Carter transferring, the Wildcats' backcourt figures to be quite different next season. Dai Dai Ames hasn’t yet hit the portal, and former Samford guard Ques Glover should be eligible for a medical redshirt after not seeing the court this season. The Wildcats' backcourt is quite small, though, and rising sophom*ore RJ Jones doesn't make them much taller at only 6-foot-3. It would behoove the Wildcats to get a bit more size and length on the wing in the coming days. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 5-10Wt: 170

Swope has the most in his bag out of the Indiana State guards. He can shoot with range and get to his jumper whenever he wants. He’s a hard shot-maker whose efficiency numbers take a little bit of a hit because he’s also a hard shot-taker. He shot just the exact same percentage (36.6) off the bounce and the catch, per Synergy. His production is really impressive — 15.9 points per game and 2.1 assists — when you consider he played most of the year battling knee injuries and putting off surgery. Before his first injury sidelined him for a game, he averaged 19.7 points and shot 44.7 percent from 3 over the first nine games of the season. He shot 42.3 percent from distance in his one season at Southern Indiana before transferring to Indiana State, so it’s possible the knee injuries took a toll on his efficiency. Swope is wired to score, and while he technically played point guard, center Robbie Avila played the role of facilitator more than Swope. Swope played really well off of Avila. They formed a terrific two-man game, playing out of pick-and-roll and gets. Swope has a good understanding of how to set himself up once he gives the ball up. He finishes well around the basket, especially for his size. He has a nice floater and can finish with either hand. He’s bouncy too and not afraid to try to go up and dunk it with a big man challenging. Swope has no shortage of confidence, nor should he considering all the different ways he can score. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 5-10Wt: 170

Swope has the most in his bag out of the Indiana State guards. He can shoot with range and get to his jumper whenever he wants. He’s a hard shot-maker whose efficiency numbers take a little bit of a hit because he’s also a hard shot-taker. He shot just the exact same percentage (36.6) off the bounce and the catch, per Synergy. His production is really impressive — 15.9 points per game and 2.1 assists — when you consider he played most of the year battling knee injuries and putting off surgery. Before his first injury sidelined him for a game, he averaged 19.7 points and shot 44.7 percent from 3 over the first nine games of the season. He shot 42.3 percent from distance in his one season at Southern Indiana before transferring to Indiana State, so it’s possible the knee injuries took a toll on his efficiency. Swope is wired to score, and while he technically played point guard, center Robbie Avila played the role of facilitator more than Swope. Swope played really well off of Avila. They formed a terrific two-man game, playing out of pick-and-roll and gets. Swope has a good understanding of how to set himself up once he gives the ball up. He finishes well around the basket, especially for his size. He has a nice floater and can finish with either hand. He’s bouncy too and not afraid to try to go up and dunk it with a big man challenging. Swope has no shortage of confidence, nor should he considering all the different ways he can score. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 7-0Wt: 260

Ballo is one of the best in college basketball at carving out space in the post and giving his guards a big target. He’s perfect in any offense that plays to the post pin. Arizona built its defense around Ballo’s ability to protect the rim and take up a lot of space in drop coverage. He doesn’t block a lot of shots (1.3 per game) but he’s hard to score over and is an elite rebounder. He can get picked on in drop coverage against talented guards. The recipe to beat Arizona was with guards who knew how to handle the drop and/or bigs who could pop. Foot speed is always going to be an issue. Ballo was a double-double machine, averaging 12.9 points and 10.1 rebounds per game. He shot 65.8 percent from the field but his efficiency takes a knock because of his poor free-throw shooting — a career-low 49.5 percent as a senior. His usage rate went down as Arizona leaned more on its guards this season, but Ballo is talented enough to have an offense run through him. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 7-0Wt: 260

Ballo is one of the best in college basketball at carving out space in the post and giving his guards a big target. He’s perfect in any offense that plays to the post pin. Arizona built its defense around Ballo’s ability to protect the rim and take up a lot of space in drop coverage. He doesn’t block a lot of shots (1.3 per game) but he’s hard to score over and is an elite rebounder. He can get picked on in drop coverage against talented guards. The recipe to beat Arizona was with guards who knew how to handle the drop and/or bigs who could pop. Foot speed is always going to be an issue. Ballo was a double-double machine, averaging 12.9 points and 10.1 rebounds per game. He shot 65.8 percent from the field but his efficiency takes a knock because of his poor free-throw shooting — a career-low 49.5 percent as a senior. His usage rate went down as Arizona leaned more on its guards this season, but Ballo is talented enough to have an offense run through him. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 220

The co-AAC Player of the Year is one of the best on-the-move shooters in the portal. Youngblood averaged 15.3 points per game as a senior at South Florida and was one of the rare players to transfer up a level — from the A-Sun to the AAC — and see his scoring average increase. When he has space, he’s close to automatic from deep. He made 69 3-pointers at a 41.6 percent clip. He’s good off the catch and the bounce.

Youngblood isn’t that quick with the ball but he’s strong and bodies bounce off him. He creates separation with his strength and ability to read screens playing off the ball. He shot 42.6 percent coming off screens, per Synergy. His experience is obvious in the way he plays on both ends. Defensively, he knows where to be and does a good job contesting shots despite having short arms. He didn’t put up big assist numbers (2.1 per game) but his passes arrive on target and with some pop. He usually makes the right read and is willing to make the extra pass when his gravity pulls extra defenders. Youngblood is the type of player who gets everything out of his ability. He helped Amir Abdur-Rahim flip Kennesaw State and then South Florida, where the coach and player won the American in their first year when USF was coming off a losing season. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-4Wt: 220

The co-AAC Player of the Year is one of the best on-the-move shooters in the portal. Youngblood averaged 15.3 points per game as a senior at South Florida and was one of the rare players to transfer up a level — from the A-Sun to the AAC — and see his scoring average increase. When he has space, he’s close to automatic from deep. He made 69 3-pointers at a 41.6 percent clip. He’s good off the catch and the bounce.

Youngblood isn’t that quick with the ball but he’s strong and bodies bounce off him. He creates separation with his strength and ability to read screens playing off the ball. He shot 42.6 percent coming off screens, per Synergy. His experience is obvious in the way he plays on both ends. Defensively, he knows where to be and does a good job contesting shots despite having short arms. He didn’t put up big assist numbers (2.1 per game) but his passes arrive on target and with some pop. He usually makes the right read and is willing to make the extra pass when his gravity pulls extra defenders. Youngblood is the type of player who gets everything out of his ability. He helped Amir Abdur-Rahim flip Kennesaw State and then South Florida, where the coach and player won the American in their first year when USF was coming off a losing season. — C.J. Moore

How he fits

Nate Oats loves shooting and lands one of the best shooters in the portal. Youngblood isn’t dynamic with the ball in his hands like Mark Sears or Aaron Estrada, but he’ll fit well as a floor spacer who can occasionally create his own shot. It would benefit Youngblood to play with a guard like Sears who can pull two to the ball and start the domino effect that leads to open shots. (Sears still has a year of eligibility left.) Youngblood does some of his scoring from the mid-range and that usually doesn’t fly at Alabama. But shooting with range is no issue, and that’s obviously why he was an attractive option for Alabama. He’s a Tuscaloosa native, so this is a return home.

— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

A former top-40 recruit from high school powerhouse Link Academy in Missouri, Reed had a solid freshman season as a defensive difference-maker off the bench before stepping into the starting role during the Wolverines’ disastrous 2023-24 season.

A strong, 260-pound big with quick feet and a high feel for the game, the idea was for Reed to play effectively in the post and defend. His performance this season was mixed, but it’s hard to say how much was his fault. He made more than 51 percent of his shot attempts on the block, per Synergy, and he crashed the offensive glass well to create second chances. But Reed isn’t a good leaper, so he didn’t get a ton of dunks and was contested or blocked more often on dump-offs or put-back attempts than a typical big. Additionally, because Michigan’s spacing was so bad, he was often crowded by defenders, resulting in a number of turnovers. His hands at times betrayed him, and he’d fumble easy catches.

The key to Reed’s future is his defense. He moves well in space on the perimeter in switch situations, and he has strong instincts around the rim when contesting shots. Those attributes made an impact for Michigan as a freshman, when the team’s scheme and connectivity was much better as a whole. This season, he was forced to hold the system up, and the team’s rough perimeter and help defense often put him in difficult spots. If Reed’s defensive drop-off ends up simply being due to the Wolverines’ utterly catastrophic situation, he should be a high-major starter next season. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

A former top-40 recruit from high school powerhouse Link Academy in Missouri, Reed had a solid freshman season as a defensive difference-maker off the bench before stepping into the starting role during the Wolverines’ disastrous 2023-24 season.

A strong, 260-pound big with quick feet and a high feel for the game, the idea was for Reed to play effectively in the post and defend. His performance this season was mixed, but it’s hard to say how much was his fault. He made more than 51 percent of his shot attempts on the block, per Synergy, and he crashed the offensive glass well to create second chances. But Reed isn’t a good leaper, so he didn’t get a ton of dunks and was contested or blocked more often on dump-offs or put-back attempts than a typical big. Additionally, because Michigan’s spacing was so bad, he was often crowded by defenders, resulting in a number of turnovers. His hands at times betrayed him, and he’d fumble easy catches.

The key to Reed’s future is his defense. He moves well in space on the perimeter in switch situations, and he has strong instincts around the rim when contesting shots. Those attributes made an impact for Michigan as a freshman, when the team’s scheme and connectivity was much better as a whole. This season, he was forced to hold the system up, and the team’s rough perimeter and help defense often put him in difficult spots. If Reed’s defensive drop-off ends up simply being due to the Wolverines’ utterly catastrophic situation, he should be a high-major starter next season. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 240

It took Huntley-Hatfield a while to become a productive college player, but the former five-star prospect has started to come into his own by focusing more on the game’s little things. Twenty five percent of Huntley-Hatfield’s shots in his first season at Tennessee were jumpers, per Synergy. That figure dropped to 22 percent in his sophom*ore season at Louisville and just 15 percent last season. The result: Huntley-Hatfield’s true shooting mark improved to an above-average 60.6 percent despite him upping his volume and becoming a bigger part of the offense.

Overall, Huntley-Hatfield averaged 12.9 points and 8.4 rebounds per game, posting eight double-doubles. Almost 60 percent of his shots came at the rim, per Synergy, and he made those at a 68 percent clip despite playing on a team with zero floor-spacing. He was a good pick-and-roll big who found soft spots in the defense, created second chances via crashing the offensive glass hard and showed an ability to take advantage in some post-up situations — though his new team should probably dial those opportunities back. He had some fun flashes as a driver from the top of the key and even made a couple of spot-up 3s.

I understand why people stopped watching Louisville. The Cardinals were a rough viewing experience with an offense that made little sense. But just as most stopped paying attention, Huntley-Hatfield started to meet some of evaluators’ early lofty expectations. Over his last 18 games this season, Huntley-Hatfield averaged 15.8 points per game. If he continues on that positive trajectory, he might be more than a starting-level big. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 240

It took Huntley-Hatfield a while to become a productive college player, but the former five-star prospect has started to come into his own by focusing more on the game’s little things. Twenty five percent of Huntley-Hatfield’s shots in his first season at Tennessee were jumpers, per Synergy. That figure dropped to 22 percent in his sophom*ore season at Louisville and just 15 percent last season. The result: Huntley-Hatfield’s true shooting mark improved to an above-average 60.6 percent despite him upping his volume and becoming a bigger part of the offense.

Overall, Huntley-Hatfield averaged 12.9 points and 8.4 rebounds per game, posting eight double-doubles. Almost 60 percent of his shots came at the rim, per Synergy, and he made those at a 68 percent clip despite playing on a team with zero floor-spacing. He was a good pick-and-roll big who found soft spots in the defense, created second chances via crashing the offensive glass hard and showed an ability to take advantage in some post-up situations — though his new team should probably dial those opportunities back. He had some fun flashes as a driver from the top of the key and even made a couple of spot-up 3s.

I understand why people stopped watching Louisville. The Cardinals were a rough viewing experience with an offense that made little sense. But just as most stopped paying attention, Huntley-Hatfield started to meet some of evaluators’ early lofty expectations. Over his last 18 games this season, Huntley-Hatfield averaged 15.8 points per game. If he continues on that positive trajectory, he might be more than a starting-level big. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 210

Martin looked like Florida Atlantic’s best player for stretches of the 2023 Final Four run. He put up 26 points in the semifinal loss to San Diego State. He followed that up by averaging 13.1 points, 5.9 rebounds and 1.6 steals per game this past season. He struggled some with his jumper, shooting 33.8 percent from 3, but that was partly due to a poor start and bad finish (missed his final 10 3s). For his career, he shoot 36.9 percent from deep. He’s at his best spotting up and attacking closeouts. He is built like a brick house and can finish through (and over) bodies at the rim. He plays much bigger than 6-2, as his rebounding numbers show. There have been times where FAU has played him at the four. He fits in just about any system because of his shooting and knowing how to space and move without the ball. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 210

Martin looked like Florida Atlantic’s best player for stretches of the 2023 Final Four run. He put up 26 points in the semifinal loss to San Diego State. He followed that up by averaging 13.1 points, 5.9 rebounds and 1.6 steals per game this past season. He struggled some with his jumper, shooting 33.8 percent from 3, but that was partly due to a poor start and bad finish (missed his final 10 3s). For his career, he shoot 36.9 percent from deep. He’s at his best spotting up and attacking closeouts. He is built like a brick house and can finish through (and over) bodies at the rim. He plays much bigger than 6-2, as his rebounding numbers show. There have been times where FAU has played him at the four. He fits in just about any system because of his shooting and knowing how to space and move without the ball. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-3Wt: 185

Larry is one of the fastest guards in college basketball. He’s built like a running back and explodes through a hole like one. He constantly is putting pressure on the rim with his speed and is able to operate under control, especially considering how fast he’s moving. When a help side defender slides up to help, he sees it and was regularly dumping the ball off to Robbie Avila. He was Indiana State’s best 3-point shooter by percentage (46.2 percent) but fourth on the team in makes. That’s because he usually only takes the wide-open ones. He needs time to get his shot off and would prefer to attack the paint, but you have to respect his jumper because he’s so accurate when he does shoot. He was Indiana State’s best defender and likes to heat up the ball. He averaged 1.5 steals per game. He’s not going to be a primary scorer, but he’ll make the most of his opportunities. He averaged 11 points and 4.8 assists. He’s capable of playing point guard and has worked a lot out of ball screens, but he’s probably best as a secondary handler. As with all the transfers coming from Indiana State, they fit best in a system like Josh Schertz’s where the floor is spread and they play off each other’s gravity. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-3Wt: 185

Larry is one of the fastest guards in college basketball. He’s built like a running back and explodes through a hole like one. He constantly is putting pressure on the rim with his speed and is able to operate under control, especially considering how fast he’s moving. When a help side defender slides up to help, he sees it and was regularly dumping the ball off to Robbie Avila. He was Indiana State’s best 3-point shooter by percentage (46.2 percent) but fourth on the team in makes. That’s because he usually only takes the wide-open ones. He needs time to get his shot off and would prefer to attack the paint, but you have to respect his jumper because he’s so accurate when he does shoot. He was Indiana State’s best defender and likes to heat up the ball. He averaged 1.5 steals per game. He’s not going to be a primary scorer, but he’ll make the most of his opportunities. He averaged 11 points and 4.8 assists. He’s capable of playing point guard and has worked a lot out of ball screens, but he’s probably best as a secondary handler. As with all the transfers coming from Indiana State, they fit best in a system like Josh Schertz’s where the floor is spread and they play off each other’s gravity. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-2Wt: 195

Boswell started at point guard on a No. 2 seed at the age of a freshman. He turns 19 this month and already has played two seasons at Arizona, so the fact that he’s already produced — 9.6 points and 3.6 assists per game — at that age is impressive. He’s best suited playing next to a more dynamic guard like Arizona had this year in Caleb Love. Boswell can play the part of initiating offense but he’s limited as a playmaker. He also struggles finishing around the basket. He shot 51.7 percent at the rim, per Synergy. He’s solid as a spot-up shooter, knocking down 66 3s at a 37.9 percent clip this year. In two seasons, he’s shot 39.2 percent from deep and 79.3 percent at the free throw line. That’s enough sample size to believe in his shot. He’s a plus defender on the ball capable of guarding bigger players because of his strength. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-2Wt: 195

Boswell started at point guard on a No. 2 seed at the age of a freshman. He turns 19 this month and already has played two seasons at Arizona, so the fact that he’s already produced — 9.6 points and 3.6 assists per game — at that age is impressive. He’s best suited playing next to a more dynamic guard like Arizona had this year in Caleb Love. Boswell can play the part of initiating offense but he’s limited as a playmaker. He also struggles finishing around the basket. He shot 51.7 percent at the rim, per Synergy. He’s solid as a spot-up shooter, knocking down 66 3s at a 37.9 percent clip this year. In two seasons, he’s shot 39.2 percent from deep and 79.3 percent at the free throw line. That’s enough sample size to believe in his shot. He’s a plus defender on the ball capable of guarding bigger players because of his strength. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 230

Mitchell is a good energy guy with plus-athleticism at 6-9. He is limited offensively because of his jump shot. His shot actually got worse from his freshman to sophom*ore season. As he freshman, he made 19-of-54 3s (35.2 percent) and shot 76.3 percent at the free-throw line. This season he went 11-of-40 (27.5 percent) from deep and made just 62.3 percent of his free throws. His shot got flatter with a pronounced hitch. There’s a lot of work to be done there in the offseason. But Mitchell did get better at learning how to attack space when defenders would sag off him. He handles it well for his size and has some burst. He also learned how to be a better cutter with his man often focused on helping off.

His numbers were still solid, averaging 11.6 points and 6.0 rebounds while making 59 percent of his 2s. He’s long enough that he could play at the center spot in smaller lineups. Duke didn’t use him much as a facilitator because it had Kyle Filipowski as the hub of its offense, but it’s feasible that’s something Mitchell could be capable of with his skill level. He’s also a switchable defender with the quickness to be part of an aggressive pick-and-roll scheme. Fit will be important for Mitchell. Ideally, he’ll be surrounded by shooters and play in an up-tempo system. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 230

Mitchell is a good energy guy with plus-athleticism at 6-9. He is limited offensively because of his jump shot. His shot actually got worse from his freshman to sophom*ore season. As he freshman, he made 19-of-54 3s (35.2 percent) and shot 76.3 percent at the free-throw line. This season he went 11-of-40 (27.5 percent) from deep and made just 62.3 percent of his free throws. His shot got flatter with a pronounced hitch. There’s a lot of work to be done there in the offseason. But Mitchell did get better at learning how to attack space when defenders would sag off him. He handles it well for his size and has some burst. He also learned how to be a better cutter with his man often focused on helping off.

His numbers were still solid, averaging 11.6 points and 6.0 rebounds while making 59 percent of his 2s. He’s long enough that he could play at the center spot in smaller lineups. Duke didn’t use him much as a facilitator because it had Kyle Filipowski as the hub of its offense, but it’s feasible that’s something Mitchell could be capable of with his skill level. He’s also a switchable defender with the quickness to be part of an aggressive pick-and-roll scheme. Fit will be important for Mitchell. Ideally, he’ll be surrounded by shooters and play in an up-tempo system. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 220

The co-AAC Player of the Year is one of the best on-the-move shooters in the portal. Youngblood averaged 15.3 points per game as a senior at South Florida and was one of the rare players to transfer up a level — from the A-Sun to the AAC — and see his scoring average increase. When he has space, he’s close to automatic from deep. He made 69 3-pointers at a 41.6 percent clip. He’s good off the catch and the bounce.

Youngblood isn’t that quick with the ball but he’s strong and bodies bounce off him. He creates separation with his strength and ability to read screens playing off the ball. He shot 42.6 percent coming off screens, per Synergy. His experience is obvious in the way he plays on both ends. Defensively, he knows where to be and does a good job contesting shots despite having short arms. He didn’t put up big assist numbers (2.1 per game) but his passes arrive on target and with some pop. He usually makes the right read and is willing to make the extra pass when his gravity pulls extra defenders. Youngblood is the type of player who gets everything out of his ability. He helped Amir Abdur-Rahim flip Kennesaw State and then South Florida, where the coach and player won the American in their first year when USF was coming off a losing season. — C.J. Moore

How he fits

If Mark wants to continue to be a primary scorer, he picked a good spot. He’ll play alongside Indiana State transfer Julian Larry, who is better as second or third options and a good enough shooter to space the floor when Mark wants to work in isolation or out of the pick and roll. There are similarities to the Texas and Arkansas offenses. Both rely on spacing the floor and running simple actions to get their scorers opportunities. With Max Abmas graduating, someone needs to step up and be willing to be that shotmaker. Mark is the leading candidate.

— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 255

This is a tough loss for a Minnesota team that did not have much depth on the interior this year. Payne is a tough, physical interior player who rebounds, hits the glass and finishes at the rim. He’s a very direct player in that way, possessing all sorts of bounce and explosive athleticism. That’s the key skill for Payne. He is one of the best big-man athletes in the country.

Offensively, almost every shot he took this year was at the rim. When he wants to or has a runway, he can get above the rim and finish. But the skill level and hands can occasionally abandon him. Still, he made almost 64 percent of his shots at the rim, per Synergy, which is solid enough. Mostly, Payne is going to play out of ball-screens and in the dunker spot, but he also posted a few times per game for Minnesota to very mixed results. The turnover rate in those situations is quite poor, and I don’t know how great I feel about him putting the ball on the ground more than once. But as a rim-runner, he has a lot of utility if another team runs a ball-screen-centric offense. He’ll also get a significant number of tip-outs and put-backs.

More than on offense though, Payne has a ton of upside on defense. He can explosively rise up to block shots, as well as guard a bit in space. He moves really well laterally for a player his size at 6-foot-9, 250 pounds. He rotates in a timely manner on the baseline and always makes his presence felt, sometimes at the expense of taking himself out of rebounding position, but the overall impact is positive.

His game never seems to slow down. If I were a coach, I’d love to invest further time and energy into him, especially if a significant basis of my offense was a well-spaced court with high-end ball-screen action where he’d have space to take off and fly.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 255

This is a tough loss for a Minnesota team that did not have much depth on the interior this year. Payne is a tough, physical interior player who rebounds, hits the glass and finishes at the rim. He’s a very direct player in that way, possessing all sorts of bounce and explosive athleticism. That’s the key skill for Payne. He is one of the best big-man athletes in the country.

Offensively, almost every shot he took this year was at the rim. When he wants to or has a runway, he can get above the rim and finish. But the skill level and hands can occasionally abandon him. Still, he made almost 64 percent of his shots at the rim, per Synergy, which is solid enough. Mostly, Payne is going to play out of ball-screens and in the dunker spot, but he also posted a few times per game for Minnesota to very mixed results. The turnover rate in those situations is quite poor, and I don’t know how great I feel about him putting the ball on the ground more than once. But as a rim-runner, he has a lot of utility if another team runs a ball-screen-centric offense. He’ll also get a significant number of tip-outs and put-backs.

More than on offense though, Payne has a ton of upside on defense. He can explosively rise up to block shots, as well as guard a bit in space. He moves really well laterally for a player his size at 6-foot-9, 250 pounds. He rotates in a timely manner on the baseline and always makes his presence felt, sometimes at the expense of taking himself out of rebounding position, but the overall impact is positive.

His game never seems to slow down. If I were a coach, I’d love to invest further time and energy into him, especially if a significant basis of my offense was a well-spaced court with high-end ball-screen action where he’d have space to take off and fly.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 222

Thiero plays incredibly hard, with reckless abandon at all times, and he’s going to try to make stuff happen just by being big, athletic and willing to throw his weight around. He averaged 7.2 points, five rebounds, one assist, nearly one steal, and 1.1 blocks, but he played injured for a portion of the season, dealing with a broken thumb along with what the team referred to as “general soreness.” The goal for him was just to bring energy and intensity, and he generally brought it in a big way.

He was one of the few Wildcats this year to consistently bring value on the defensive end. He rotated around the court with disruptive intent and attacked everything that went up on the glass. On the offensive end, his impact was more limited, but he consistently did all of the little things required. He made only 48 percent of his shots at the rim and wasn’t all that comfortable firing from 3. He needs to get better with his touch on the interior, and he has to come into next season way more comfortable firing away from 3. If those two things happen, he might be a 2025 NBA Draft pick. The tools, athleticism and motor are all there, and he seems to take real pride in defending. But unless the skills come along, he might end up as more of a role-player as a starter next season if he chooses not to return to Kentucky. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 222

Thiero plays incredibly hard, with reckless abandon at all times, and he’s going to try to make stuff happen just by being big, athletic and willing to throw his weight around. He averaged 7.2 points, five rebounds, one assist, nearly one steal, and 1.1 blocks, but he played injured for a portion of the season, dealing with a broken thumb along with what the team referred to as “general soreness.” The goal for him was just to bring energy and intensity, and he generally brought it in a big way.

He was one of the few Wildcats this year to consistently bring value on the defensive end. He rotated around the court with disruptive intent and attacked everything that went up on the glass. On the offensive end, his impact was more limited, but he consistently did all of the little things required. He made only 48 percent of his shots at the rim and wasn’t all that comfortable firing from 3. He needs to get better with his touch on the interior, and he has to come into next season way more comfortable firing away from 3. If those two things happen, he might be a 2025 NBA Draft pick. The tools, athleticism and motor are all there, and he seems to take real pride in defending. But unless the skills come along, he might end up as more of a role-player as a starter next season if he chooses not to return to Kentucky. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

We already saw one Northern Colorado transfer take college hoops by storm this season in Tennessee’s Dalton Knecht. Now, Thomas is hitting the portal, and he's also a strong candidate to shine at a high major.

The 6-foot-7 wing started his career at Loyola Chicago, but didn’t get much playing time and relocated to Greeley, Co. to jump start his career. It was a good choice. Thomas exploded this season, earning first-team All-Big Sky honors while averaging 19.7 points, 9.8 rebounds, 4.2 assists, 1.9 steals and almost a block per game. He shot 47.2 percent from the field, 33 percent on more than six 3-point attempts per game and nearly 87 percent at the free-throw line.

The sheer versatility of Thomas’ attack was most impressive. He could grab a defensive rebound, start the break in transition and become an immediate pull-up threat from 25 feet out. If that shot wasn’t available, he’d attack off the bounce and use his powerful 6-7 frame to get all the way to the rim. In halfcourt situations, he was somewhat successful in ball screens — though his decision-making still has room to improve — and thrived posting up mismatches on the block.

A few coaches have raised concerns when I ask about Thomas’ game scaling up to the high-major level. Much of his offensive success can be attributed to physical advantages he had over other Big Sky players. But it’s hard to find transfer options with Thomas’ size, athleticism, touch and playmaking instincts. I think he’s a high-major starter somewhere next year, and might be more than that if he continues to grow as a shooter. — Sam Vecenie

We already saw one Northern Colorado transfer take college hoops by storm this season in Tennessee’s Dalton Knecht. Now, Thomas is hitting the portal, and he's also a strong candidate to shine at a high major.

The 6-foot-7 wing started his career at Loyola Chicago, but didn’t get much playing time and relocated to Greeley, Co. to jump start his career. It was a good choice. Thomas exploded this season, earning first-team All-Big Sky honors while averaging 19.7 points, 9.8 rebounds, 4.2 assists, 1.9 steals and almost a block per game. He shot 47.2 percent from the field, 33 percent on more than six 3-point attempts per game and nearly 87 percent at the free-throw line.

The sheer versatility of Thomas’ attack was most impressive. He could grab a defensive rebound, start the break in transition and become an immediate pull-up threat from 25 feet out. If that shot wasn’t available, he’d attack off the bounce and use his powerful 6-7 frame to get all the way to the rim. In halfcourt situations, he was somewhat successful in ball screens — though his decision-making still has room to improve — and thrived posting up mismatches on the block.

A few coaches have raised concerns when I ask about Thomas’ game scaling up to the high-major level. Much of his offensive success can be attributed to physical advantages he had over other Big Sky players. But it’s hard to find transfer options with Thomas’ size, athleticism, touch and playmaking instincts. I think he’s a high-major starter somewhere next year, and might be more than that if he continues to grow as a shooter. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6Wt: 205

A two-year starter at Colorado, Hadley originally started his career at Northeastern before going to the junior college level for a season and then reappearing at Colorado. He’s one of those players that does a lot of things well, and it wouldn’t be unfair to call him a glue guy.

Most of his offense comes at the rim, whether via running out in transition, attacking post mismatches as a big 2-guard, cutting backdoor or driving closeouts. He crashes the glass and is a solid screener. He doesn’t take many bad shots, which is how he ended up averaging 11.6 points on only 7.3 field goal attempts per game with an impressive 63.7 true-shooting percentage.

Beyond that, Hadley is a good passer who unselfishly made the right play for star teammates K.J. Simpson and Tristan da Silva last season. He takes on tough defensive assignments and is sharp positionally off the ball, always seeming to be in the right place.

There are so many teams across the country that could use a player like Hadley. He probably won’t make an All-Conference team unless he improves as a shooter, but he is the kind of player that just helps teams win. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-6Wt: 205

A two-year starter at Colorado, Hadley originally started his career at Northeastern before going to the junior college level for a season and then reappearing at Colorado. He’s one of those players that does a lot of things well, and it wouldn’t be unfair to call him a glue guy.

Most of his offense comes at the rim, whether via running out in transition, attacking post mismatches as a big 2-guard, cutting backdoor or driving closeouts. He crashes the glass and is a solid screener. He doesn’t take many bad shots, which is how he ended up averaging 11.6 points on only 7.3 field goal attempts per game with an impressive 63.7 true-shooting percentage.

Beyond that, Hadley is a good passer who unselfishly made the right play for star teammates K.J. Simpson and Tristan da Silva last season. He takes on tough defensive assignments and is sharp positionally off the ball, always seeming to be in the right place.

There are so many teams across the country that could use a player like Hadley. He probably won’t make an All-Conference team unless he improves as a shooter, but he is the kind of player that just helps teams win. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 195

A multi-year starter at Virginia Tech, Pedulla has been extremely productive running the show as the team’s primary lead guard. He has a tight, crafty handle, and while he’s not overly shifty, he stays on balance and changes speeds effectively to get into the teeth of the defense.

He’s especially good at leveraging his ability to score at all three levels. Defenses have to be cognizant of his step-back and midrange pull-up jumpers, as well as him stopping on a dime for floaters. He can get into his step-back in a variety of ways: behind-the-legs dribbles, crossovers and more. He hasn’t made a particularly high percentage off the catch but clearly has good touch and may improve in that area in a more manageable offensive role.

It often felt like he was asked to do too much at Virginia Tech. With M.J. Collins having a poor season and teammates Hunter Cattoor and Tyler Nickel serving more as floor-spacers, Pedulla was often the sole driver of the offense. That did allow him to earn a third-team All-ACC berth with averages of 16.4 points, 4.3 rebounds, and 4.6 assists per game, but he also committed 3.3 turnovers a contest. To me, his miscues were more a function of his offensive responsibilities than any skill deficiency.

Pedulla plays with confidence and is a genuine high-major starting point guard. Ideally, he’d be paired with a strong, bigger combo guard who can generate rim pressure and set Pedulla up for more open catch-and-shoot 3s. But there are many other teams that could use a battle-tested, older, two-year starting ACC floor-general.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 195

A multi-year starter at Virginia Tech, Pedulla has been extremely productive running the show as the team’s primary lead guard. He has a tight, crafty handle, and while he’s not overly shifty, he stays on balance and changes speeds effectively to get into the teeth of the defense.

He’s especially good at leveraging his ability to score at all three levels. Defenses have to be cognizant of his step-back and midrange pull-up jumpers, as well as him stopping on a dime for floaters. He can get into his step-back in a variety of ways: behind-the-legs dribbles, crossovers and more. He hasn’t made a particularly high percentage off the catch but clearly has good touch and may improve in that area in a more manageable offensive role.

It often felt like he was asked to do too much at Virginia Tech. With M.J. Collins having a poor season and teammates Hunter Cattoor and Tyler Nickel serving more as floor-spacers, Pedulla was often the sole driver of the offense. That did allow him to earn a third-team All-ACC berth with averages of 16.4 points, 4.3 rebounds, and 4.6 assists per game, but he also committed 3.3 turnovers a contest. To me, his miscues were more a function of his offensive responsibilities than any skill deficiency.

Pedulla plays with confidence and is a genuine high-major starting point guard. Ideally, he’d be paired with a strong, bigger combo guard who can generate rim pressure and set Pedulla up for more open catch-and-shoot 3s. But there are many other teams that could use a battle-tested, older, two-year starting ACC floor-general.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 184

Johnson struggled to find playing time in his first two seasons at Ohio State, but has blossomed into a quality high-major starting point guard at South Carolina. This season, he took another solid step forward, averaging 14.1 points, four rebounds and three assists per game in the Gameco*cks’ breakout season under Lamont Paris.

Johnson is an aggressive, attack-oriented guard who can play on or off the ball. He shared lead ballhandling responsibilities with Ta’Lon Cooper, serving as more of a scorer than a distributor. He generated offense primarily through a combination of ball screens and spot ups, though he was also the Gameco*cks’ main option when sets broke down late in the shot clock.

While Johnson generally knocks down his catch-and-shoot attempts when open and can get medium-percentage looks when necessary, I don’t think he can consistently create high-efficiency shots on his own. Johnson finished just 48.1 percent of his attempts at the rim and made just 26.2 percent of his pull-up 3s. He’d be better served as an off ball player who uses the threat of his jumper to attack closeouts and get into the teeth of the defense.

Johnson is undeniably a high-major starter who can help any number of teams. He’s proven to be an experienced, steady older hand and has played in a lot of tough games in the SEC. He may even make another all-conference team. But he has enough flaws to where his new team can’t expect its offense to thrive if he’s the main cog. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 184

Johnson struggled to find playing time in his first two seasons at Ohio State, but has blossomed into a quality high-major starting point guard at South Carolina. This season, he took another solid step forward, averaging 14.1 points, four rebounds and three assists per game in the Gameco*cks’ breakout season under Lamont Paris.

Johnson is an aggressive, attack-oriented guard who can play on or off the ball. He shared lead ballhandling responsibilities with Ta’Lon Cooper, serving as more of a scorer than a distributor. He generated offense primarily through a combination of ball screens and spot ups, though he was also the Gameco*cks’ main option when sets broke down late in the shot clock.

While Johnson generally knocks down his catch-and-shoot attempts when open and can get medium-percentage looks when necessary, I don’t think he can consistently create high-efficiency shots on his own. Johnson finished just 48.1 percent of his attempts at the rim and made just 26.2 percent of his pull-up 3s. He’d be better served as an off ball player who uses the threat of his jumper to attack closeouts and get into the teeth of the defense.

Johnson is undeniably a high-major starter who can help any number of teams. He’s proven to be an experienced, steady older hand and has played in a lot of tough games in the SEC. He may even make another all-conference team. But he has enough flaws to where his new team can’t expect its offense to thrive if he’s the main cog. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Who says you can’t go home again? Johnson started his career at Ohio State and now will be returning to finish it. With Bruce Thornton, last season’s leading scorer, also returning, Ohio State may field the Big 10’s best backcourt next season. Thornton is more of a pure point guard, which allows Johnson to function in his ideal role as more of a scorer, shooter and straight-line driver.

The one downside is the Buckeyes’ backcourt figures to be a bit small with Thornton, Johnson and rising junior Roddy Gayle (assuming he returns). Freshman reserve Scotty Middleton, who brought size and on-ball defensive potential last season, has entered the transfer portal. Still, with a nucleus of Thornton, Johnson, Gayle and returning starting center Felix Okpara, Ohio State looks like a potential preseason top-25 team in Jake Diebler’s first full season in charge. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 211

Three years after transferring from Iowa State when then-coach Steve Prohm was fired, Dunbar had a big-time breakout season for the Pride in 2023-24, earning second-team All-CAA honors after averaging nearly 18 points and seven rebounds per game.

A long wing scorer, Dunbar’s shot-making will be his signature skill for a high major. Over the last two seasons, Dubar has drilled 40.1 percent of his nearly 300 3-point attempts, a terrific number for a chiseled 6-foot-7, 215-pound wing. His mechanics off the catch feature a funky load into the shooting motion from the left side, but the jumper undeniably falls. He would be an ideal floor-spacer for teams whose wings drift back and forth from the wings to the corners off the ball. While his uncommon left-side load up causes issues with his pull-up jumper, he can attack the rim on straight-line drives and is an effective finisher using his strength and balance through contact.

Dunbar made himself an even more valuable option by being especially effective in Hofstra’s games against high-major competition. He dropped 24 points on Duke while drilling seven 3s, scored 23 against St. John’s, notched 17 points against a good UNLV team, tallied 18 against a strong Princeton team and averaged 19.5 points over his two games against NCAA Tournament-bound Charleston.

He’s a high-major starter next season, and his game should scale up due to his shot-making ability. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 211

Three years after transferring from Iowa State when then-coach Steve Prohm was fired, Dunbar had a big-time breakout season for the Pride in 2023-24, earning second-team All-CAA honors after averaging nearly 18 points and seven rebounds per game.

A long wing scorer, Dunbar’s shot-making will be his signature skill for a high major. Over the last two seasons, Dubar has drilled 40.1 percent of his nearly 300 3-point attempts, a terrific number for a chiseled 6-foot-7, 215-pound wing. His mechanics off the catch feature a funky load into the shooting motion from the left side, but the jumper undeniably falls. He would be an ideal floor-spacer for teams whose wings drift back and forth from the wings to the corners off the ball. While his uncommon left-side load up causes issues with his pull-up jumper, he can attack the rim on straight-line drives and is an effective finisher using his strength and balance through contact.

Dunbar made himself an even more valuable option by being especially effective in Hofstra’s games against high-major competition. He dropped 24 points on Duke while drilling seven 3s, scored 23 against St. John’s, notched 17 points against a good UNLV team, tallied 18 against a strong Princeton team and averaged 19.5 points over his two games against NCAA Tournament-bound Charleston.

He’s a high-major starter next season, and his game should scale up due to his shot-making ability. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 185

Pegues, a hero of Furman’s upset of Virginia in the first round of the 2023 NCAA Tournament, took another leap forward this season. Last season’s Southern Conference Tournament MVP made the All-Tournament team again this season after earning first-team All-SoCon honors while averaging 18.4 points and 4.8 rebounds per game with better than a 2-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio. He showed an ability to succeed against higher-level competition, playing well in games against Belmont, Liberty, Wyoming, Arkansas and Tulane this season,

Pegues’ improvement in ball screens makes him a more valuable player in the portal. He took on more primary shot creation duties within Furman’s five-out, Princeton-inspired offense that often uses its bigs to playmake from the top of the key. He’s always been a sharp cutter in those situations, as well as a good spot-up shooter from 3. However, Pegues thrived most this season running off screens, becoming one of the toughest guards in the conference thanks to his ability to pull-up from range with simple mechanics. Furman’s offense has fairly specific reads that allowed him to make easy decisions, but I also thought he made less obvious sharp passing reads while limiting his turnovers where he could.

If he can scale his game to a higher level, Pegues is a multi-faceted playmaker who could end up starting for a team in need of a point guard. Clemson, also in South Carolina, runs an offensive scheme that makes a lot of sense for Pegues’ game.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 185

Pegues, a hero of Furman’s upset of Virginia in the first round of the 2023 NCAA Tournament, took another leap forward this season. Last season’s Southern Conference Tournament MVP made the All-Tournament team again this season after earning first-team All-SoCon honors while averaging 18.4 points and 4.8 rebounds per game with better than a 2-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio. He showed an ability to succeed against higher-level competition, playing well in games against Belmont, Liberty, Wyoming, Arkansas and Tulane this season,

Pegues’ improvement in ball screens makes him a more valuable player in the portal. He took on more primary shot creation duties within Furman’s five-out, Princeton-inspired offense that often uses its bigs to playmake from the top of the key. He’s always been a sharp cutter in those situations, as well as a good spot-up shooter from 3. However, Pegues thrived most this season running off screens, becoming one of the toughest guards in the conference thanks to his ability to pull-up from range with simple mechanics. Furman’s offense has fairly specific reads that allowed him to make easy decisions, but I also thought he made less obvious sharp passing reads while limiting his turnovers where he could.

If he can scale his game to a higher level, Pegues is a multi-faceted playmaker who could end up starting for a team in need of a point guard. Clemson, also in South Carolina, runs an offensive scheme that makes a lot of sense for Pegues’ game.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 225

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 225

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 217

Fidler was one of the best-kept secrets in the country this year. A skilled scorer at Omaha with size, shooting ability and a tight handle that allowed him to attack defenses in diverse ways, Fidler averaged 20.1 points, 6.3 rebounds and 2.6 assists this season while shooting 45 percent from the field, 35.6 percent from 3, and 85.4 percent from the line. A three-year starter, he’s one of those guys who has improved incrementally every season.

When Fidler has the ball, he prefers to get into the midrange areas or drive at the Summit League level, as opposed to settling for 3s. But I especially love the way he moves without the ball and shoots off that movement. Omaha regularly started him on the left side of the court before running him off a variety of screens — mostly pindowns into curls, with some flare actions as counters — into zoom dribble hand-off actions to get him loose. He can execute some ball-screen sets himself and also attacks heavy closeouts well. His touch is superb across all three levels, with a nice floater game, strong catch-and-shoot proficiency and an ability to fire from distance. He’s not a wild athlete, and his pull-up jumper wasn’t quite effective enough this season to imagine him as a dynamic on-ball scorer at the high-major level.

Still, Fidler is a no-doubt starter-quality player at the highest level of college hoops, with some upside to be more. It’s easy to envision him upping his 3-point rate and becoming an effective hybrid wing/forward in the right scheme. For example, the Nebraska native could slot into Greg McDermott’s Creighton scheme like Baylor Scheierman did two seasons ago when transferring from the Summit League.

— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 217

Fidler was one of the best-kept secrets in the country this year. A skilled scorer at Omaha with size, shooting ability and a tight handle that allowed him to attack defenses in diverse ways, Fidler averaged 20.1 points, 6.3 rebounds and 2.6 assists this season while shooting 45 percent from the field, 35.6 percent from 3, and 85.4 percent from the line. A three-year starter, he’s one of those guys who has improved incrementally every season.

When Fidler has the ball, he prefers to get into the midrange areas or drive at the Summit League level, as opposed to settling for 3s. But I especially love the way he moves without the ball and shoots off that movement. Omaha regularly started him on the left side of the court before running him off a variety of screens — mostly pindowns into curls, with some flare actions as counters — into zoom dribble hand-off actions to get him loose. He can execute some ball-screen sets himself and also attacks heavy closeouts well. His touch is superb across all three levels, with a nice floater game, strong catch-and-shoot proficiency and an ability to fire from distance. He’s not a wild athlete, and his pull-up jumper wasn’t quite effective enough this season to imagine him as a dynamic on-ball scorer at the high-major level.

Still, Fidler is a no-doubt starter-quality player at the highest level of college hoops, with some upside to be more. It’s easy to envision him upping his 3-point rate and becoming an effective hybrid wing/forward in the right scheme. For example, the Nebraska native could slot into Greg McDermott’s Creighton scheme like Baylor Scheierman did two seasons ago when transferring from the Summit League.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 228

Townsend is a bruiser with some skill and impressive production. He averaged 17.3 points, 8.1 rebounds and 3.1 assists per game in leading Oakland to the second round of the NCAA Tournament.

Townsend is a power forward who is strong enough to play some small-ball center. He operates a lot from the elbows and the mid-post, where likes to bully his way to the basket. He’s smart once he gets there, playing off two feet and using shot fakes or a shoulder to the chest to create space to score. He struggles some to finish over length, which we saw in Oakland’s second-round NCAA Tournament loss to NC State when he went for 30 points, but was just 9-of-22 inside the arc. He rarely shoots from outside the paint; he made 12 3s all season — two of which were against the Wolfpack — and has shot just 31.4 percent for his career.

His body type and productivity is reminiscent of former Harvard star Chris Ledlum, who averaged 18.8 points in his final season at Harvard and saw his average cut in half at St. John’s when he transferred up. Townsend could fit in the right system, much like Kansas’ K.J. Adams. Ideally, Townsend’s new team would pair him with a center who can shoot. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 228

Townsend is a bruiser with some skill and impressive production. He averaged 17.3 points, 8.1 rebounds and 3.1 assists per game in leading Oakland to the second round of the NCAA Tournament.

Townsend is a power forward who is strong enough to play some small-ball center. He operates a lot from the elbows and the mid-post, where likes to bully his way to the basket. He’s smart once he gets there, playing off two feet and using shot fakes or a shoulder to the chest to create space to score. He struggles some to finish over length, which we saw in Oakland’s second-round NCAA Tournament loss to NC State when he went for 30 points, but was just 9-of-22 inside the arc. He rarely shoots from outside the paint; he made 12 3s all season — two of which were against the Wolfpack — and has shot just 31.4 percent for his career.

His body type and productivity is reminiscent of former Harvard star Chris Ledlum, who averaged 18.8 points in his final season at Harvard and saw his average cut in half at St. John’s when he transferred up. Townsend could fit in the right system, much like Kansas’ K.J. Adams. Ideally, Townsend’s new team would pair him with a center who can shoot. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 190

The son of former NBA All-Star Peja Stojaković, Andrej was a McDonald’s All-American and an enormous get for Stanford. Much like the rest of the team, his season was hit or miss. He started strongly, averaging about 10 points per game while shooting 38 percent from 3 over his first 12 games. But he hit a freshman wall over his next 10 games in the Pac-12, averaging just six points per game while never getting into double-figures and shooting just 36 percent from the field. He showed some flashes late with impressive games against Utah and USC, but overall, his first collegiate season didn’t go according to plan.

Touted as a terrific shooter like his father, Stojaković made just 32.7 percent of his 3-point attempts last season. He has great touch and moves well off the ball, but at just 190 pounds, his frame didn’t look ready for high-major hoops last season. He needs to get in the weight room and become more capable of dealing with physicality. It would behoove him to go somewhere with a creative offensive scheme that flies its wings off screening actions and gives them off-ball options based on the defense’s coverages. Stojaković is smart and has a good feel for the game. He projects as a high-level scoring wing and floor-spacer wherever he ends up. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 190

The son of former NBA All-Star Peja Stojaković, Andrej was a McDonald’s All-American and an enormous get for Stanford. Much like the rest of the team, his season was hit or miss. He started strongly, averaging about 10 points per game while shooting 38 percent from 3 over his first 12 games. But he hit a freshman wall over his next 10 games in the Pac-12, averaging just six points per game while never getting into double-figures and shooting just 36 percent from the field. He showed some flashes late with impressive games against Utah and USC, but overall, his first collegiate season didn’t go according to plan.

Touted as a terrific shooter like his father, Stojaković made just 32.7 percent of his 3-point attempts last season. He has great touch and moves well off the ball, but at just 190 pounds, his frame didn’t look ready for high-major hoops last season. He needs to get in the weight room and become more capable of dealing with physicality. It would behoove him to go somewhere with a creative offensive scheme that flies its wings off screening actions and gives them off-ball options based on the defense’s coverages. Stojaković is smart and has a good feel for the game. He projects as a high-level scoring wing and floor-spacer wherever he ends up. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

It’s hard to find elite defensive big men in the transfer portal, so teams looking for one will be excited to see Williams, the three-time CAA Defensive Player of the Year who also won first-team All-CAA honors the past two seasons.

The British native, who boasts one of the longest wingspan in the country at 7-foot-5, is the epitome of a rim protector. He’s tremendous in drop coverage, backpedaling well and extending his arms out to take up space in the paint. Yet he also moves incredibly well for a 260-pound player, so he is capable of coming up to the level of a ball screen or even switching and staying with smaller players for a couple of slides. His rotations from the opposite side of the floor are sharp, too.

His offensive game is serviceable, though a bit limited. He can play out high in ball-screen and dribble-handoff situations. He’s an aggressive offensive rebounder and can occasionally grab-and-go on the fast break in the right situation. But while he’s comfortable shooting a lefty hook shot on the block, I’m skeptical his post-up game will translate to a high-major level.

Still, I think Williams can play at an all-conference level at a high major and wouldn’t be stunned if he gets NBA looks once he turns pro due to his defense. He’s a no-brainer for a number of schools. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

It’s hard to find elite defensive big men in the transfer portal, so teams looking for one will be excited to see Williams, the three-time CAA Defensive Player of the Year who also won first-team All-CAA honors the past two seasons.

The British native, who boasts one of the longest wingspan in the country at 7-foot-5, is the epitome of a rim protector. He’s tremendous in drop coverage, backpedaling well and extending his arms out to take up space in the paint. Yet he also moves incredibly well for a 260-pound player, so he is capable of coming up to the level of a ball screen or even switching and staying with smaller players for a couple of slides. His rotations from the opposite side of the floor are sharp, too.

His offensive game is serviceable, though a bit limited. He can play out high in ball-screen and dribble-handoff situations. He’s an aggressive offensive rebounder and can occasionally grab-and-go on the fast break in the right situation. But while he’s comfortable shooting a lefty hook shot on the block, I’m skeptical his post-up game will translate to a high-major level.

Still, I think Williams can play at an all-conference level at a high major and wouldn’t be stunned if he gets NBA looks once he turns pro due to his defense. He’s a no-brainer for a number of schools. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 193

Uzan got some NBA buzz before the season, and the thought was he could propel himself into the 2024 draft with a good performance. By that measure, he had a slightly disappointing sophom*ore season. He averaged 11.3 points and 5.6 assists per game last season, but the biggest worry is his shooting. After hitting 40.8 percent from 3 on a low volume as a freshman, his 3-point percentage dropped to 29.6 this season. His stroke looks solid, so there’s some hope that part of his game can improve.

Uzan’s size and vision are his defining attributes. He can make all the pick-and-roll reads and is strong going both left and right. He’s not a dynamic scorer, lacks blow-by speed, has struggled finishing at the rim (46 percent last season, per Synergy) and doesn’t get to the free throw line often, but he’s enough of a threat to keep defenses honest. Defensively, he has a knack for forcing turnovers, averaging 1.5 steals per game.

Uzan fits best next to a scoring combo guard who would allow him to run the offense and focus more on setting up his teammates. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 193

Uzan got some NBA buzz before the season, and the thought was he could propel himself into the 2024 draft with a good performance. By that measure, he had a slightly disappointing sophom*ore season. He averaged 11.3 points and 5.6 assists per game last season, but the biggest worry is his shooting. After hitting 40.8 percent from 3 on a low volume as a freshman, his 3-point percentage dropped to 29.6 this season. His stroke looks solid, so there’s some hope that part of his game can improve.

Uzan’s size and vision are his defining attributes. He can make all the pick-and-roll reads and is strong going both left and right. He’s not a dynamic scorer, lacks blow-by speed, has struggled finishing at the rim (46 percent last season, per Synergy) and doesn’t get to the free throw line often, but he’s enough of a threat to keep defenses honest. Defensively, he has a knack for forcing turnovers, averaging 1.5 steals per game.

Uzan fits best next to a scoring combo guard who would allow him to run the offense and focus more on setting up his teammates. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 205

Perkins is a two-year starter at Iowa who has averaged double figures in each of the last two seasons. The equation with him is simple: He’s a physical, big guard who wants to pressure the defense and use his 210-pound frame to put his shoulder into opponents while attacking the paint. He will attack in transition when the opportunity presents itself, but is also experienced enough to know when to slow down and get into the midrange, where he loves to stop and pop or take quick floaters.

More importantly, though, Perkins took a leap this year as a passer and decision-maker. His ability to slow down and hold defenders on his hip really played up, and he became more capable at forcing help and then finding his teammates on rolls or dump-off passes. He rarely turns it over as an older player, with well over a two-to-one assist-to-turnover ratio. All told, Perkins averaged 14 points, 4.4 rebounds and 4.6 assists this year while also grabbing 1.6 steals, strong numbers in a difficult league. He also improved as a catch-and-shoot player, making 37 percent of those chances, per Synergy.

Perkins can be hit or miss on the defensive end, and his close to the season was rough — he averaged just 10 points on 31 percent from the field over his last 10 games. Still, he is an obvious high-major player and starter at all but the top programs next year.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4Wt: 205

Perkins is a two-year starter at Iowa who has averaged double figures in each of the last two seasons. The equation with him is simple: He’s a physical, big guard who wants to pressure the defense and use his 210-pound frame to put his shoulder into opponents while attacking the paint. He will attack in transition when the opportunity presents itself, but is also experienced enough to know when to slow down and get into the midrange, where he loves to stop and pop or take quick floaters.

More importantly, though, Perkins took a leap this year as a passer and decision-maker. His ability to slow down and hold defenders on his hip really played up, and he became more capable at forcing help and then finding his teammates on rolls or dump-off passes. He rarely turns it over as an older player, with well over a two-to-one assist-to-turnover ratio. All told, Perkins averaged 14 points, 4.4 rebounds and 4.6 assists this year while also grabbing 1.6 steals, strong numbers in a difficult league. He also improved as a catch-and-shoot player, making 37 percent of those chances, per Synergy.

Perkins can be hit or miss on the defensive end, and his close to the season was rough — he averaged just 10 points on 31 percent from the field over his last 10 games. Still, he is an obvious high-major player and starter at all but the top programs next year.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4Wt: 190

Wagner was one of the top-rated guards in the 2023 class but did not live up to the hype as a freshman, averaging 9.9 points and 3.3 assists per game and shooting 29.2 percent from 3. Plus-minus numbers are not always the most reliable, but his were noticeably bad. Kentucky allowed 113.2 points per 100 possessions when he was on the floor and was 25 points per 100 possessions better when Wagner went to the bench, per CBB Analytics.

There’s still some hope Wagner can become a really good college player. He’s at his best when he’s looking to set up teammates. The handle and vision are his strongest attributes. He can drive either direction and favors going left even though he’s a right-handed player. He forces some tough runners and shots at the rim that hurt his efficiency, but the burst is there to get to the rim and put the defense in rotations. He was better when he drove to pass than when he drove looking to score.

His jump shot is streaky and his mechanics could use some work. He holds the ball out away from his body and then pulls it back. It’s almost like a slingshot and it doesn’t have much arc. Defensively, a lot of his issues are off the ball. He’s out of position too often and playing catchup. The Wildcats were bad as a team and many of their guys just need seasoning. Wagner just needs to get in the right system where he’ll be developed and coached.— C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-4Wt: 190

Wagner was one of the top-rated guards in the 2023 class but did not live up to the hype as a freshman, averaging 9.9 points and 3.3 assists per game and shooting 29.2 percent from 3. Plus-minus numbers are not always the most reliable, but his were noticeably bad. Kentucky allowed 113.2 points per 100 possessions when he was on the floor and was 25 points per 100 possessions better when Wagner went to the bench, per CBB Analytics.

There’s still some hope Wagner can become a really good college player. He’s at his best when he’s looking to set up teammates. The handle and vision are his strongest attributes. He can drive either direction and favors going left even though he’s a right-handed player. He forces some tough runners and shots at the rim that hurt his efficiency, but the burst is there to get to the rim and put the defense in rotations. He was better when he drove to pass than when he drove looking to score.

His jump shot is streaky and his mechanics could use some work. He holds the ball out away from his body and then pulls it back. It’s almost like a slingshot and it doesn’t have much arc. Defensively, a lot of his issues are off the ball. He’s out of position too often and playing catchup. The Wildcats were bad as a team and many of their guys just need seasoning. Wagner just needs to get in the right system where he’ll be developed and coached.— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 210

A graduate transfer, Johnson has an intriguing game that should allow him to successfully move up a level or two. Johnson averaged 14 points and 8.6 rebounds per game this season to go with 1.7 steals.

Johnson’s best skill is his ability to shoot from long range at a high volume. He drilled 36.5 percent of his nearly six 3-point attempts per game, with a number of them coming from beyond the NBA line. His mechanics are clean and pure for someone his size, whether shooting as a trailer in transition, in spot-up situations or when running pick-and-pop actions.

Most of his offense inside the arc came on the block, where Johnson poured in turnaround jumpers while repeatedly drawing fouls on drop steps. It’s hard to find players with genuine size who can score inside and step away and shoot this fluidly from the perimeter.

Throw in the fact that he rebounds well, is at least positionally aware on defense and can generate steals in passing lanes, and Johnson should be in high demand. You may not have heard about him because he played for East Carolina, but high-major teams certainly have.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 210

A graduate transfer, Johnson has an intriguing game that should allow him to successfully move up a level or two. Johnson averaged 14 points and 8.6 rebounds per game this season to go with 1.7 steals.

Johnson’s best skill is his ability to shoot from long range at a high volume. He drilled 36.5 percent of his nearly six 3-point attempts per game, with a number of them coming from beyond the NBA line. His mechanics are clean and pure for someone his size, whether shooting as a trailer in transition, in spot-up situations or when running pick-and-pop actions.

Most of his offense inside the arc came on the block, where Johnson poured in turnaround jumpers while repeatedly drawing fouls on drop steps. It’s hard to find players with genuine size who can score inside and step away and shoot this fluidly from the perimeter.

Throw in the fact that he rebounds well, is at least positionally aware on defense and can generate steals in passing lanes, and Johnson should be in high demand. You may not have heard about him because he played for East Carolina, but high-major teams certainly have.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Like Norchad Omier, Miami’s center of the last two seasons, Kidd does nearly all of his work around the rim. The difference is he’s bigger and more athletic. Whereas Omier uses his frame to carve out space, Kidd deploys length to finish. Kidd is also a bit better as a ball-screen rim-runner, which could signal Miami’s desire to change its offensive style — although Kidd did show comfort as a post finisher, too.

The big question with Kidd's addition is whether Omier will be back. The starting center on a Final Four team and two-time All-ACC pick would likely start ahead of Kidd, but I don’t see how they'd play much together unless Omier drastically improves his perimeter shot. Also, it's hard to believe Kidd would commit this early just to be a backup.

Regardless, the additions of Kidd and Brandon Johnson significantly upgrade Miami's interior depth. If Omier returns, they could form one of the better big man trios in the country. If he doesn’t, the Hurricanes may need to find another playable big man. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8Wt: 228

Godfrey could be a steal for someone because his numbers aren’t going to get him noticed. He averaged 6.1 points and 3.4 rebounds in 15.5 minutes per game. That’s a result of backing up P.J. Hall and Ian Schieffelin. Godfrey is a high-major starter-level talent. He’s an old-school four man. Most of his buckets come in tight. His father played 11 years in the NFL as a linebacker, and Godfrey benefitted from those genetics. He is strong and does a good job creating angles for post entries, then once he has the ball, he uses his shoulders to create space. He has a good feel with his back to the basket for which way to spin based on where his defender is. He scored 1.046 points per post-up, according to Synergy’s logging, which ranked 65th nationally among players who finished at least 50 post-ups.

Godfrey is a quick-twitch athlete who moves really well for his build and can rebound outside of his area. He’s quick off the floor and has the chance to be an elite rim roller. His physicality allows him to play up if necessary as a small-ball five. Clemson also played him some at the three, and he handles and passes the ball well enough to play the wing in short spurts. He’s a capable 3-point shooter but rarely takes any — 3 of 7 on the year. If he gets to the point where he’s more of a 3-point threat, he would benefit because he has a strong first step, especially if he’s guarded by a bigger player.

Defensively, Godfrey is a really good team defender and Clemson’s defensive numbers were better when he was on the floor. He has good awareness off the ball and seems to communicate well. He’s a little awkward when switched onto guards on the perimeter, but he has the lateral quickness to slide his feet and stay in front. In the post, you aren’t moving him. He’s going to hold his ground and contest. His block rate (4.5) is good for a 6-8 forward. Godfrey was a solid contributor on a team that made the Elite Eight. He had 12 points in the Elite Eight loss to Alabama, proving he can perform on a big stage. Again, the numbers do not pop but the tape does.— C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-8Wt: 228

Godfrey could be a steal for someone because his numbers aren’t going to get him noticed. He averaged 6.1 points and 3.4 rebounds in 15.5 minutes per game. That’s a result of backing up P.J. Hall and Ian Schieffelin. Godfrey is a high-major starter-level talent. He’s an old-school four man. Most of his buckets come in tight. His father played 11 years in the NFL as a linebacker, and Godfrey benefitted from those genetics. He is strong and does a good job creating angles for post entries, then once he has the ball, he uses his shoulders to create space. He has a good feel with his back to the basket for which way to spin based on where his defender is. He scored 1.046 points per post-up, according to Synergy’s logging, which ranked 65th nationally among players who finished at least 50 post-ups.

Godfrey is a quick-twitch athlete who moves really well for his build and can rebound outside of his area. He’s quick off the floor and has the chance to be an elite rim roller. His physicality allows him to play up if necessary as a small-ball five. Clemson also played him some at the three, and he handles and passes the ball well enough to play the wing in short spurts. He’s a capable 3-point shooter but rarely takes any — 3 of 7 on the year. If he gets to the point where he’s more of a 3-point threat, he would benefit because he has a strong first step, especially if he’s guarded by a bigger player.

Defensively, Godfrey is a really good team defender and Clemson’s defensive numbers were better when he was on the floor. He has good awareness off the ball and seems to communicate well. He’s a little awkward when switched onto guards on the perimeter, but he has the lateral quickness to slide his feet and stay in front. In the post, you aren’t moving him. He’s going to hold his ground and contest. His block rate (4.5) is good for a 6-8 forward. Godfrey was a solid contributor on a team that made the Elite Eight. He had 12 points in the Elite Eight loss to Alabama, proving he can perform on a big stage. Again, the numbers do not pop but the tape does.— C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 210

Kidd’s game is pretty simple. He catches and finishes well around the rim, having partnered with Sean Pedulla to form a terrific two-man game. He had 50 dunks last season and made 79 percent of his shots at the rim in total this past season, the fourth-best mark in the country among the nearly 1,000 players who took at least 100 such shots, per Synergy. Ultimately, he was one of the most improved players in the ACC this season, spiking his averages up to 13.2 points and 6.5 rebounds in 23 minutes per night.

He also showed some impressive post-up flashes and was usually effective at getting to his hook shot. He can make them with both hands, has a high release point and is patient in deploying pump fakes to set up better situations for himself.

Defensively, I have questions. His higher center of gravity hindered him at times this season and he’s nowhere near the shot-blocker he should be with his length. He seemed to regularly miss opportunities to contest from the opposite side. But it’s hard to find size in the portal, and Kidd is at least a proven high-major starter who can produce on offense. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 210

I’m fascinated to see what becomes of Petraitis. He served a specific playmaking small-ball center role for Air Force and was key in their two Mountain West upset wins last season over New Mexico and UNLV. The son of two former Oregon State players, Petraitis is an extremely intelligent player who was Air Force’s primary option. He averaged 15.7 points, 6.3 rebounds, 3.7 assists, 1.6 steals and 0.9 blocks per game last season while playing on the fourth-slowest-paced team in Division I, per KenPom.

He scores mostly as a driver and cutter, with a majority of his shot attempts coming around the basket. He made about 35 percent of his 3s, but most Mountain West teams didn’t guard him closely out there because he tends to take slow-loading set shots. But Petriatis was a maestro at hitting backdoor cuts from outside within Air Force’s offense, finding creative angles for bounce passes to teammates all across the court. He also showed an ability to deliver those passes on the move as opposed to just from a standstill position. In a more normal year for the league, as opposed to this standout one, he wouldn’t have looked out of place on an All-Mountain West team.

I’m a believer in his game translating outside of Air Force’s unique setup. Even if the Falcons didn’t win many games, Petraitis’ style is the kind that helps teams gain critical edges. I think he would be a high-value fourth option on an awesome team or a great No. 2 on a solid one.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 210

I’m fascinated to see what becomes of Petraitis. He served a specific playmaking small-ball center role for Air Force and was key in their two Mountain West upset wins last season over New Mexico and UNLV. The son of two former Oregon State players, Petraitis is an extremely intelligent player who was Air Force’s primary option. He averaged 15.7 points, 6.3 rebounds, 3.7 assists, 1.6 steals and 0.9 blocks per game last season while playing on the fourth-slowest-paced team in Division I, per KenPom.

He scores mostly as a driver and cutter, with a majority of his shot attempts coming around the basket. He made about 35 percent of his 3s, but most Mountain West teams didn’t guard him closely out there because he tends to take slow-loading set shots. But Petriatis was a maestro at hitting backdoor cuts from outside within Air Force’s offense, finding creative angles for bounce passes to teammates all across the court. He also showed an ability to deliver those passes on the move as opposed to just from a standstill position. In a more normal year for the league, as opposed to this standout one, he wouldn’t have looked out of place on an All-Mountain West team.

I’m a believer in his game translating outside of Air Force’s unique setup. Even if the Falcons didn’t win many games, Petraitis’ style is the kind that helps teams gain critical edges. I think he would be a high-value fourth option on an awesome team or a great No. 2 on a solid one.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 240

Dia was one of the breakout players across college basketball this season. After averaging just 2.6 points for Vanderbilt in the 2022-23 season, Dia went across the road to Belmont and became an immediate All-Missouri Valley contributor. He averaged 16.9 points and nearly six rebounds per game, knocked down 34 percent of his 3s as a floor-spacing big man and was a matchup nightmare at that level.

Dia moves incredibly well for a big-bodied 240-pound forward, with the capability to slash and drive around bigger players to get all the way to the rim. Yet if he has a smaller player on the block, he can put his shoulder into them and get to the basket that way. His handle is clean and he draws fouls on drives and post-ups.

His jumper is a smooth set shot that looks clean coming out of his hand. His shooting off the bounce isn’t consistent enough yet, but he can get to it off the catch, out of pick-and-pops or even the occasional step back. By the latter portion of the season, he showed some playmaking chops off the bounce. At Belmont, when he was on the court, the entire offense went through him. Honestly, he’s clearly skilled enough to play at the high-major level.

One downside to his game is he was a bit of a black hole at times this season. He has a tendency to overdribble into bad spots and settle for contested jumpers. The improved passing he showed later in the season needs to be there more consistently, and he’ll need to excise the 20-percent share of difficult shots from his diet to become a more efficient scorer.

Dia is clearly gifted, though, and has significant upside if he can find a well-spaced system that allows him to hunt driving lanes and play in space.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 240

Dia was one of the breakout players across college basketball this season. After averaging just 2.6 points for Vanderbilt in the 2022-23 season, Dia went across the road to Belmont and became an immediate All-Missouri Valley contributor. He averaged 16.9 points and nearly six rebounds per game, knocked down 34 percent of his 3s as a floor-spacing big man and was a matchup nightmare at that level.

Dia moves incredibly well for a big-bodied 240-pound forward, with the capability to slash and drive around bigger players to get all the way to the rim. Yet if he has a smaller player on the block, he can put his shoulder into them and get to the basket that way. His handle is clean and he draws fouls on drives and post-ups.

His jumper is a smooth set shot that looks clean coming out of his hand. His shooting off the bounce isn’t consistent enough yet, but he can get to it off the catch, out of pick-and-pops or even the occasional step back. By the latter portion of the season, he showed some playmaking chops off the bounce. At Belmont, when he was on the court, the entire offense went through him. Honestly, he’s clearly skilled enough to play at the high-major level.

One downside to his game is he was a bit of a black hole at times this season. He has a tendency to overdribble into bad spots and settle for contested jumpers. The improved passing he showed later in the season needs to be there more consistently, and he’ll need to excise the 20-percent share of difficult shots from his diet to become a more efficient scorer.

Dia is clearly gifted, though, and has significant upside if he can find a well-spaced system that allows him to hunt driving lanes and play in space.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-0 Wt: 175

“Boopie” Miller translated to the high-major level about as well as could have been expected after missing nearly all of the 2022-23 season at Central Michigan with a broken foot. He averaged 15.6 points, 3.5 assists and 1.4 steals for the Demon Deacons while shooting 46.4 percent from the field and 36.9 percent from 3.

On the plus side, Miller is dynamic with the ball in his hands. He plays with suddenness and has a variety of crafty moves to get by his man, including high-arcing scoop shots, up-and-unders and more. He’ll pull up from any spot within 23 feet of the hoop if he feels he has some space, but he’s certainly most confident from the midrange right now. He shot 46 percent from that area, per Synergy, and also has a nice little floater game.

So what are the downsides? Decision-making can be an adventure; there are games where he tries to play through struggles and ends up with a ton of missed shots and turnovers. His turnover rate spiked this year in conference play, some of the pull-your-hair-out variety. Finally, Miller’s size is a problem on defense. You need a scheme that will account for him on that end.

Still, Miller proved this year that he’s able to handle high-major competition while playing for a borderline at-large team. I do feel like it would behoove him to consider a return to Wake Forest, though, as I’m struggling to find a scheme that works quite as well for smaller, dynamic guards on the ball as Steve Forbes’ does.

Ht: 6-0 Wt: 175

“Boopie” Miller translated to the high-major level about as well as could have been expected after missing nearly all of the 2022-23 season at Central Michigan with a broken foot. He averaged 15.6 points, 3.5 assists and 1.4 steals for the Demon Deacons while shooting 46.4 percent from the field and 36.9 percent from 3.

On the plus side, Miller is dynamic with the ball in his hands. He plays with suddenness and has a variety of crafty moves to get by his man, including high-arcing scoop shots, up-and-unders and more. He’ll pull up from any spot within 23 feet of the hoop if he feels he has some space, but he’s certainly most confident from the midrange right now. He shot 46 percent from that area, per Synergy, and also has a nice little floater game.

So what are the downsides? Decision-making can be an adventure; there are games where he tries to play through struggles and ends up with a ton of missed shots and turnovers. His turnover rate spiked this year in conference play, some of the pull-your-hair-out variety. Finally, Miller’s size is a problem on defense. You need a scheme that will account for him on that end.

Still, Miller proved this year that he’s able to handle high-major competition while playing for a borderline at-large team. I do feel like it would behoove him to consider a return to Wake Forest, though, as I’m struggling to find a scheme that works quite as well for smaller, dynamic guards on the ball as Steve Forbes’ does.

Stats

Ht: 7-1Wt: 225

Bradshaw is the type of player that if you saw him in a workout, you’d dream big. He has a beautiful high release with a picturesque goose neck follow-through on his jumper. He moves fluidly and can play above the rim. He can finish with either hand. He’s a warmup all-star. He was a five-star who ranked fifth in his recruiting class. There’s plenty of potential there, but he still has a long way to go. Bradshaw struggled to get minutes at Kentucky, barely getting on the floor late in the year. He averaged 4.9 points and 3.3 rebounds in 13.7 minutes per game. What he does best now is operate from the dunker spot, finishing dump-offs and occasionally stepping out to shoot a jumper. He made 4-of-14 3s and 5-of-11 mid-range jumpers, per Synergy. He has no back-to-the-basket game. He finished three post-up opportunities all season (scoring once), and two of those were when he had a small guard switched onto him. On the defensive end is where he needs the most coaching. His effort and awareness aren’t great. In his defense, he played on a team that this was an issue up and down the roster. Bradshaw is old for his grade — he’s already 20 — but with three years of eligibility remaining, there’s still time for him learn how to become a productive college player. In the right system with the right coach, this could work. He just needs someone who will spend a lot of time with him in film study and rev up his motor. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 7-1Wt: 225

Bradshaw is the type of player that if you saw him in a workout, you’d dream big. He has a beautiful high release with a picturesque goose neck follow-through on his jumper. He moves fluidly and can play above the rim. He can finish with either hand. He’s a warmup all-star. He was a five-star who ranked fifth in his recruiting class. There’s plenty of potential there, but he still has a long way to go. Bradshaw struggled to get minutes at Kentucky, barely getting on the floor late in the year. He averaged 4.9 points and 3.3 rebounds in 13.7 minutes per game. What he does best now is operate from the dunker spot, finishing dump-offs and occasionally stepping out to shoot a jumper. He made 4-of-14 3s and 5-of-11 mid-range jumpers, per Synergy. He has no back-to-the-basket game. He finished three post-up opportunities all season (scoring once), and two of those were when he had a small guard switched onto him. On the defensive end is where he needs the most coaching. His effort and awareness aren’t great. In his defense, he played on a team that this was an issue up and down the roster. Bradshaw is old for his grade — he’s already 20 — but with three years of eligibility remaining, there’s still time for him learn how to become a productive college player. In the right system with the right coach, this could work. He just needs someone who will spend a lot of time with him in film study and rev up his motor. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 175

The hope was that Blocker, a former four-star and top-40 recruit, could at least be a solid backup point guard right away before stepping into the starting role as a sophom*ore. Instead, the Arkansas native struggled to see regular minutes.

He did manage to show some flashes, including a solid six-game stretch in late-November and early-December where he averaged eight points, three rebounds and two assists while shooting 64 percent from the field in 22 minutes per night. He had a 14-point game in 24 minutes against Florida in SEC play, had a couple of solid games in a row against Missouri and LSU, then played a total of 19 minutes the next three games. His minutes fluctuation was one of the stranger elements of a bizarre Arkansas season.

Blocker is a monster athlete who got to the foul line 58 times in 360 minutes. He finishes above the rim off one foot or two and maintains his balance well when absorbing contact. He passes well when drawing help, but his jumper needs to be completely reworked this summer to become a threat.

Still, it’s difficult to find backcourt athletes like this in the portal. It might take a year of development, and his floor is lower than many of the players around him on this list. But his upside is an all-conference high-major guard if things break right over the next couple of years. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 175

The hope was that Blocker, a former four-star and top-40 recruit, could at least be a solid backup point guard right away before stepping into the starting role as a sophom*ore. Instead, the Arkansas native struggled to see regular minutes.

He did manage to show some flashes, including a solid six-game stretch in late-November and early-December where he averaged eight points, three rebounds and two assists while shooting 64 percent from the field in 22 minutes per night. He had a 14-point game in 24 minutes against Florida in SEC play, had a couple of solid games in a row against Missouri and LSU, then played a total of 19 minutes the next three games. His minutes fluctuation was one of the stranger elements of a bizarre Arkansas season.

Blocker is a monster athlete who got to the foul line 58 times in 360 minutes. He finishes above the rim off one foot or two and maintains his balance well when absorbing contact. He passes well when drawing help, but his jumper needs to be completely reworked this summer to become a threat.

Still, it’s difficult to find backcourt athletes like this in the portal. It might take a year of development, and his floor is lower than many of the players around him on this list. But his upside is an all-conference high-major guard if things break right over the next couple of years. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 220

A two-year junior-college player in Washington, Ajayi transferred to Pepperdine and was theoretically a great fit at power forward next to Jevon Porter. Ajayi’s game starts with this power getting downhill. He can bowl his way to the basket in a straight line using his left shoulder to create space, and has a good handle with some shake to get to pull-ups and stepback midrange jumpers. He was a killer catch-and-shoot 3-point shooter this year, making 49 percent of his 3s in those situations. That number will drop, but he’s adding value even if he’s around 38 to 40 percent.

Ajayi’s productivity did come inefficiently for a bad team outside of his 3-point jumper. He made just 48 percent of his shots around the rim, per Synergy, and 44 percent on his midrange pull-up jumpers. His passing vision seems to only extend forward for dump-offs, not kickouts to the perimeter.

is Ajayi a good player on a bad team, or can his game scale up because of his excellent shooting? Pepperdine was such a mess that it’s hard to tell.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 220

A two-year junior-college player in Washington, Ajayi transferred to Pepperdine and was theoretically a great fit at power forward next to Jevon Porter. Ajayi’s game starts with this power getting downhill. He can bowl his way to the basket in a straight line using his left shoulder to create space, and has a good handle with some shake to get to pull-ups and stepback midrange jumpers. He was a killer catch-and-shoot 3-point shooter this year, making 49 percent of his 3s in those situations. That number will drop, but he’s adding value even if he’s around 38 to 40 percent.

Ajayi’s productivity did come inefficiently for a bad team outside of his 3-point jumper. He made just 48 percent of his shots around the rim, per Synergy, and 44 percent on his midrange pull-up jumpers. His passing vision seems to only extend forward for dump-offs, not kickouts to the perimeter.

is Ajayi a good player on a bad team, or can his game scale up because of his excellent shooting? Pepperdine was such a mess that it’s hard to tell.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Ajayi’s fit with Gonzaga makes sense, as he’s a Washington native. It’s interesting to see the Zags go for Ajayi, as he scored just 20 points on six-of-24 from the field across their two games against Pepperdine last season. Still, the Zags desperately needed a player like him who can swing between the 3 and 4 positions. With Anton Watson moving on, Jun Seok-Yeo and the injured Steele Venters were the only non-bigs on the roster taller than 6-foot-7. As long as his shooting translates, he should be an impact player for Mark Few next season.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 225

The brother of Michael and Jontay, Jevon possesses a similarly modern basketball skill set as a near 7-foot perimeter-oriented center. He averaged 16.2 points this season and is the kind of versatile offensive big that teams around the country seek.

Porter can score on the block and off dump-off passes, but he’s especially good on the perimeter. He can run through a wide variety of screening actions and dribble-hand-offs. He can reject the hand off and drive, or he can pick and pop with ease. He made less than 30 percent of his 3s this season, but the motion looks clean and pure, so I expect his percentage to go up at his next stop.

Porter needs to get stronger and become a better rebounder and defender at his next stop. It’s hard to delineate Porter’s culpability when Pepperdine’s entire defensive system was catastrophically bad, but he seemed to play a part in some coverage breakdowns. Porter will need to find the right fit and a coach that’s willing to grow with him, but he has high-major starter upside.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-11 Wt: 225

The brother of Michael and Jontay, Jevon possesses a similarly modern basketball skill set as a near 7-foot perimeter-oriented center. He averaged 16.2 points this season and is the kind of versatile offensive big that teams around the country seek.

Porter can score on the block and off dump-off passes, but he’s especially good on the perimeter. He can run through a wide variety of screening actions and dribble-hand-offs. He can reject the hand off and drive, or he can pick and pop with ease. He made less than 30 percent of his 3s this season, but the motion looks clean and pure, so I expect his percentage to go up at his next stop.

Porter needs to get stronger and become a better rebounder and defender at his next stop. It’s hard to delineate Porter’s culpability when Pepperdine’s entire defensive system was catastrophically bad, but he seemed to play a part in some coverage breakdowns. Porter will need to find the right fit and a coach that’s willing to grow with him, but he has high-major starter upside.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 215

t was a season of highs and lows for Oweh. He started the season on fire, averaging 15.7 points and 4.1 rebounds while shooting 65.5 percent from the Sooners during their 11-1 start. An aggressive, downhill attacker, Oweh was a force in transition, creating fastbreak opportunities with steals and filling lanes next to teammates to finish above the rim. Oklahoma used him in a creative way in their half-court offense, having him play more like a 4 in dribble hand-offs or using him in the dunker spot under the basket.

But the wheels came off near the end of the season. In his final 11 games prior to the Big 12 conference tournament, Oweh averaged just 6.5 points and 2.6 rebounds in only 21 minutes per game while shooting 35.4 percent from the field. His shot selection was rough, he too often recklessly drove into tough Big 12 rim protectors and began committing too many turnovers considering his small offensive role.

So which player is he? In the end, Oweh was a power-five starter who averaged 11 points and four rebounds per game while shooting 49 percent from the field and 37.7 percent from 3 while generally playing aggressive point-of-attack defense.

The fit will be more important for Oweh at his next stop than it would be for most transfers. He needs to find a team that will use him creatively and channel him into more positive situations as a transition player and driver. He also needs to be surrounded by shooting, as I’m skeptical he will duplicate his 37.3 percent figure from 3. But considering his high-level defense and toughness, I expect him to start in a high-major league next season.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 215

t was a season of highs and lows for Oweh. He started the season on fire, averaging 15.7 points and 4.1 rebounds while shooting 65.5 percent from the Sooners during their 11-1 start. An aggressive, downhill attacker, Oweh was a force in transition, creating fastbreak opportunities with steals and filling lanes next to teammates to finish above the rim. Oklahoma used him in a creative way in their half-court offense, having him play more like a 4 in dribble hand-offs or using him in the dunker spot under the basket.

But the wheels came off near the end of the season. In his final 11 games prior to the Big 12 conference tournament, Oweh averaged just 6.5 points and 2.6 rebounds in only 21 minutes per game while shooting 35.4 percent from the field. His shot selection was rough, he too often recklessly drove into tough Big 12 rim protectors and began committing too many turnovers considering his small offensive role.

So which player is he? In the end, Oweh was a power-five starter who averaged 11 points and four rebounds per game while shooting 49 percent from the field and 37.7 percent from 3 while generally playing aggressive point-of-attack defense.

The fit will be more important for Oweh at his next stop than it would be for most transfers. He needs to find a team that will use him creatively and channel him into more positive situations as a transition player and driver. He also needs to be surrounded by shooting, as I’m skeptical he will duplicate his 37.3 percent figure from 3. But considering his high-level defense and toughness, I expect him to start in a high-major league next season.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 175

Allette was one of the best freshman scorers in all of college hoops this season, averaging 17.4 points in 19 games in addition to 5.7 rebounds and 3.1 assists. He was considered a significant recruit for the Monarchs as one of Canada’s top-rated high school guards. However, Allette was kicked off the team in January for what interim coach Kieran Donohue referred to as “conduct unbecoming of a Monarch.” What that means is unclear, so teams will need to find out exactly what went wrong.

When he plays, Allette is a monster driver who constantly tries to attack the basket. He’s not overly quick, but he mixes terrific deceleration with a strong frame to ward off defenders. He will need to improve his 52.2-percent shooting mark at the rim, but for a freshman, he did a good job of getting into the teeth of the defense.

He counters that skill with stop-and-pop jumpers from mid- and 3-point range. He made 46.3 percent of his midrange pull-ups last season, per Synergy, and converted 43.6 percent of his runners, a fair number. He hit 35.4 percent of his 3s, with better numbers coming off the catch. Even with his inefficient finishing at the rim, it’s hard to find freshmen with this much scoring and shot creation capability, even at the Sun Belt level.

As one of the best scorers in the portal, I assume Allette ends up at a high-major school, though he has a wide range of potential outcomes considering Old Dominion was a bad team even while he was playing. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 175

Allette was one of the best freshman scorers in all of college hoops this season, averaging 17.4 points in 19 games in addition to 5.7 rebounds and 3.1 assists. He was considered a significant recruit for the Monarchs as one of Canada’s top-rated high school guards. However, Allette was kicked off the team in January for what interim coach Kieran Donohue referred to as “conduct unbecoming of a Monarch.” What that means is unclear, so teams will need to find out exactly what went wrong.

When he plays, Allette is a monster driver who constantly tries to attack the basket. He’s not overly quick, but he mixes terrific deceleration with a strong frame to ward off defenders. He will need to improve his 52.2-percent shooting mark at the rim, but for a freshman, he did a good job of getting into the teeth of the defense.

He counters that skill with stop-and-pop jumpers from mid- and 3-point range. He made 46.3 percent of his midrange pull-ups last season, per Synergy, and converted 43.6 percent of his runners, a fair number. He hit 35.4 percent of his 3s, with better numbers coming off the catch. Even with his inefficient finishing at the rim, it’s hard to find freshmen with this much scoring and shot creation capability, even at the Sun Belt level.

As one of the best scorers in the portal, I assume Allette ends up at a high-major school, though he has a wide range of potential outcomes considering Old Dominion was a bad team even while he was playing. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 230

Hall is a fascinating player. After weighing nearly 300 pounds in high school, Hall is now down to the 230-pound range and added real shiftiness to his game. He averaged 16.6 points and 8.1 rebounds per game and was named second-team All-Atlantic-10 last season.

His shot profile is highly specific. Of his 273 halfcourt shot attempts last season, 107 were 3-pointers, 120 were at the rim and zero were dunks, per Synergy. Even with his weight loss, he still doesn’t have a ton of bounce. Instead, he’s an undersized 4 with guard skills who repeatedly drove to the rim from behind the arc or the mid-post. Most of his nominal post-up opportunities turned into face-up drives. His handle in these situations is creative, as he strings together a lot of different crossovers and spin moves.

He countered his desire to get to the rim by catching and firing from distance when those shot became available. He has a strange lefty stroke where his left leg flares forward, but he did drill nearly 36 percent of his four 3-point attempts per game.

While Hall can get to the rim at the A-10 level, his efficiency dropped drastically against good teams. He went 3-for-13 against Tennessee, 1-for-5 against Toledo, 4-for-13 against Tulane, 1-for-4 against Richmond, 3-for-11 against Dayton and 2-for-7 against Loyola Chicago. Can his game translate to the high-major level? Can he consistently finish below the rim against better competition? Will his shot continue to fall?

He’d be an interesting target for a school who already has shooters and is looking for more frontcourt shot creation.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 230

Hall is a fascinating player. After weighing nearly 300 pounds in high school, Hall is now down to the 230-pound range and added real shiftiness to his game. He averaged 16.6 points and 8.1 rebounds per game and was named second-team All-Atlantic-10 last season.

His shot profile is highly specific. Of his 273 halfcourt shot attempts last season, 107 were 3-pointers, 120 were at the rim and zero were dunks, per Synergy. Even with his weight loss, he still doesn’t have a ton of bounce. Instead, he’s an undersized 4 with guard skills who repeatedly drove to the rim from behind the arc or the mid-post. Most of his nominal post-up opportunities turned into face-up drives. His handle in these situations is creative, as he strings together a lot of different crossovers and spin moves.

He countered his desire to get to the rim by catching and firing from distance when those shot became available. He has a strange lefty stroke where his left leg flares forward, but he did drill nearly 36 percent of his four 3-point attempts per game.

While Hall can get to the rim at the A-10 level, his efficiency dropped drastically against good teams. He went 3-for-13 against Tennessee, 1-for-5 against Toledo, 4-for-13 against Tulane, 1-for-4 against Richmond, 3-for-11 against Dayton and 2-for-7 against Loyola Chicago. Can his game translate to the high-major level? Can he consistently finish below the rim against better competition? Will his shot continue to fall?

He’d be an interesting target for a school who already has shooters and is looking for more frontcourt shot creation.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 230

Dailey is a big-time athlete, above all. A top-50 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Dailey is coming off a successful first season at Oklahoma State. He’s young, but there are an awful lot of tools to work with here. With a powerful frame, Dailey can rise up and throw down in addition to contorting his frame around defenders to finish at the basket.

He made 65 percent of his attempts at the rim, per Synergy, although that percentage did drop off substantially in the halfcourt. A lefty with real body control, Dailey has good touch inside of 15 feet and should be able to continue honing that piece of his game as he ages. Everything off the bounce for Dailey was a slash to the rim, and if he got cut off, his counter was a turnaround midrange jumper that he actually made over 50 percent of. Right now though, Dailey’s game on offense is a bit simple. He’ll flash to the midpost for jumpers or drives. He’ll spot up in the corners. Or, he’ll try to attack and get downhill toward the rim.

He’s still developing as a passer, and definitely does not seem to have a ton of shiftiness with the ball. But when you’re this big and this athletic, you don’t need a ton of it to be effective if you play in direct lines. The other fun thing that Oklahoma State did was let Dailey initiate from a standstill at the elbows and make some passes to cutters. I don’t know that I totally trust him at this point passing on the move, but he does have vision that should grow. Ultimately, Dailey is a bit of a project, but one worth investing in. He has tools that NBA teams look for and should keep developing into a plus defender. The jumper is going to be the swing skill here, though. Dailey needs to get way more comfortable as a shooter from distance to reach his ceiling.

As soon as that happens, he’ll be very impactful on a winning team. Even without it, he can give energy and effort like he did this season. The ceiling is higher than where he’s ranked on this list, but it’ll take some work this summer for him to be an immediate starter on a team that is a top-six seed in the NCAA Tournament. And with the way that college hoops is now, where immediate production is key or else the portal could beckon, that did knock him down a few spots for me.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 230

Dailey is a big-time athlete, above all. A top-50 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Dailey is coming off a successful first season at Oklahoma State. He’s young, but there are an awful lot of tools to work with here. With a powerful frame, Dailey can rise up and throw down in addition to contorting his frame around defenders to finish at the basket.

He made 65 percent of his attempts at the rim, per Synergy, although that percentage did drop off substantially in the halfcourt. A lefty with real body control, Dailey has good touch inside of 15 feet and should be able to continue honing that piece of his game as he ages. Everything off the bounce for Dailey was a slash to the rim, and if he got cut off, his counter was a turnaround midrange jumper that he actually made over 50 percent of. Right now though, Dailey’s game on offense is a bit simple. He’ll flash to the midpost for jumpers or drives. He’ll spot up in the corners. Or, he’ll try to attack and get downhill toward the rim.

He’s still developing as a passer, and definitely does not seem to have a ton of shiftiness with the ball. But when you’re this big and this athletic, you don’t need a ton of it to be effective if you play in direct lines. The other fun thing that Oklahoma State did was let Dailey initiate from a standstill at the elbows and make some passes to cutters. I don’t know that I totally trust him at this point passing on the move, but he does have vision that should grow. Ultimately, Dailey is a bit of a project, but one worth investing in. He has tools that NBA teams look for and should keep developing into a plus defender. The jumper is going to be the swing skill here, though. Dailey needs to get way more comfortable as a shooter from distance to reach his ceiling.

As soon as that happens, he’ll be very impactful on a winning team. Even without it, he can give energy and effort like he did this season. The ceiling is higher than where he’s ranked on this list, but it’ll take some work this summer for him to be an immediate starter on a team that is a top-six seed in the NCAA Tournament. And with the way that college hoops is now, where immediate production is key or else the portal could beckon, that did knock him down a few spots for me.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-0 Wt: 175

North Texas went back to the junior-college well to find Edwards, a creative scoring guard who earned first-team All-AAC honors while averaging 19.1 points per game this season. Playing next to a bigger wing playmaker in Rubin Jones, Edwards was able to be himself. He uses nasty hesitations and hang-dribble-crossover combinations to get separation from defenders, whether going toward the rim or backward for stepback jumpers. By stringing together multiple moves, Edwards gets defenders stuck on their heels when trying to contest him.

His stepback game especially stood out. Though Edwards only made 27.4 percent of his step-back 3s last season, he did convert 48 percent of his pull-up midrange jumpers, indicating he has real touch even when heavily guarded and operating on the move. He can play off-ball, driving well to the rim on heavy closeouts and hitting catch-and-shoot 3s at a 37 percent clip, per Synergy.

Ultimately, I buy Edwards’ ability to separate from his man and score at the high-major level. He had some monster scoring games against good teams such as Seton Hall, Florida Atlantic and Boise State. His gifts are real, even if it’d be nice if he’d improve as a passer and cut down on some of his more difficult shots.

He’s not going to bring much else to the table, so he’s probably best as a sixth man unless a high-major can pair him with a big initiator like North Texas did. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-0 Wt: 175

North Texas went back to the junior-college well to find Edwards, a creative scoring guard who earned first-team All-AAC honors while averaging 19.1 points per game this season. Playing next to a bigger wing playmaker in Rubin Jones, Edwards was able to be himself. He uses nasty hesitations and hang-dribble-crossover combinations to get separation from defenders, whether going toward the rim or backward for stepback jumpers. By stringing together multiple moves, Edwards gets defenders stuck on their heels when trying to contest him.

His stepback game especially stood out. Though Edwards only made 27.4 percent of his step-back 3s last season, he did convert 48 percent of his pull-up midrange jumpers, indicating he has real touch even when heavily guarded and operating on the move. He can play off-ball, driving well to the rim on heavy closeouts and hitting catch-and-shoot 3s at a 37 percent clip, per Synergy.

Ultimately, I buy Edwards’ ability to separate from his man and score at the high-major level. He had some monster scoring games against good teams such as Seton Hall, Florida Atlantic and Boise State. His gifts are real, even if it’d be nice if he’d improve as a passer and cut down on some of his more difficult shots.

He’s not going to bring much else to the table, so he’s probably best as a sixth man unless a high-major can pair him with a big initiator like North Texas did. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 207

The way high majors evaluate Kugel after his season will be among the most fascinating things to track in the portal this year.

The 6-foot-5 scoring wing is arguably the best athlete in all of college basketball. No, I’m not exaggerating. Few players possess his blend of power, explosiveness and coordination. He’s built like an NBA player and moves like one. His first step is lethal and he is able to bend his body to leverage that explosiveness. Many, including me, thought had a shot to be a 2024 first-round NBA Draft pick if he developed properly. He was coming off one of the most impressive closing stretches of any freshman in 2022-23, averaging 17.3 points in SEC play while shooting 49.6 percent from the field and 39.6 percent from 3.

But man, did Kugel have a bad season. He averaged just 9.2 points, 3.5 rebounds and 1.5 assists per game and was removed from the Gators’ starting lineup after 11 games. His shot selection and decision-making during that time were horrendous, and he only made 39.4 percent of his field goals and 31.2 percent of his 3s over the course of the season while committing nearly two turnovers in 23 minutes per game. Even if bigs Tyrese Samuel and Micah Handlogten clogged the paint on Kugel’s drives, his reads weren’t good enough. Worse, he let his offensive struggles affect his defense, though he at least brought more energy later in the season.

We have Kugel ranked here based mostly on his 2023-24 performance, but his upside is genuinely tantalizing. I bet a big school takes a swing. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 207

The way high majors evaluate Kugel after his season will be among the most fascinating things to track in the portal this year.

The 6-foot-5 scoring wing is arguably the best athlete in all of college basketball. No, I’m not exaggerating. Few players possess his blend of power, explosiveness and coordination. He’s built like an NBA player and moves like one. His first step is lethal and he is able to bend his body to leverage that explosiveness. Many, including me, thought had a shot to be a 2024 first-round NBA Draft pick if he developed properly. He was coming off one of the most impressive closing stretches of any freshman in 2022-23, averaging 17.3 points in SEC play while shooting 49.6 percent from the field and 39.6 percent from 3.

But man, did Kugel have a bad season. He averaged just 9.2 points, 3.5 rebounds and 1.5 assists per game and was removed from the Gators’ starting lineup after 11 games. His shot selection and decision-making during that time were horrendous, and he only made 39.4 percent of his field goals and 31.2 percent of his 3s over the course of the season while committing nearly two turnovers in 23 minutes per game. Even if bigs Tyrese Samuel and Micah Handlogten clogged the paint on Kugel’s drives, his reads weren’t good enough. Worse, he let his offensive struggles affect his defense, though he at least brought more energy later in the season.

We have Kugel ranked here based mostly on his 2023-24 performance, but his upside is genuinely tantalizing. I bet a big school takes a swing. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Kugel immediately gives the Jayhawks an infusion of backcourt athleticism they often lacked last season, even with Elmarko Jackson and Johnny Furphy playing out in transition.

The backcourt for Kansas is starting to take shape in an intriguing way. Dajuan Harris — assuming he returns — is the table-setter and a stalwart, national championship-winning point guard. Transfer commitment Zeke Mayo provides the pull-up shooting threat the Jayhawks lacked last season. Now. Kugel adds a dynamic, open-floor athlete to the mix.

The keys for Kugel will be the same as they were for Florida last season: He needs to exhibit better decision-making and shot selection. His aimless drives into traffic can’t continue at Kansas, especially if post scorer Hunter Dickinson returns. This is a big offseason for Kugel. He has all of the tools to be an NBA player, but he needs to start putting them together. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8Wt: 205

Kent is the perfect glue guy. He played the four for the Sycamores and was happily the fifth option. He knew how to play off his teammates, who could all handle, pass and shoot, and he was an efficiency all-star, finishing with the third-highest offensive rating (135.3) in college basketball. He made the most of his opportunities, averaging 13.5 points and 8.1 rebounds per game. He is an elite cutter and scored 5.6 points per game off cuts alone, best in college hoops, per Synergy. He’s made himself into a shooter. He was sub-30 from 3 his first three seasons but shot 36.6 percent this season on 82 attempts. Defensively, he’s solid. Long and strong enough to deal with post players and also laterally quick enough to defend wings. Just an easy player to play with and know he’s going to be in the right spots. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-8Wt: 205

Kent is the perfect glue guy. He played the four for the Sycamores and was happily the fifth option. He knew how to play off his teammates, who could all handle, pass and shoot, and he was an efficiency all-star, finishing with the third-highest offensive rating (135.3) in college basketball. He made the most of his opportunities, averaging 13.5 points and 8.1 rebounds per game. He is an elite cutter and scored 5.6 points per game off cuts alone, best in college hoops, per Synergy. He’s made himself into a shooter. He was sub-30 from 3 his first three seasons but shot 36.6 percent this season on 82 attempts. Defensively, he’s solid. Long and strong enough to deal with post players and also laterally quick enough to defend wings. Just an easy player to play with and know he’s going to be in the right spots. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-11Wt: 205

Last offseason, I wrote the old Fran Fraschilla line about Miller: he’s a year away from being a year away. By that math, we still have one more year until Miller breaks out, so look out 2025-26. Miller has been at his best playing international basketball for Spain. He underwhelmed at Florida State, where he showed up midway through the 2022-23 season. In his first full season this year, he averaged 7.6 points, 1.4 assists and 4.9 rebounds in 24.8 minutes per game on a middling ACC team. It’s easy to see the potential because he doesn’t move like the normal 6-11 guy. He can handle, pass and has what looks like a workable jumper. The shooting has yet to really come through, however. He’s shot 28.2 percent from deep in his two seasons at FSU, and he forces some questionable shots considering his percentages. Miller did try to play with more physicality as a sophom*ore. He still needs to add strength, and he wasn’t always able to get where he wanted to go because he’s just not strong enough yet. He also had a tendency to just drop his shoulder and get called for a charge. He’s turnover prone (1.5 per game) and needs to make better decisions with the ball. His defensive metrics did approve drastically, likely thanks to him adding some strength. His length and skill should still generate high-major interest. Maybe some day we see it all come together. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-11Wt: 205

Last offseason, I wrote the old Fran Fraschilla line about Miller: he’s a year away from being a year away. By that math, we still have one more year until Miller breaks out, so look out 2025-26. Miller has been at his best playing international basketball for Spain. He underwhelmed at Florida State, where he showed up midway through the 2022-23 season. In his first full season this year, he averaged 7.6 points, 1.4 assists and 4.9 rebounds in 24.8 minutes per game on a middling ACC team. It’s easy to see the potential because he doesn’t move like the normal 6-11 guy. He can handle, pass and has what looks like a workable jumper. The shooting has yet to really come through, however. He’s shot 28.2 percent from deep in his two seasons at FSU, and he forces some questionable shots considering his percentages. Miller did try to play with more physicality as a sophom*ore. He still needs to add strength, and he wasn’t always able to get where he wanted to go because he’s just not strong enough yet. He also had a tendency to just drop his shoulder and get called for a charge. He’s turnover prone (1.5 per game) and needs to make better decisions with the ball. His defensive metrics did approve drastically, likely thanks to him adding some strength. His length and skill should still generate high-major interest. Maybe some day we see it all come together. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 225

A McDonald’s All-American and top-20 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Biliew struggled to establish himself during his freshman season. He played just 7.4 minutes per game in 20 games, dealt with back spasms late in the campaign and scored just six points total in the 2024 calendar year.

Beyond his back issues, Biliew's skill level did not look up to par. He plays hard all the time and has athletic gifts, but was such an offensive non-factor that it was hard for the Cyclones to have him on the court. As is the case with many freshman, it wasn’t always clear he was in the right spot on the court all the time.

As a former five-star recruit, Biliew will have a number of options at his disposal. But teams must ask themselves if they know his exact best role. Is he a 4 who can play on the perimeter after a summer of improving his jumper? If so, his effort, rebounding and defensive potential could be game-altering. But if his skills don't improve and he's instead more of a high-energy, undersized 5, he’s less valuable. There’s not much to take away from this season’s tape, so it will be critical for teams to work through the injury factor, his team context and more.

I’ll also just note that it would be smart for Biliew to consider returning to Iowa State. The graduations of Robert Jones, Tre King and Hason Ward would open up minutes for Biliew, even though the Cyclones already brought in Charlotte's Dishon Jackson as a transfer center. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 225

A McDonald’s All-American and top-20 recruit in the 2023 recruiting class, Biliew struggled to establish himself during his freshman season. He played just 7.4 minutes per game in 20 games, dealt with back spasms late in the campaign and scored just six points total in the 2024 calendar year.

Beyond his back issues, Biliew's skill level did not look up to par. He plays hard all the time and has athletic gifts, but was such an offensive non-factor that it was hard for the Cyclones to have him on the court. As is the case with many freshman, it wasn’t always clear he was in the right spot on the court all the time.

As a former five-star recruit, Biliew will have a number of options at his disposal. But teams must ask themselves if they know his exact best role. Is he a 4 who can play on the perimeter after a summer of improving his jumper? If so, his effort, rebounding and defensive potential could be game-altering. But if his skills don't improve and he's instead more of a high-energy, undersized 5, he’s less valuable. There’s not much to take away from this season’s tape, so it will be critical for teams to work through the injury factor, his team context and more.

I’ll also just note that it would be smart for Biliew to consider returning to Iowa State. The graduations of Robert Jones, Tre King and Hason Ward would open up minutes for Biliew, even though the Cyclones already brought in Charlotte's Dishon Jackson as a transfer center. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

A multi-time transfer who started his career at Mississippi State before going to Kansas State, Carter is a battle-tested Big 12 guard who became a more primary option last season to mixed results. As a sophom*ore in 2022-23, Carter was fifth starter who played 26 minutes a night and focused on tough defensive assignments for an excellent Elite 8 team. His defense, by and large, was there this year too.

But his attempt to take on a larger offensive role next to Tylor Perry was a roller coaster. He had big games, such as a 21-point performance in the Wildcats’ end-of-season win against Iowa State, and had a six-game stretch in January where he averaged 16.5 points while shooting 48.5 percent from the field and 42.4 percent from 3. But he also shot his team out of games, going 1-for-7 against TCU, 2-for-12 against Oklahoma, 2-for-10 against Texas and 1-for-7 against Kansas in four losses that would have substantially helped Kansas State’s bubble profile. In total, Carter averaged 14.6 points, five rebounds and 2.6 assists, but shot just 39.1 percent from the field and 30.9 percent from 3.

Carter is fast enough to push the game in transition and is a shifty driver when using Euro steps and when splitting ball screens. But he’s not a good enough shooter to have a significant offensive role on an NCAA Tournament-caliber high-major team. His defense makes him a valuable player who can start at this level, but he’ll either need to scale back his usage or become a much better shooter.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

A multi-time transfer who started his career at Mississippi State before going to Kansas State, Carter is a battle-tested Big 12 guard who became a more primary option last season to mixed results. As a sophom*ore in 2022-23, Carter was fifth starter who played 26 minutes a night and focused on tough defensive assignments for an excellent Elite 8 team. His defense, by and large, was there this year too.

But his attempt to take on a larger offensive role next to Tylor Perry was a roller coaster. He had big games, such as a 21-point performance in the Wildcats’ end-of-season win against Iowa State, and had a six-game stretch in January where he averaged 16.5 points while shooting 48.5 percent from the field and 42.4 percent from 3. But he also shot his team out of games, going 1-for-7 against TCU, 2-for-12 against Oklahoma, 2-for-10 against Texas and 1-for-7 against Kansas in four losses that would have substantially helped Kansas State’s bubble profile. In total, Carter averaged 14.6 points, five rebounds and 2.6 assists, but shot just 39.1 percent from the field and 30.9 percent from 3.

Carter is fast enough to push the game in transition and is a shifty driver when using Euro steps and when splitting ball screens. But he’s not a good enough shooter to have a significant offensive role on an NCAA Tournament-caliber high-major team. His defense makes him a valuable player who can start at this level, but he’ll either need to scale back his usage or become a much better shooter.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Carter is an excellent get in what could be an important season for Matt McMahon at LSU. He’s a good creator from the wing and a physical defender, which is something that the team will lose with wing Jordan Wright graduating. The odds are that Carter will be asked to be a secondary creator in the backcourt, which is something he is capable of accomplishing. He’ll be a legitimate starter and should fit well within McMahon’s scheme, where it’s incumbent upon off-guards to slash and take driving lanes given to them after that initial screen.

The question for LSU is whether or not they will need a lead guard or if it will be Jalen Cook. Cook missed the final 10 games of the Tigers’ season, with at least a number of those being due to a suspension for what McMahon called a “failure to meet the standards that I have in place for the program.” In the 13 games he played, he averaged 15.6 points and looked the part of a high-major point guard after transferring back to LSU from Tulane. Cook still has a year of eligibility left, and he hasn’t announced any transfer plans. But we never got final clarity on that end-of-year suspension, so we’re keeping our eyes open to see McMahon’s plans are there.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3Wt: 185

You know what you’re getting in Kriisa. He’s an elite shooter, especially off the catch (49.4 percent this year, per Synergy) and he can run an offense, knowing the pick-and-roll reads and when to pass ahead in transition. He was the floor general on back-to-back top 10 offenses at Arizona and then put up his best scoring numbers of his career this year on a mediocre West Virginia team, averaging 11 points and shooting a career-best 42.4 percent from 3. At his best, Kriisa plays with a swagger that rubs off on his teammates. He needs to play next to a more dynamic guard who can get into the teeth of the defense and put pressure on the rim, because that’s where he struggles. He’s not going to get a lot of paint touches. He barely ever gets to the rim. He’s an average defender and can struggle at the point of attack, but he is experienced and knows how to play. And there aren’t many shooters who can match him. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-3Wt: 185

You know what you’re getting in Kriisa. He’s an elite shooter, especially off the catch (49.4 percent this year, per Synergy) and he can run an offense, knowing the pick-and-roll reads and when to pass ahead in transition. He was the floor general on back-to-back top 10 offenses at Arizona and then put up his best scoring numbers of his career this year on a mediocre West Virginia team, averaging 11 points and shooting a career-best 42.4 percent from 3. At his best, Kriisa plays with a swagger that rubs off on his teammates. He needs to play next to a more dynamic guard who can get into the teeth of the defense and put pressure on the rim, because that’s where he struggles. He’s not going to get a lot of paint touches. He barely ever gets to the rim. He’s an average defender and can struggle at the point of attack, but he is experienced and knows how to play. And there aren’t many shooters who can match him. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 175

Davis moved to Butler last season after earning first-team All-Big West honors at UC Irvine in 2022-23, and his game translated about as well as Bulldogs coach Thad Matta could have expected. Davis started all 33 games this season as the shooting guard next to Posh Alexander,averaging 13.5 points per game on 43 percent from the field, 35.1 percent from 3 and 95 percent from the free-throw line. (Don’t look sideways at that 3-point percentage; Davis’ shot diet had a high degree of difficulty.) He was the team’s most efficient source of offense for the first two-thirds of the season.

Davis has great feel for finding the dead spaces in the defense. He took 50 3-pointers off screens this season and made them at a 40 percent clip, per Synergy. Butler also used him in dribble-hand-off actions, where he’d launch and connect if the defense went under the screen. He’s also fast, and makes himself faster leveraging the threat of his shot to get all the way to the rim and finish. He made about 60 percent of his shots at the rim and about 54 percent of his floater-range shots as well.

Davis did have issues pulling up off the dribble, as he hit only 22.2 percent of those shots from 3 and only 26.7 percent from midrange. He also tailed off late, averaging just 10.9 points and 3.7 assists per game while shooting 38 percent from the field and 26 percent from 3 in the team’s 2-7 run to close the season. Opponents seemed to have a better feel for Davis and Butler’s offense the second time around. It’s possible Davis might fit better on a team with more frontcourt offensive punch. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 175

Davis moved to Butler last season after earning first-team All-Big West honors at UC Irvine in 2022-23, and his game translated about as well as Bulldogs coach Thad Matta could have expected. Davis started all 33 games this season as the shooting guard next to Posh Alexander,averaging 13.5 points per game on 43 percent from the field, 35.1 percent from 3 and 95 percent from the free-throw line. (Don’t look sideways at that 3-point percentage; Davis’ shot diet had a high degree of difficulty.) He was the team’s most efficient source of offense for the first two-thirds of the season.

Davis has great feel for finding the dead spaces in the defense. He took 50 3-pointers off screens this season and made them at a 40 percent clip, per Synergy. Butler also used him in dribble-hand-off actions, where he’d launch and connect if the defense went under the screen. He’s also fast, and makes himself faster leveraging the threat of his shot to get all the way to the rim and finish. He made about 60 percent of his shots at the rim and about 54 percent of his floater-range shots as well.

Davis did have issues pulling up off the dribble, as he hit only 22.2 percent of those shots from 3 and only 26.7 percent from midrange. He also tailed off late, averaging just 10.9 points and 3.7 assists per game while shooting 38 percent from the field and 26 percent from 3 in the team’s 2-7 run to close the season. Opponents seemed to have a better feel for Davis and Butler’s offense the second time around. It’s possible Davis might fit better on a team with more frontcourt offensive punch. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 200

A 6-foot-3 scoring guard who has added more to his skill set each season, the Bloomington, Ind. native was a second-team All-Missouri Valley selection this season after averaging 14.5 points, 3.4 rebounds and 2.9 assists per game.

Though he’s improved as a driver and playmaker, his game is predicated off the threat of his jumper. Hickman drilled 40.2 percent of his nearly six 3-point attempts per game this season, including a 46.2 percent mark on catch-and-shoot 3s. He cannot be left open and will hunt shots off screens when guarded closely, using his improved craft in ball screens and dribble hand-offs. He’s not quite a point guard, but he’s a good enough secondary ballhandler to find success at the high-major level, much like Cormac Ryan has for North Carolina this season.

I know of one team in the Big Ten that happens to be located in Hickman’s home town and desperately need shooters despite being located in a state with arguably the deepest pool of shooting prospects in the country. No pressure, Mike Woodson. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 200

A 6-foot-3 scoring guard who has added more to his skill set each season, the Bloomington, Ind. native was a second-team All-Missouri Valley selection this season after averaging 14.5 points, 3.4 rebounds and 2.9 assists per game.

Though he’s improved as a driver and playmaker, his game is predicated off the threat of his jumper. Hickman drilled 40.2 percent of his nearly six 3-point attempts per game this season, including a 46.2 percent mark on catch-and-shoot 3s. He cannot be left open and will hunt shots off screens when guarded closely, using his improved craft in ball screens and dribble hand-offs. He’s not quite a point guard, but he’s a good enough secondary ballhandler to find success at the high-major level, much like Cormac Ryan has for North Carolina this season.

I know of one team in the Big Ten that happens to be located in Hickman’s home town and desperately need shooters despite being located in a state with arguably the deepest pool of shooting prospects in the country. No pressure, Mike Woodson. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 192

Clary was Penn State’s leading scorer this season until he was dismissed from the program in February for reasons coach Mike Rhoades has kept to himself. Teams will want to do their own due diligence on what happened after Clary got elbowed in the face against Minnesota on Jan. 27. He missed the next two games and played drastically fewer minutes in the following three before Rhoades dismissed him.

When Clary was at his best, he was a dynamic scoring guard who drilled 37.7 percent of his 3s and used the threat of his shot to attack defenses. He has a unique gift for being able to change directions with the ball while seemingly at full speed. He’s shot just 51 percent on shots at the rim in halfcourt situations, per Synergy, but makes up for his poor finishing with a dynamic floater game. He loves to get into the midrange areas for pull-up jumpers, fading away from awkward angles or using his pivot foot to create separation. He has some passing ability, as evidenced by his 3.8 assists per game, but is more of a score-first guard.

I will note that Penn State was better without him this season. According to Bart Torvik’s rating system, Penn State was the 102nd-best team in the country as of Jan. 27 and 51st from that point on. The biggest difference was on defense, where the team looked much more cohesive. While I wouldn’t attribute all of that improvement to Clary’s absence, he was quite ambivalent on that end of the floor.

If he’s willing to put in the effort to defend, he’s a clear high-major difference-maker. If he prefers to be ball-dominant and less defensively inclined, schools at the AAC and Atlantic-10 level make more sense for him. He’s one of the most talented players to hit the portal this year, but must be willing to focus on the details to reach his ceiling.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 192

Clary was Penn State’s leading scorer this season until he was dismissed from the program in February for reasons coach Mike Rhoades has kept to himself. Teams will want to do their own due diligence on what happened after Clary got elbowed in the face against Minnesota on Jan. 27. He missed the next two games and played drastically fewer minutes in the following three before Rhoades dismissed him.

When Clary was at his best, he was a dynamic scoring guard who drilled 37.7 percent of his 3s and used the threat of his shot to attack defenses. He has a unique gift for being able to change directions with the ball while seemingly at full speed. He’s shot just 51 percent on shots at the rim in halfcourt situations, per Synergy, but makes up for his poor finishing with a dynamic floater game. He loves to get into the midrange areas for pull-up jumpers, fading away from awkward angles or using his pivot foot to create separation. He has some passing ability, as evidenced by his 3.8 assists per game, but is more of a score-first guard.

I will note that Penn State was better without him this season. According to Bart Torvik’s rating system, Penn State was the 102nd-best team in the country as of Jan. 27 and 51st from that point on. The biggest difference was on defense, where the team looked much more cohesive. While I wouldn’t attribute all of that improvement to Clary’s absence, he was quite ambivalent on that end of the floor.

If he’s willing to put in the effort to defend, he’s a clear high-major difference-maker. If he prefers to be ball-dominant and less defensively inclined, schools at the AAC and Atlantic-10 level make more sense for him. He’s one of the most talented players to hit the portal this year, but must be willing to focus on the details to reach his ceiling.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Clary is an extremely skilled player, and Mississippi State coach Chris Jans has a strong track record of success when taking chances on players at second stops — likely a function of his long junior college history. At first glance, you might have some concerns on how Clary and star 5-foot-10 guard Josh Hubbard fit. Hubbard was one of the best freshmen in the SEC this year, and has earned the right to have the ball in his hands.

However, Jans teams have always been at their best with two smaller, creative guards. This year, Dashawn Davis and Shakeel Moore played regularly with Hubbard on the team’s No. 8 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Last year, it was Davis and Moore together on their NCAA Tournament team. At New Mexico State, it was AJ Harris plus a mix of Terrell Brown, Sidy N’Dir, Keyon Jones and other small players on their tournament teams. Both Hubbard and Clary are tremendous scorers of the basketball and will get a lot of freedom to play with the ball in their hands.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 230

Kyle is a tremendous athlete who threw down 101 dunks this year, per Synergy, on his way to 13.1 points while shooting 62.3 percent from the field. He was named first team All-Summit League this year for the Jackrabbits, who made the NCAA Tournament.

Everything with Kyle is forceful. He gets off the ground quickly, using his long arms to punish the rim. Almost all of his shots come around the basket, where South Dakota State largely used him on the block or out of the dunker spot. He shouldn’t expect many post touches at his next stop, but he had some fun moments as a rim-runner in ball screens and should be able to catch and finish dump-off passes. He runs the court well in transition and crushes the offensive glass.

But teams recruiting Kyle are doing so for his potential defensive impact. Kyle was the Summer League Defensive Player of the Year last season, averaging 1.7 blocks per game. His activity was the key reason the Jackrabbits had the best 2-point defense in the league.

It doesn’t hurt that he’s coming off one of his best games of the season in the NCAA Tournament, when he notched 14 points, seven rebounds and four assists against Iowa State. The Cyclones make sense as a destination for Kyle given the close relationship between the South Dakota State and Iowa State staffs and the Cyclones’ need on the interior.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 230

Kyle is a tremendous athlete who threw down 101 dunks this year, per Synergy, on his way to 13.1 points while shooting 62.3 percent from the field. He was named first team All-Summit League this year for the Jackrabbits, who made the NCAA Tournament.

Everything with Kyle is forceful. He gets off the ground quickly, using his long arms to punish the rim. Almost all of his shots come around the basket, where South Dakota State largely used him on the block or out of the dunker spot. He shouldn’t expect many post touches at his next stop, but he had some fun moments as a rim-runner in ball screens and should be able to catch and finish dump-off passes. He runs the court well in transition and crushes the offensive glass.

But teams recruiting Kyle are doing so for his potential defensive impact. Kyle was the Summer League Defensive Player of the Year last season, averaging 1.7 blocks per game. His activity was the key reason the Jackrabbits had the best 2-point defense in the league.

It doesn’t hurt that he’s coming off one of his best games of the season in the NCAA Tournament, when he notched 14 points, seven rebounds and four assists against Iowa State. The Cyclones make sense as a destination for Kyle given the close relationship between the South Dakota State and Iowa State staffs and the Cyclones’ need on the interior.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2Wt: 195

Which version of Mashburn should his new team expect to get? He was arguably the foundational piece of New Mexico’s rebirth under Richard Pitino in his first two seasons. In 2022-23, Mashburn was a first-team All-Mountain West performer, averaging 19.1 points per game and drilling 38.2 percent of his 3s. The season before, he averaged 18.2 points and was third-team All-MWC. But Mashburn took a step back this season, falling behind Donovan Dent and Jaelen House in the pecking order while scoring 14.1 points per game on just 36 percent from the field.

A combo guard, Mashburn can fill it up once he gets going, but has never been consistent beyond the arc as he has been inside it. Mashburn wants to live in the 10-to-15-foot range around the elbows and at least made 35 percent of his 212 open catch-and-shoot 3s over the past two seasons, per Synergy. But his pull-up 3-point numbers haven’t been good enough, nor has he consistently finished well around the rim. Every shot he takes around the basket seems to have a high degree of difficulty.

Mashburn’s aggressiveness in hunting shots has value, and it should translate to the high-major level due to his decisiveness and experience. Will those shots be efficient ones? Your guess is as good as mine. But he is a good fit for an uptempo team as a sixth man or, potentially, a fifth starter with the right defensive infrastructure around him. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2Wt: 195

Which version of Mashburn should his new team expect to get? He was arguably the foundational piece of New Mexico’s rebirth under Richard Pitino in his first two seasons. In 2022-23, Mashburn was a first-team All-Mountain West performer, averaging 19.1 points per game and drilling 38.2 percent of his 3s. The season before, he averaged 18.2 points and was third-team All-MWC. But Mashburn took a step back this season, falling behind Donovan Dent and Jaelen House in the pecking order while scoring 14.1 points per game on just 36 percent from the field.

A combo guard, Mashburn can fill it up once he gets going, but has never been consistent beyond the arc as he has been inside it. Mashburn wants to live in the 10-to-15-foot range around the elbows and at least made 35 percent of his 212 open catch-and-shoot 3s over the past two seasons, per Synergy. But his pull-up 3-point numbers haven’t been good enough, nor has he consistently finished well around the rim. Every shot he takes around the basket seems to have a high degree of difficulty.

Mashburn’s aggressiveness in hunting shots has value, and it should translate to the high-major level due to his decisiveness and experience. Will those shots be efficient ones? Your guess is as good as mine. But he is a good fit for an uptempo team as a sixth man or, potentially, a fifth starter with the right defensive infrastructure around him. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

Lampkin took the college hoops world by storm late in the season as a fun, big-bodied post presence for Colorado. After starting his career at TCU, Lampkin moved to Boulder and had the best season of his career, averaging 10.6 points and seven rebounds per game while shooting 58 percent from the field. Almost all of Lampkin’s touches come around the rim, particularly on the block. He’s an absolute load down there who throws his weight around, especially against skinnier bigs. In the Buffaloes’ last 13 games, when they went 10-3, Lampkin improved his numbers to 12 points, seven rebounds and 2.4 assists per game on 63.2 percent shooting from the field. He’s sneakily a sharp passer who can find cutters when teams double-team him.

There are downsides that other schools must consider. Lampkin couldn’t have been in a better offensive position this year, as Colorado constantly surrounded him with four shooters. Additionally, Lampkin is a poor defender who does not provide any rim protection. He’ll take up space, but Colorado’s opponents were able to parade to the hoop this season. Unsurprisingly given his body type, he’s also a liability in space, as Marquette showed in Colorado’s Round of 32 NCAA Tournament defeat. Finally, though he’s a strong passer, he can be turnover-prone when crowded.

But teams who deploy post-centric offenses and feature rosters loaded with shooting can make Lampkin an impactful offensive starting center. He has soft touch and plays with an attitude that is infectious to his teammates. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 265

Lampkin took the college hoops world by storm late in the season as a fun, big-bodied post presence for Colorado. After starting his career at TCU, Lampkin moved to Boulder and had the best season of his career, averaging 10.6 points and seven rebounds per game while shooting 58 percent from the field. Almost all of Lampkin’s touches come around the rim, particularly on the block. He’s an absolute load down there who throws his weight around, especially against skinnier bigs. In the Buffaloes’ last 13 games, when they went 10-3, Lampkin improved his numbers to 12 points, seven rebounds and 2.4 assists per game on 63.2 percent shooting from the field. He’s sneakily a sharp passer who can find cutters when teams double-team him.

There are downsides that other schools must consider. Lampkin couldn’t have been in a better offensive position this year, as Colorado constantly surrounded him with four shooters. Additionally, Lampkin is a poor defender who does not provide any rim protection. He’ll take up space, but Colorado’s opponents were able to parade to the hoop this season. Unsurprisingly given his body type, he’s also a liability in space, as Marquette showed in Colorado’s Round of 32 NCAA Tournament defeat. Finally, though he’s a strong passer, he can be turnover-prone when crowded.

But teams who deploy post-centric offenses and feature rosters loaded with shooting can make Lampkin an impactful offensive starting center. He has soft touch and plays with an attitude that is infectious to his teammates. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

I haven’t been one of Lampkin's biggest fans for many of the reasons we saw in Colorado’s Round of 32 loss to Marquette, when the Golden Eagles repeatedly attacked him in ball screens. Lampkin's not a good rim protector in drop coverage and he’s not mobile enough to switch.

One way to mitigate his defensive issues is to deploy him in a zone, where he could take up space inside and use his size and length at the basket. The Orange used much less zone in Red Autry's first season than they did under Jim Boeheim — just 20 percent of their defensive possessions, per Synergy. Syracuse was quite poor on defense last season, finishing 13th in the ACC in defensive rating while giving up 111 points per 100 possessions, per KenPom. So perhaps Lampkin's recruitment signals a desire to go back to more zone next season.

If the Orange plan to use a similar amount of man-to-man again next season, I do not think Lampkin will be a particularly successful addition. But Lampkin is undeniably skilled on offense and will give the team a real post presence, something it lacked this season following the departure of Jesse Edwards. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Anyone looking for a versatile big who can play both the 4 and the 5 should be intrigued by Brown-Jones, a first-team All-Southern Conference choice who originally started his career at VCU before moving down a level to Greensboro and thriving. He averaged 18.9 points and 7.5 rebounds per game last season on a good 21-win team in the league.

Brown-Joens is a versatile big man offensively who served in a lot of roles for Greensboro. The Spartans posted him with reasonable success because he was a foul-drawing machine at the SoCon level. He has excellent hands that were always available for dump-off passes in the dunker spot, and he occasionally spotted up and fired from 3. He can act as a screener or dribble-hand-off player in ball screens, then roll all the way to the rim or pop for 3. He’s not the best passer or playmaker, but he rarely makes mistakes.

Defensively, Brown-Jones is a bit small to control the paint at the high-major level, but was useful rotating across from the opposite side to make his presence felt. He got a bit stationary on defense at times last season, but was more active at VCU, which makes me think he’ll be a better defender as his offensive role scales down.

There’s no doubt Brown-Jones is a high-major player, but his exact role depends on the team that gets him. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Anyone looking for a versatile big who can play both the 4 and the 5 should be intrigued by Brown-Jones, a first-team All-Southern Conference choice who originally started his career at VCU before moving down a level to Greensboro and thriving. He averaged 18.9 points and 7.5 rebounds per game last season on a good 21-win team in the league.

Brown-Joens is a versatile big man offensively who served in a lot of roles for Greensboro. The Spartans posted him with reasonable success because he was a foul-drawing machine at the SoCon level. He has excellent hands that were always available for dump-off passes in the dunker spot, and he occasionally spotted up and fired from 3. He can act as a screener or dribble-hand-off player in ball screens, then roll all the way to the rim or pop for 3. He’s not the best passer or playmaker, but he rarely makes mistakes.

Defensively, Brown-Jones is a bit small to control the paint at the high-major level, but was useful rotating across from the opposite side to make his presence felt. He got a bit stationary on defense at times last season, but was more active at VCU, which makes me think he’ll be a better defender as his offensive role scales down.

There’s no doubt Brown-Jones is a high-major player, but his exact role depends on the team that gets him. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 255

Dainja started the final 21 games of his sophom*ore season, but saw his playing time decrease this season after Illinois leaned into a more open style, playing stretch big Coleman Hawkins at center and bringing Dainja off the bench.

When Dainja was on the floor and engaged, he was one of the most productive per-minute big men in the Big Ten. His averages don’t pop off the page — 6.1 points per game this season, 9.5 last campaign — but that’s mostly a result of playing time. He’s talented enough to be a go-to guy in the right system, with extremely soft touch and hands. He’s efficient, shooting 66.9 percent from the field this season. He’s also an elite offensive rebounder who would have ranked 11th in offensive rebounding rate nationally if he’d played enough minutes to qualify. While the Illini didn’t throw Dainja the ball a ton in the post, he’s capable as a back-to-the-basket scorer.

Dainja had his best game of the year in the opening round of the NCAA Tournament, scoring 21 points on a perfect 9-of-9 shooting to go along with eight rebounds and two blocks against Morehead State. He gave more effort on defense late in the season, and the Illini were stingier with him on the floor.

Dainja started his career at Baylor, redshirting on the 2021 national title team and then transferring as a sophom*ore mid-year after playing in only three games. His biggest weakness is at the free throw line: He gets there often, but is only a career 50.9 percent shooter. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 255

Dainja started the final 21 games of his sophom*ore season, but saw his playing time decrease this season after Illinois leaned into a more open style, playing stretch big Coleman Hawkins at center and bringing Dainja off the bench.

When Dainja was on the floor and engaged, he was one of the most productive per-minute big men in the Big Ten. His averages don’t pop off the page — 6.1 points per game this season, 9.5 last campaign — but that’s mostly a result of playing time. He’s talented enough to be a go-to guy in the right system, with extremely soft touch and hands. He’s efficient, shooting 66.9 percent from the field this season. He’s also an elite offensive rebounder who would have ranked 11th in offensive rebounding rate nationally if he’d played enough minutes to qualify. While the Illini didn’t throw Dainja the ball a ton in the post, he’s capable as a back-to-the-basket scorer.

Dainja had his best game of the year in the opening round of the NCAA Tournament, scoring 21 points on a perfect 9-of-9 shooting to go along with eight rebounds and two blocks against Morehead State. He gave more effort on defense late in the season, and the Illini were stingier with him on the floor.

Dainja started his career at Baylor, redshirting on the 2021 national title team and then transferring as a sophom*ore mid-year after playing in only three games. His biggest weakness is at the free throw line: He gets there often, but is only a career 50.9 percent shooter. — C.J. Moore

How he fits

Memphis continues a strong couple of days in the portal, winning over Dainja after getting Tulsa scorer PJ Haggerty locked in the day before. The 6-foot-9 Dainja will give Penny Hardaway and company the kind of big-bodied post scorer the Tigers have lacked since Jalen Duren left in 2022.

As a former top-100 recruit, Dainja has always left coaches and scouts believing there was more to his game than he's shown so far. Maybe Memphis will be the place to tease that potential out. The Tigers' only frontcourt player right now is Nick Jourdain, whose ability to step out and shoot should blend nicely with Dainja’s interior scoring. The Tigers also tend to bet big on offensive rebounding under Hardaway, and Dainja’s long arms should create plenty of second chances, even if having him crash the offensive glass could lead to more odd-man transition breaks for opponents.

Defense will be key; Dainja needs to keep his energy high on that end for a Memphis team that finished outside of the top-100 in points allowed per 100 possessions. But the best way for Hardaway to improve that mark is to continue to recruit high-effort perimeter defenders that fight around screens well in order to account for Dainja in drop coverage.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2Wt: 180

Isaacs is an adventure. It’s fun when he’s running hot. but he can also shoot his team out of a game. The one guarantee is he’s going to shoot. A lot. He averaged 15.8 points on 14.1 shots this season. He is wired to score and attack. He’s not that fast but seems to figure out a way to get past defenders. He’s good at changing speeds and knowing when he can gain leverage. He can make some tough passes and sees the floor well, but he prefers to shoot over passing. That’s why it’s tough to play him on the ball. He takes a lot of contested jumpers and shot just 29.3 percent from 3 this season after shooting 37.8 percent as a freshman. He struggles to finish at the rim, shooting 48.3 percent this season, per Synergy. Defensively, Isaacs is someone teams are going to hunt. He’s competitive and will battle, but he has his limitations. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-2Wt: 180

Isaacs is an adventure. It’s fun when he’s running hot. but he can also shoot his team out of a game. The one guarantee is he’s going to shoot. A lot. He averaged 15.8 points on 14.1 shots this season. He is wired to score and attack. He’s not that fast but seems to figure out a way to get past defenders. He’s good at changing speeds and knowing when he can gain leverage. He can make some tough passes and sees the floor well, but he prefers to shoot over passing. That’s why it’s tough to play him on the ball. He takes a lot of contested jumpers and shot just 29.3 percent from 3 this season after shooting 37.8 percent as a freshman. He struggles to finish at the rim, shooting 48.3 percent this season, per Synergy. Defensively, Isaacs is someone teams are going to hunt. He’s competitive and will battle, but he has his limitations. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 193

Griffiths was one of my favorite freshmen in this class, and he can absolutely shoot from distance despite what the numbers say this year. There just wasn’t anyone to get him the ball for most of this year. It’s not an accident that he started to play better when Jeremiah Williams regained his eligibility, and the last seven games of the year were solid: He hit 37 percent of his 3s down the stretch and looked strong in the Big Ten tournament loss to Maryland.

Having said that, there were also very significant growing pains. Griffiths struggled a lot on the defensive end, which seemed to hold him out of lineups. On top of that, it felt like he started to press for about a two-month period in December and January, never quite getting into rhythm. All told, the season was a disappointment, but I’m willing to bet on Griffiths, and I’d bet a number of other high-major schools would, too.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 193

Griffiths was one of my favorite freshmen in this class, and he can absolutely shoot from distance despite what the numbers say this year. There just wasn’t anyone to get him the ball for most of this year. It’s not an accident that he started to play better when Jeremiah Williams regained his eligibility, and the last seven games of the year were solid: He hit 37 percent of his 3s down the stretch and looked strong in the Big Ten tournament loss to Maryland.

Having said that, there were also very significant growing pains. Griffiths struggled a lot on the defensive end, which seemed to hold him out of lineups. On top of that, it felt like he started to press for about a two-month period in December and January, never quite getting into rhythm. All told, the season was a disappointment, but I’m willing to bet on Griffiths, and I’d bet a number of other high-major schools would, too.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 203

Booth, a four-star recruit coming out of high school and the son of 10-year NBA veteran and current Denver Nuggets general manager Calvin Booth, averaged 6.4 points and 4.3 rebounds per game last season while making 19 starts.

The younger Booth preferred to hang around the perimeter at Notre Dame, taking more 3s (118) than 2s (74). The problem was he wasn’t very efficient, making only 29.7 percent of his triples. Run him off the line, and he was even worse, struggling to make pull-up jumpers. I don’t love his shot mechanics; he brings the ball close to his face as he starts his shooting motion and has a low release, which negates the perks of being a big man who can shoot.

But there is reason to be optimistic about the player he could become. While he played as a stretch four for the Fighting Irish, his best college position is probably as a center in a five-out offense, especially if he’s ever able to consistently make his jumper. He’ll need to get stronger to play that spot, but he has a good frame for a young player and was a solid team defender who was usually in the right spot.

He’s still 18 and doesn’t turn 19 until July. — C.J. Moore

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 203

Booth, a four-star recruit coming out of high school and the son of 10-year NBA veteran and current Denver Nuggets general manager Calvin Booth, averaged 6.4 points and 4.3 rebounds per game last season while making 19 starts.

The younger Booth preferred to hang around the perimeter at Notre Dame, taking more 3s (118) than 2s (74). The problem was he wasn’t very efficient, making only 29.7 percent of his triples. Run him off the line, and he was even worse, struggling to make pull-up jumpers. I don’t love his shot mechanics; he brings the ball close to his face as he starts his shooting motion and has a low release, which negates the perks of being a big man who can shoot.

But there is reason to be optimistic about the player he could become. While he played as a stretch four for the Fighting Irish, his best college position is probably as a center in a five-out offense, especially if he’s ever able to consistently make his jumper. He’ll need to get stronger to play that spot, but he has a good frame for a young player and was a solid team defender who was usually in the right spot.

He’s still 18 and doesn’t turn 19 until July. — C.J. Moore

Stats

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 200

Not many players can realistically call themselves the best athlete in the portal, but Copeland is one of them. He’s lightning in a bottle on a basketball court, averaging 9.6 points, 4.6 rebounds, 2.8 assists and 1.5 steals in just 22 minutes per game last season while playing some point guard and some off the ball for the Orange. He does things on the court that few can, from long hang-time finger rolls to spinning, whirling layups. His jump stops seem to cover eight feet, which is absurd.

Copeland pairs those athletic gifts with tremendous passing ability. He reads ball screens well and throws some of the most impressive live-dribble passes you’ll ever see on a court. I’m taking 20-foot wrap-arounds into tight windows, hook passes to rollers with ease, touch lobs, sharp dump-offs and more.

There is a wildness to his game that can be both intoxicating and frustrating for his team. He’ll turn the ball trying to do the spectacular. On top of that, he can’t really shoot. He made just 25 percent of his 3s and did not look particularly comfortable taking them in any circ*mstance.

But sometimes, the lightbulb comes on in a hurry with guys this athletic and with such a natural feel for the game. If it does, he might be truly special. Maybe he merely ends up as an impact backup like he was at Syracuse. But if he hits, he’s really going to hit. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 200

Not many players can realistically call themselves the best athlete in the portal, but Copeland is one of them. He’s lightning in a bottle on a basketball court, averaging 9.6 points, 4.6 rebounds, 2.8 assists and 1.5 steals in just 22 minutes per game last season while playing some point guard and some off the ball for the Orange. He does things on the court that few can, from long hang-time finger rolls to spinning, whirling layups. His jump stops seem to cover eight feet, which is absurd.

Copeland pairs those athletic gifts with tremendous passing ability. He reads ball screens well and throws some of the most impressive live-dribble passes you’ll ever see on a court. I’m taking 20-foot wrap-arounds into tight windows, hook passes to rollers with ease, touch lobs, sharp dump-offs and more.

There is a wildness to his game that can be both intoxicating and frustrating for his team. He’ll turn the ball trying to do the spectacular. On top of that, he can’t really shoot. He made just 25 percent of his 3s and did not look particularly comfortable taking them in any circ*mstance.

But sometimes, the lightbulb comes on in a hurry with guys this athletic and with such a natural feel for the game. If it does, he might be truly special. Maybe he merely ends up as an impact backup like he was at Syracuse. But if he hits, he’s really going to hit. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 195

The former Virginia Tech player has had a strange start to his collegiate career. A former top-100 recruit who played at legendary Maryland powerhouse program DeMatha Catholic, Rice was hailed as a coup for Mike Young and co., who also brought in his former DeMatha coach Mike Jones to their staff. Rice dealt with an ankle injury early in his freshman season that kept him out until January, then broke his hand after playing one game against Syracuse and missed another five weeks. Then, after Jones decided to leave Virginia Tech to become an assistant at Maryland, Rice chose not to play this season and left the Virginia Tech program.

Rice has real upside. A combo guard who had offers from all over the place as a recruit, Rice is a crafty ballhandler, using sudden change-of-direction moves that include crossovers and spins. He’s not wildly explosive, but he uses his sharp handle to get to his spots. He’s more of a scorer than a passer and has no problem firing confident jumpers from distance when he gets even a bit of daylight.

His odd circ*mstances mean, in all likelihood, he will have four seasons of eligibility left. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 195

The former Virginia Tech player has had a strange start to his collegiate career. A former top-100 recruit who played at legendary Maryland powerhouse program DeMatha Catholic, Rice was hailed as a coup for Mike Young and co., who also brought in his former DeMatha coach Mike Jones to their staff. Rice dealt with an ankle injury early in his freshman season that kept him out until January, then broke his hand after playing one game against Syracuse and missed another five weeks. Then, after Jones decided to leave Virginia Tech to become an assistant at Maryland, Rice chose not to play this season and left the Virginia Tech program.

Rice has real upside. A combo guard who had offers from all over the place as a recruit, Rice is a crafty ballhandler, using sudden change-of-direction moves that include crossovers and spins. He’s not wildly explosive, but he uses his sharp handle to get to his spots. He’s more of a scorer than a passer and has no problem firing confident jumpers from distance when he gets even a bit of daylight.

His odd circ*mstances mean, in all likelihood, he will have four seasons of eligibility left. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Rice will be heading to Kevin Willard’s Terps next season, even though Jones departed to become the head coach at Old Dominion. Willard succeeded for a long time at Seton Hall with combo scoring guards, whether they were purer shooters like Myles Powell, pull-up threats like Khadeen Carrington or attack-oriented drivers like Isaiah Whitehead. With last season’s starting point guard Jahmir Young departing and the rest of the backcourt cupboard bare outside of DeShawn Harris-Smith and role player Jahari Long, Rice projects as a starter next season and should help boost a Terps unit in desperate need of offensive firepower and shooting.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 220

Humrichous is a big shooter with athleticism, firing away from NBA range and spacing the floor. He’s a threat from anywhere inside 28 feet. He’ll come around screens and dribble-handoffs and fire if you go under. He’ll trail in transition and stop and pop off the catch. Or, he’ll just spot up and fire. Humrichous averaged 14.7 points, 4.7 rebounds and 1.9 assists while shooting 48.4 percent from the field and 41.4 percent from 3 in his first D-I season after playing three years at NAIA Huntington University.

Unlike fellow Missouri Valley shooter Cade Tyson, Humrichous hasn’t shown much off the bounce, but he can drive the ball and use his size to shield defenders from the shot, as well as attacking closeouts when necessary. He missed eight games with a foot injury this year, and Evansville went 1-7 in those games, including matchups with Cincinnati, Indiana State, Bradley and Drake that would have been nice evaluation opportunities. And by and large, it did feel like he struggled to get shots against the good teams Evansville played.

That’s the big question as he presumably looks toward the high-major level: Without having faced a ton of high-end competition, what exactly does his game look like against elite athletes? That question ended up sliding him down the board a bit for me. But if we look up and Humrichous is averaging 14 points while shooting 40 percent from 3 on an NCAA Tournament team next year, I won’t be surprised by that, either. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-9 Wt: 220

Humrichous is a big shooter with athleticism, firing away from NBA range and spacing the floor. He’s a threat from anywhere inside 28 feet. He’ll come around screens and dribble-handoffs and fire if you go under. He’ll trail in transition and stop and pop off the catch. Or, he’ll just spot up and fire. Humrichous averaged 14.7 points, 4.7 rebounds and 1.9 assists while shooting 48.4 percent from the field and 41.4 percent from 3 in his first D-I season after playing three years at NAIA Huntington University.

Unlike fellow Missouri Valley shooter Cade Tyson, Humrichous hasn’t shown much off the bounce, but he can drive the ball and use his size to shield defenders from the shot, as well as attacking closeouts when necessary. He missed eight games with a foot injury this year, and Evansville went 1-7 in those games, including matchups with Cincinnati, Indiana State, Bradley and Drake that would have been nice evaluation opportunities. And by and large, it did feel like he struggled to get shots against the good teams Evansville played.

That’s the big question as he presumably looks toward the high-major level: Without having faced a ton of high-end competition, what exactly does his game look like against elite athletes? That question ended up sliding him down the board a bit for me. But if we look up and Humrichous is averaging 14 points while shooting 40 percent from 3 on an NCAA Tournament team next year, I won’t be surprised by that, either. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 200

A starting guard on Furman’s team that beat Virginia in the NCAA Tournament in 2023, Foster took another leap this year. Basically every look for Foster within Bob Richey’s offense was either a shot at the rim or a catch-and-shoot 3. When Foster got a chance to attack in transition, he’d get downhill and finish through contact extremely well. He’s not a monster athlete in terms of explosiveness, but he carves out space well with his pivot foot, uses his shoulders to brush off defenders on drives and does a fantastic job of playing through the whistle. Foster only had one dunk all year, per Synergy, despite taking a significant number of his shots at the rim.

His numbers from distance weren’t great this year, as he only made 29.7 percent of his 3s, But he was extremely confident taking them, with about seven attempts per game. In the previous two years as a starter alongside 2023 NBA draft pick Jalen Slawson, Foster was much more effective from deep. He’ll need to get his shot off quicker, and it feels like he’s often not ready to catch and fire immediately. But he’s also a monster rebounder for a guard, averaging 7.5 per game this season. He plays hard, has a high-major frame, and should be ready to go.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 200

A starting guard on Furman’s team that beat Virginia in the NCAA Tournament in 2023, Foster took another leap this year. Basically every look for Foster within Bob Richey’s offense was either a shot at the rim or a catch-and-shoot 3. When Foster got a chance to attack in transition, he’d get downhill and finish through contact extremely well. He’s not a monster athlete in terms of explosiveness, but he carves out space well with his pivot foot, uses his shoulders to brush off defenders on drives and does a fantastic job of playing through the whistle. Foster only had one dunk all year, per Synergy, despite taking a significant number of his shots at the rim.

His numbers from distance weren’t great this year, as he only made 29.7 percent of his 3s, But he was extremely confident taking them, with about seven attempts per game. In the previous two years as a starter alongside 2023 NBA draft pick Jalen Slawson, Foster was much more effective from deep. He’ll need to get his shot off quicker, and it feels like he’s often not ready to catch and fire immediately. But he’s also a monster rebounder for a guard, averaging 7.5 per game this season. He plays hard, has a high-major frame, and should be ready to go.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

With Quincy Olivari departing, the Musketeers need someone else who can knock down shots. Foster isn’t the shooter Olivari is, but very few are. He should enter the fold as a top-six player in the team’s rotation that plays physically and provides offensive firepower. I can’t imagine this is Sean Miller’s only move in the portal this year, even with Dayvion McKnight returning. But the team does have a solid upperclassman backcourt to build around now in McKnight, Foster and rising junior Desmond Claude. Throw in upside wing Dailyn Swain, and there is a lot to work with here. They should be in a solid position to get back to the NCAA Tournament next season with a few solid frontcourt additions.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 185

A four-time All-Horizon League honoree, Warrick has big-game experience and a lot of talent on the ball. His goal every time he touches it is to push the ball down the court and pressure the defense immediately, driving transition play with his aggression. But then in the halfcourt, Warrick can play both on and off the ball as a primary scorer. He loves to get to his Eurostep if he’s on the right side or put his shoulder into his man on the left side and finish with his preferred hand.

Warrick’s 29.8 percent mark from 3 this year doesn’t look great, but he made 36.6 percent of his nearly 600 3s in the prior three seasons and has really deep range. The problem this year was that he had to take nearly half of his 3s off the dribble, per Synergy, which is a tough way to live when you’re not overly shifty or explosive. But given that he can attack in a straight line, finish at the rim and knock down shots off the catch, I like Warrick’s chances of transitioning well to the high-major level. He’s Northern Kentucky’s all-time leading scorer, and he got there on four good teams. He’s tough and physical, with touch and a nose for the bucket.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 185

A four-time All-Horizon League honoree, Warrick has big-game experience and a lot of talent on the ball. His goal every time he touches it is to push the ball down the court and pressure the defense immediately, driving transition play with his aggression. But then in the halfcourt, Warrick can play both on and off the ball as a primary scorer. He loves to get to his Eurostep if he’s on the right side or put his shoulder into his man on the left side and finish with his preferred hand.

Warrick’s 29.8 percent mark from 3 this year doesn’t look great, but he made 36.6 percent of his nearly 600 3s in the prior three seasons and has really deep range. The problem this year was that he had to take nearly half of his 3s off the dribble, per Synergy, which is a tough way to live when you’re not overly shifty or explosive. But given that he can attack in a straight line, finish at the rim and knock down shots off the catch, I like Warrick’s chances of transitioning well to the high-major level. He’s Northern Kentucky’s all-time leading scorer, and he got there on four good teams. He’s tough and physical, with touch and a nose for the bucket.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 205

A three-year starter at Toledo, Moss has experienced plenty of regular-season success and an equal amount of conference tournament disappointment in his career.

In that time, Moss effectively made the leap from backcourt role player to primary option. More than half of Moss’ shot attempts this year came at the rim, and he finished at an above-average clip for a guard while drawing five free throw attempts per game. He’ll push in transition, use ball screens, or reject them to surge to the hoop. Toledo’s well-timed, sharply executed offense under Tod Kowalczyk helps Moss find driving lanes. Moss did at times overpenetrate and get into trouble underneath the rim, but he was an unselfish passer as well.

Moss’ main issue is he’s an inconsistent shooter. It takes him a long time to load into his shot, so don’t expect him to fire much off the bounce as he moves up to a higher level. There is some scope for him to improve off the catch; his jumper isn’t completely broken and he actually made 35 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s this year, per Synergy.

Moss should expect to make an immediate impact for a high-major on defense. He’s aggressive at the point-of-attack, cutting off lanes using his quickness and 205-pound frame. He made the MAC All-Defensive team, and though he wasn’t the team’s primary defender against top options, he used his physicality to average 1.7 steals per game.

I believe Moss can make an impact at a high major next season, so long as his new team does not surround him with too many non-shooters. Any team in need of rim pressure and perimeter defense should take a look.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 205

A three-year starter at Toledo, Moss has experienced plenty of regular-season success and an equal amount of conference tournament disappointment in his career.

In that time, Moss effectively made the leap from backcourt role player to primary option. More than half of Moss’ shot attempts this year came at the rim, and he finished at an above-average clip for a guard while drawing five free throw attempts per game. He’ll push in transition, use ball screens, or reject them to surge to the hoop. Toledo’s well-timed, sharply executed offense under Tod Kowalczyk helps Moss find driving lanes. Moss did at times overpenetrate and get into trouble underneath the rim, but he was an unselfish passer as well.

Moss’ main issue is he’s an inconsistent shooter. It takes him a long time to load into his shot, so don’t expect him to fire much off the bounce as he moves up to a higher level. There is some scope for him to improve off the catch; his jumper isn’t completely broken and he actually made 35 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s this year, per Synergy.

Moss should expect to make an immediate impact for a high-major on defense. He’s aggressive at the point-of-attack, cutting off lanes using his quickness and 205-pound frame. He made the MAC All-Defensive team, and though he wasn’t the team’s primary defender against top options, he used his physicality to average 1.7 steals per game.

I believe Moss can make an impact at a high major next season, so long as his new team does not surround him with too many non-shooters. Any team in need of rim pressure and perimeter defense should take a look.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 200

Anyone in need of a scoring guard that’s been through the rigors of the SEC? What’s that? Everyone could use that? That’s good news for Lawrence, who averaged 13.8 points this season in his second year as a full-time starter at Vanderbilt.

The lefty guard loves to drive to the rim, where his strong 200-pound frame allows him to score through contact. His mechanics loading into his shot are slow, but he did at least attempt about four 3s per game. He has good length and the frame to impact games on defense, but was less consistent than you’d expect on that end. Sometimes he really brings it. Other times, his energy was a bit lacking.

He’s an ideal third guard for a high-major NCAA Tournament team. He’s older, has more of a track record and possessed a flair for the dramatic at Vandy with a couple of game-winners.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 200

Anyone in need of a scoring guard that’s been through the rigors of the SEC? What’s that? Everyone could use that? That’s good news for Lawrence, who averaged 13.8 points this season in his second year as a full-time starter at Vanderbilt.

The lefty guard loves to drive to the rim, where his strong 200-pound frame allows him to score through contact. His mechanics loading into his shot are slow, but he did at least attempt about four 3s per game. He has good length and the frame to impact games on defense, but was less consistent than you’d expect on that end. Sometimes he really brings it. Other times, his energy was a bit lacking.

He’s an ideal third guard for a high-major NCAA Tournament team. He’s older, has more of a track record and possessed a flair for the dramatic at Vandy with a couple of game-winners.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5Wt: 150

Overton started every game this season for a Drake team that won 28 games and pushed Washington State in the first round of the NCAA Tournament before ultimately falling. The first-year player averaged 11.3 points and 3.3 rebounds per game and was the second-leading freshman scorer in the Missouri Valley. His job was pretty simple: Spot up around Tucker DeVries and Atin Wright in halfcourt situations and attack in transition when given the opportunity. He can finish with both hands around the rim and looked the part athletically against some tough teams.

His release is a bit funky out in front of his face, but his shot preparation is excellent. He had some intriguing relocation moments against heavy closeouts, but for the most part, his new team will want him to either catch and shoot, or catch and attack the rim.

With Drake coach Darian DeVries heading to West Virginia, it’s no surprise Overton is leaving. The question now is whether Overton follows his coach to Morgantown.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5Wt: 150

Overton started every game this season for a Drake team that won 28 games and pushed Washington State in the first round of the NCAA Tournament before ultimately falling. The first-year player averaged 11.3 points and 3.3 rebounds per game and was the second-leading freshman scorer in the Missouri Valley. His job was pretty simple: Spot up around Tucker DeVries and Atin Wright in halfcourt situations and attack in transition when given the opportunity. He can finish with both hands around the rim and looked the part athletically against some tough teams.

His release is a bit funky out in front of his face, but his shot preparation is excellent. He had some intriguing relocation moments against heavy closeouts, but for the most part, his new team will want him to either catch and shoot, or catch and attack the rim.

With Drake coach Darian DeVries heading to West Virginia, it’s no surprise Overton is leaving. The question now is whether Overton follows his coach to Morgantown.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 210

From the time Andy Enfield departed USC for the SMU head coaching job, the basketball world was waiting to see if James would at least hit the portal to assess his options. As LeBron James said recently, his son didn't have any easy options. Ultimately, Bronny will declare for the NBA Draft and enter the transfer portal at the same time.

If Bronny James stays in college and transfers to a high-major school, I expect him to be more of a role player than a star next season. He's not the first round, one-and-done prospect that some expected before his cardiac arrest last summer. But he could at least be a valuable college player as soon as next season.

James projects as a 3-and-D guard who plays hard, makes good decisions on offense, does the little things, passes well, leads the fast break off defensive rebounds, fills transition lanes and attacks the rim when he gets a chance. He is a terrific defensive player who really fights at the point-of-attack and has the length and foot speed to stick with most guards. He has good hands and is strong enough to stop defenders' drives in their tracks. Plus, he's a sharp team defender with great feel for the game.

James' offense is a work in progress. He's not a particularly high-level ballhandler, and needs time to develop into one considering his 6-foot-3 size. He struggled to generate any halfcourt paint touches this year, and isn't much of a pull-up shooter yet. He made only 27 percent of his 3s last season, though he looked more confident taking them at USC and has more shooting talent than his percentage shows.

Still, there is a lot to be excited about Bronny's game, even if he averaged less than five points and 20 minutes per game for a sub .500 team last season. He has real skills that can impact winning, and sources throughout basketball praise his demeanor in the face of immense fame. Remember: due to the cardiac arrest he suffered last July, he didn't get a chance to spend much time on the court coming into last season.

It will take time if his goal is to be an NBA-level player. But if James stays in school, gets a clear offseason to hone in on his game and find the right context with dynamic shot creators next to him, he could make a big leap next season.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 210

From the time Andy Enfield departed USC for the SMU head coaching job, the basketball world was waiting to see if James would at least hit the portal to assess his options. As LeBron James said recently, his son didn't have any easy options. Ultimately, Bronny will declare for the NBA Draft and enter the transfer portal at the same time.

If Bronny James stays in college and transfers to a high-major school, I expect him to be more of a role player than a star next season. He's not the first round, one-and-done prospect that some expected before his cardiac arrest last summer. But he could at least be a valuable college player as soon as next season.

James projects as a 3-and-D guard who plays hard, makes good decisions on offense, does the little things, passes well, leads the fast break off defensive rebounds, fills transition lanes and attacks the rim when he gets a chance. He is a terrific defensive player who really fights at the point-of-attack and has the length and foot speed to stick with most guards. He has good hands and is strong enough to stop defenders' drives in their tracks. Plus, he's a sharp team defender with great feel for the game.

James' offense is a work in progress. He's not a particularly high-level ballhandler, and needs time to develop into one considering his 6-foot-3 size. He struggled to generate any halfcourt paint touches this year, and isn't much of a pull-up shooter yet. He made only 27 percent of his 3s last season, though he looked more confident taking them at USC and has more shooting talent than his percentage shows.

Still, there is a lot to be excited about Bronny's game, even if he averaged less than five points and 20 minutes per game for a sub .500 team last season. He has real skills that can impact winning, and sources throughout basketball praise his demeanor in the face of immense fame. Remember: due to the cardiac arrest he suffered last July, he didn't get a chance to spend much time on the court coming into last season.

It will take time if his goal is to be an NBA-level player. But if James stays in school, gets a clear offseason to hone in on his game and find the right context with dynamic shot creators next to him, he could make a big leap next season.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 175

The Pac-12 Sixth Man of the Year took a big leap this season, nearly doubling his scoring output to 11.1 points per game simply by becoming more efficient.

An undersized scoring guard, Johnson is going to get the ball and go. If he sees an opening off the catch or a screen, he’ll attack the rack. If his defender goes behind a dribble hand-off, he’ll stop and fire without a second thought. If he catches the ball and has a window to shoot, the ball is going up. He occasionally shows patience as a driver and can throw sharp passes; he had a fun chemistry with rim-running big Braxton Meah against bench units when Meah wasn’t starting. But he’s a scorer, through and through.

With Mike Hopkins fired, Johnson will look for a new home where he can continue to do his thing.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 175

The Pac-12 Sixth Man of the Year took a big leap this season, nearly doubling his scoring output to 11.1 points per game simply by becoming more efficient.

An undersized scoring guard, Johnson is going to get the ball and go. If he sees an opening off the catch or a screen, he’ll attack the rack. If his defender goes behind a dribble hand-off, he’ll stop and fire without a second thought. If he catches the ball and has a window to shoot, the ball is going up. He occasionally shows patience as a driver and can throw sharp passes; he had a fun chemistry with rim-running big Braxton Meah against bench units when Meah wasn’t starting. But he’s a scorer, through and through.

With Mike Hopkins fired, Johnson will look for a new home where he can continue to do his thing.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 180

I thought Essegian was primed to be one of the Big 10’s breakout players last season. He was an All-Freshman selection in 2022-23 after averaging 11.7 points and hitting 36 percent of his nearly 200 3-point attempts, and was even better in conference play.

But something was clearly amiss in Madison this season. Essegian tried playing through an early back injury, and his performances weren’t nearly of the caliber we saw last season. Already a rough defensive player under the best of circ*mstances, Essegian’s back injury made him even slower on that end. Ultimately, he lost his rotation spot on the team, with coach Greg Gard saying the team didn’t have time to let Essegian work through his defensive miscues or get back into game shape.

Essegian would certainly benefit from a change in scenery. The Fort Wayne native remains an immensely gifted offensive player and would fit in well at a school like Connecticut or Purdue, who both run off-ball actions for shooters.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 180

I thought Essegian was primed to be one of the Big 10’s breakout players last season. He was an All-Freshman selection in 2022-23 after averaging 11.7 points and hitting 36 percent of his nearly 200 3-point attempts, and was even better in conference play.

But something was clearly amiss in Madison this season. Essegian tried playing through an early back injury, and his performances weren’t nearly of the caliber we saw last season. Already a rough defensive player under the best of circ*mstances, Essegian’s back injury made him even slower on that end. Ultimately, he lost his rotation spot on the team, with coach Greg Gard saying the team didn’t have time to let Essegian work through his defensive miscues or get back into game shape.

Essegian would certainly benefit from a change in scenery. The Fort Wayne native remains an immensely gifted offensive player and would fit in well at a school like Connecticut or Purdue, who both run off-ball actions for shooters.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 220

Cohen, the NEC Player of the Year at Saint Francis (PA) in 2022-23, made a smart next step up last season. Instead of transferring to the highest level possible, he moved from a low major to a upper-tier mid major in UMass, where his game profiled wonderfully. He averaged 15.9 points and 6.8 rebounds per game while earning first-team All-Atlantic-10 honors.

Cohen has great touch around the rim with both hands. He makes more shots from awkward angles than anyone I can remember, including weird fadeaway hook and flip shots through contact from all over the paint. His footwork is terrific, he seems to catch every pass from his guards and creates extra possessions on the offensive glass. He can occasionally step out and shoot 3s, but is more comfortable passing from up top.

There are some athletic questions as he moves up again to play against bigs with more length. He isn’t explosive, so his game is built entirely on crafty footwork and angles. I don’t think he’d fare well in the super athletic leagues like the SEC or Big 12. But he could duplicate the season Josh Oduro, a multi-time All-Atlantic-10 player, had at Providence this season.

He has the upside to be a starting big man, but there is a bit more downside than there would be with some other options.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 220

Cohen, the NEC Player of the Year at Saint Francis (PA) in 2022-23, made a smart next step up last season. Instead of transferring to the highest level possible, he moved from a low major to a upper-tier mid major in UMass, where his game profiled wonderfully. He averaged 15.9 points and 6.8 rebounds per game while earning first-team All-Atlantic-10 honors.

Cohen has great touch around the rim with both hands. He makes more shots from awkward angles than anyone I can remember, including weird fadeaway hook and flip shots through contact from all over the paint. His footwork is terrific, he seems to catch every pass from his guards and creates extra possessions on the offensive glass. He can occasionally step out and shoot 3s, but is more comfortable passing from up top.

There are some athletic questions as he moves up again to play against bigs with more length. He isn’t explosive, so his game is built entirely on crafty footwork and angles. I don’t think he’d fare well in the super athletic leagues like the SEC or Big 12. But he could duplicate the season Josh Oduro, a multi-time All-Atlantic-10 player, had at Providence this season.

He has the upside to be a starting big man, but there is a bit more downside than there would be with some other options.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Well, this is going to be really interesting. He’s certainly skilled enough to play in the SEC. My big question for Cohen was how his athletic profile would translate to facing bigger, longer athletes in the SEC, which is arguably the most athletic conference in college hoops. I have an immense amount of respect for Cohen taking on that challenge.

The Razorbacks need some offensive punch in the frontcourt, as Baye Fall and Makhi Mitchell are the team’s lone returning bigs, assuming that Trevon Brazile goes to the NBA. Given that there could be some diminishing returns on Cohen’s post game at this level, I think it would behoove him to get even more confident and comfortable shooting from midrange and beyond the 3-point line. He can’t be the team’s last addition, but the worst-case scenario is that he provides strong depth.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 215

Ht: 7-1 Wt: 215

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Jakimovski may not look like a good get statistically, having averaged 9.7 points this past season. But he’s an excellent role player for any high-major team. He’s a three-year starter for Washington State and has gotten better every season. He knocks down 3s off the catch and has to be closed out on. Really, that’s the offensive role for the North Macedonian wing.

He can occasionally attack closeouts, and he’s unselfish with the ball. But by and large, he’s going to fire from distance and make about 35 percent of his 3s. More importantly though, Jakimovski is a strong on-ball defender who was the most consistent perimeter defender on a top-two defense in the Pac-12 this season. He can take on tough matchups, and he’s a really sharp team defender. There’s a reason that he played more minutes than anyone else on this year’s 25-10 Cougars team. He does all of the little things required to help you win. With Washington State coach Kyle Smith departing to go to Stanford, it’ll be interesting to see if Jakimovski follows. Given how well Smith maximized him, it would make sense.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Jakimovski may not look like a good get statistically, having averaged 9.7 points this past season. But he’s an excellent role player for any high-major team. He’s a three-year starter for Washington State and has gotten better every season. He knocks down 3s off the catch and has to be closed out on. Really, that’s the offensive role for the North Macedonian wing.

He can occasionally attack closeouts, and he’s unselfish with the ball. But by and large, he’s going to fire from distance and make about 35 percent of his 3s. More importantly though, Jakimovski is a strong on-ball defender who was the most consistent perimeter defender on a top-two defense in the Pac-12 this season. He can take on tough matchups, and he’s a really sharp team defender. There’s a reason that he played more minutes than anyone else on this year’s 25-10 Cougars team. He does all of the little things required to help you win. With Washington State coach Kyle Smith departing to go to Stanford, it’ll be interesting to see if Jakimovski follows. Given how well Smith maximized him, it would make sense.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Angel was a two-year starter at Stanford and had his best season to date this past year. He averaged 13 points, five rebounds and two assists with remarkable efficiency as a play-finisher. He shot 56.7 percent from the field and 44.7 percent from 3 on nearly three attempts per game. He makes his free throws at an 81.6 percent clip.

Part of why he’s so efficient is that there is zero fluff to his game. He takes shots at the rim or he takes 3s. He’ll take the occasional hook shot from eight feet if he has a mismatch, but nearly 90 percent of his attempts this season were either catch-and-shoot jumpers or at the basket. You can throw him the ball on the block and post him, but by and large he only actually shoots when he has a distinct advantage. He loves the little turnaround hook shot over his left shoulder when he has deep position. But he can also use the threat of his shot to drive and score that way, using some fun finger rolls.

Teams will be interested in him as a floor-spacing forward. Angel hits open 3s because he has great shot prep and is always ready to fire. His touch is terrific. As a fifth-year senior, Angel will be plug-and-play in just about any big rotation and could start for a significant number of teams at the high-major level. Honestly, it would make sense for him to consider a return to Stanford, as Kyle Smith will appreciate his inside-out game as well as his 3s and layups style. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 220

Angel was a two-year starter at Stanford and had his best season to date this past year. He averaged 13 points, five rebounds and two assists with remarkable efficiency as a play-finisher. He shot 56.7 percent from the field and 44.7 percent from 3 on nearly three attempts per game. He makes his free throws at an 81.6 percent clip.

Part of why he’s so efficient is that there is zero fluff to his game. He takes shots at the rim or he takes 3s. He’ll take the occasional hook shot from eight feet if he has a mismatch, but nearly 90 percent of his attempts this season were either catch-and-shoot jumpers or at the basket. You can throw him the ball on the block and post him, but by and large he only actually shoots when he has a distinct advantage. He loves the little turnaround hook shot over his left shoulder when he has deep position. But he can also use the threat of his shot to drive and score that way, using some fun finger rolls.

Teams will be interested in him as a floor-spacing forward. Angel hits open 3s because he has great shot prep and is always ready to fire. His touch is terrific. As a fifth-year senior, Angel will be plug-and-play in just about any big rotation and could start for a significant number of teams at the high-major level. Honestly, it would make sense for him to consider a return to Stanford, as Kyle Smith will appreciate his inside-out game as well as his 3s and layups style. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2Wt: 196

Joseph was a backcourt starter on what might be the most disappointing team in Miami basketball history. The Hurricanes entered the year with high expectations, but ultimately floundered and ended up losing their final 10 games of the season.

For his part, Joseph is a bigger-bodied 6-foot-1 guard who uses his frame well and penetrates the paint with a slower, more deliberate style. I like him best as a passer, where he can hit his rollers and kickout passes at a solid level.

More than that, he does two things well. First, he knocks down shots off the catch, using his smooth lefty stroke to knock down 37.9 percent of his 3s over his career. Second, Joseph is a tough defender; while Miami’s defense as a whole was pretty bad, I thought Joseph generally brought it on the ball.

Teams shouldn’t want Joseph to be their primary initiator, but his defense, passing and shooting should scale up well for teams who already have a primary playmaker. I like him as a third guard next year for a good team.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2Wt: 196

Joseph was a backcourt starter on what might be the most disappointing team in Miami basketball history. The Hurricanes entered the year with high expectations, but ultimately floundered and ended up losing their final 10 games of the season.

For his part, Joseph is a bigger-bodied 6-foot-1 guard who uses his frame well and penetrates the paint with a slower, more deliberate style. I like him best as a passer, where he can hit his rollers and kickout passes at a solid level.

More than that, he does two things well. First, he knocks down shots off the catch, using his smooth lefty stroke to knock down 37.9 percent of his 3s over his career. Second, Joseph is a tough defender; while Miami’s defense as a whole was pretty bad, I thought Joseph generally brought it on the ball.

Teams shouldn’t want Joseph to be their primary initiator, but his defense, passing and shooting should scale up well for teams who already have a primary playmaker. I like him as a third guard next year for a good team.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

The Friars have a lot to replace in the backcourt, including Devin Carter, the Big East Player of the Year who did everything on both ends for them. Joseph certainly won’t fill in everything that Carter brought, but his two-way presence will help account for Carter’s loss to the NBA.

In addition to Carter, Providence also has to replace Ticket Gaines on the wing and the defensive energy Garwey Dual brought off the bench. That’s more than 80 minutes per game they need to make up — essentially two full positions. The Friars are getting Bryce Hopkins back from his ACL tear, but they certainly needed to add more depth. Joseph helps there.

Providence still needs one more significant guard, ideally one who makesmore of an impact than Joseph. But nabbing Joseph is a strong start to the process of replacing Carter. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 210

Crews’ path is well-worn at this point. He played for North Florida for two seasons, transferred down to the junior college level, then came back up to UT Martin. A first-team All-Ohio Valley Conference player this season, he averaged 19.1 points and eight rebounds per game to carry the Skyhawks to a tie for first place in the regular season.

Crews’ touch is his key skill. He drilled 41 percent of his nearly seven 3-point attempts per game and moves well without the ball. He scored a lot of points as a driver in the low-major OVC, but I’m skeptical he can duplicate that at higher levels. He doesn’t have a great first step or a particularly shifty game off the bounce. The best way to use him is to run him off screens or use his shooting gravity to space the floor for teammates.

His shooting makes him a starter at the high-major level.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 210

Crews’ path is well-worn at this point. He played for North Florida for two seasons, transferred down to the junior college level, then came back up to UT Martin. A first-team All-Ohio Valley Conference player this season, he averaged 19.1 points and eight rebounds per game to carry the Skyhawks to a tie for first place in the regular season.

Crews’ touch is his key skill. He drilled 41 percent of his nearly seven 3-point attempts per game and moves well without the ball. He scored a lot of points as a driver in the low-major OVC, but I’m skeptical he can duplicate that at higher levels. He doesn’t have a great first step or a particularly shifty game off the bounce. The best way to use him is to run him off screens or use his shooting gravity to space the floor for teammates.

His shooting makes him a starter at the high-major level.— Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Missouri went 0-18 in the SEC last season and shot just 30.4 percent from distance in conference play, so you can see why they need a player like Crews. He also should help on the defensive glass, where the Tigers were nothing short of a calamity this season. I don’t think Crews is the all-SEC-level talent the Tigers need, but he will certainly help them next season.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 220

Big wing shooters aren’t the easiest things to find in the portal. So when one becomes available, they’re worth ranking. A former top-100 recruit, Nickel committed to North Carolina out of high school but played sparingly as a freshman. He decided after last season to leave, and went to Virginia Tech, where he played well in what was largely a bench role. But by the end of the year, Nickel started to come on and showcase his value. He averaged 10 points and three rebounds over his final 11 games, shooting 46 percent from the field, 40 percent from 3 and 89 percent from the line. In total, he hit 39.9 percent from 3 on the season, and I’d bet he’s even more effective than that next season.

Nickel’s shot is beautiful, and he has a great sense of how to find those shots. He hunts them in transition by sprinting to the line or trailing right behind the ballhandler. He’ll spot up and relocate intelligently across the 3-point line to open up passing angles for his teammates. But more importantly, he’s a legit 6-foot-7 wing you can run off of movement and allow to fire. He’ll sprint off of screens and because he can shoot with a quick release and off of different variations of footwork, he can hit shots at a serious clip. He needs to keep improving on defense and needs to keep improving with the ball in his hands so that he can be a bit more effective attacking closeouts to keep defenders honest. But I would have bet on Nickel being a big-time guy for Virginia Tech next season.

He’s a great fit in Mike Young’s scheme, and I wonder if he’d consider returning. But regardless, for any team in need of a real shooter who will help your best players on offense purely by his mere presence on the floor due to how defenders have to stay attached to him, Nickel is a great option. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 220

Big wing shooters aren’t the easiest things to find in the portal. So when one becomes available, they’re worth ranking. A former top-100 recruit, Nickel committed to North Carolina out of high school but played sparingly as a freshman. He decided after last season to leave, and went to Virginia Tech, where he played well in what was largely a bench role. But by the end of the year, Nickel started to come on and showcase his value. He averaged 10 points and three rebounds over his final 11 games, shooting 46 percent from the field, 40 percent from 3 and 89 percent from the line. In total, he hit 39.9 percent from 3 on the season, and I’d bet he’s even more effective than that next season.

Nickel’s shot is beautiful, and he has a great sense of how to find those shots. He hunts them in transition by sprinting to the line or trailing right behind the ballhandler. He’ll spot up and relocate intelligently across the 3-point line to open up passing angles for his teammates. But more importantly, he’s a legit 6-foot-7 wing you can run off of movement and allow to fire. He’ll sprint off of screens and because he can shoot with a quick release and off of different variations of footwork, he can hit shots at a serious clip. He needs to keep improving on defense and needs to keep improving with the ball in his hands so that he can be a bit more effective attacking closeouts to keep defenders honest. But I would have bet on Nickel being a big-time guy for Virginia Tech next season.

He’s a great fit in Mike Young’s scheme, and I wonder if he’d consider returning. But regardless, for any team in need of a real shooter who will help your best players on offense purely by his mere presence on the floor due to how defenders have to stay attached to him, Nickel is a great option. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 190

A three-year starter at Charleston, Smith is one of the best shooters available in the portal. The 6-foot-2 guard is an absolute sniper. His 12.8 points per game may not look impressive, but Charleston’s scheme tends to spread the ball around.

The lefty has a smooth stroke using a sort of set shot that is easily repeatable. The Cougars played quickly under Pat Kelsey, so opponents were absolutely dead if they lost Smith in transition. But Smith can drill shots off ball-screens or dribble hand-offs when defenders go under, or by realigning himself in midair when running through off-ball picks. Kelsey even occasionally used Smith as a screener in creative 1-2 ball screens, popping Smith into wide open 3s. By the way, Smith can also spot up five feet behind the college 3-point line. He made 39.4 percent of his 3s this year, but those were high-degree-of-difficulty shots. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 190

A three-year starter at Charleston, Smith is one of the best shooters available in the portal. The 6-foot-2 guard is an absolute sniper. His 12.8 points per game may not look impressive, but Charleston’s scheme tends to spread the ball around.

The lefty has a smooth stroke using a sort of set shot that is easily repeatable. The Cougars played quickly under Pat Kelsey, so opponents were absolutely dead if they lost Smith in transition. But Smith can drill shots off ball-screens or dribble hand-offs when defenders go under, or by realigning himself in midair when running through off-ball picks. Kelsey even occasionally used Smith as a screener in creative 1-2 ball screens, popping Smith into wide open 3s. By the way, Smith can also spot up five feet behind the college 3-point line. He made 39.4 percent of his 3s this year, but those were high-degree-of-difficulty shots. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

It made a ton of sense for Smith to follow Kelsey to Louisville, as the scheme the Cardinals will run is perfect for a big-time shooter. Now, the question shifts to whether or not there is anyone from Louisville’s 2023-24 roster Kelsey wants to try to retain, and who else he might chase in the portal.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

Parker’s game should translate nicely to the high-major level. The leading scorer for Saint Louis this season, Parker’s game has some old-man qualities. He doesn’t have a ton of burst, but he’s crafty with his footwork and handle to separate from his man, particularly in ball-screens, where he knows how to use his body to keep his man in jail. Right when you think he’s about to attack, he’ll stop in the midrange and fire, or step back and drill a 3.

In averaging 15.9 points per game, Parker made 55 percent of his pull-up midrange jumpers, per Synergy. He only averaged one pull-up 3 per game, but hit those at a 42 percent clip in addition to his 40-percent mark on catch-and-shoot 3s.

There are complications. For one, he’s a ball screen guard that hasn’t displayed much passing skill yet. For another, it’s hard to overstate how little he defended this season. He also dealt with a foot injury this season that kept him in and out of the lineup.

But his scoring skills are serious enough that any team with a ball screen-centric offense should take a serious look at him. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 195

Parker’s game should translate nicely to the high-major level. The leading scorer for Saint Louis this season, Parker’s game has some old-man qualities. He doesn’t have a ton of burst, but he’s crafty with his footwork and handle to separate from his man, particularly in ball-screens, where he knows how to use his body to keep his man in jail. Right when you think he’s about to attack, he’ll stop in the midrange and fire, or step back and drill a 3.

In averaging 15.9 points per game, Parker made 55 percent of his pull-up midrange jumpers, per Synergy. He only averaged one pull-up 3 per game, but hit those at a 42 percent clip in addition to his 40-percent mark on catch-and-shoot 3s.

There are complications. For one, he’s a ball screen guard that hasn’t displayed much passing skill yet. For another, it’s hard to overstate how little he defended this season. He also dealt with a foot injury this season that kept him in and out of the lineup.

But his scoring skills are serious enough that any team with a ball screen-centric offense should take a serious look at him. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 185

Like many of the great Mid-American Conference guards available in the portal this season, Hill’s biggest strength is attacking the rim. The junior college transfer might be the most downhill-centric of the bunch, as he averaged nearly 10 shots at the rim per game for Bowling Green this season, per Synergy. Despite not possessing a lightning-quick first step, Hill seems to have a supernatural ability to navigate driving lanes and elude traffic to find the right little crease to get to the basket.

That skill enabled Hill to average 20.5 points, five rebounds, and 3.6 assists per game while shooting 44.3 percent from the field. Truth be told, Hill was just an average finisher for a guard, but made up for it by generating 6.4 free-throw attempts per game. Hill’s style served him well in the MAC, enabling him to earn a first-team all-conference honor.

His counters are less impressive. He tends to pull-up from the elbow as opposed to from 3, where he made just 28.9 percent of his attempts. His catch-and-shoot 3-point metrics weren’t much better, either.

Considering his shooting deficiencies, I’m worried about his game translating to higher levels. He’d need to find a team that can space the floor exceedingly well to facilitate his driving skill. They do exist, and it’s possible he finds one. But his success will depend more on his new team than it would for many of the other guards in the portal. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 185

Like many of the great Mid-American Conference guards available in the portal this season, Hill’s biggest strength is attacking the rim. The junior college transfer might be the most downhill-centric of the bunch, as he averaged nearly 10 shots at the rim per game for Bowling Green this season, per Synergy. Despite not possessing a lightning-quick first step, Hill seems to have a supernatural ability to navigate driving lanes and elude traffic to find the right little crease to get to the basket.

That skill enabled Hill to average 20.5 points, five rebounds, and 3.6 assists per game while shooting 44.3 percent from the field. Truth be told, Hill was just an average finisher for a guard, but made up for it by generating 6.4 free-throw attempts per game. Hill’s style served him well in the MAC, enabling him to earn a first-team all-conference honor.

His counters are less impressive. He tends to pull-up from the elbow as opposed to from 3, where he made just 28.9 percent of his attempts. His catch-and-shoot 3-point metrics weren’t much better, either.

Considering his shooting deficiencies, I’m worried about his game translating to higher levels. He’d need to find a team that can space the floor exceedingly well to facilitate his driving skill. They do exist, and it’s possible he finds one. But his success will depend more on his new team than it would for many of the other guards in the portal. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 185

A two-year starter at Mount St. Mary’s, Leffew took an enormous leap forward this season. Though he didn’t win MAAC Player of the Year, he had a real case as the best player in the conference this season. He averaged 17.6 points, 4.3 rebounds, 3.9 assists and 1.5 steals per game while drilling 36.5 percent of his nearly seven 3-point attempts per game.

Whereas Leffew largely fired off the catch last season, his off-the-dribble game exploded in 2023-24. In 2022-23, about 75 percent of Leffew’s 3s came off the catch. This season, his split of 3s off the catch and the dribble was about 50-50. His form is similar to Memphis Grizzlies wing Desmond Bane, in that it’s almost a set shot off the bounce that comes off his shoulder. He can get into his motion from almost any angle and with any footwork pattern.

Leffew also expanded his game off the bounce beyond just scoring. Mount St. Mary’s used him more as a primary ballhandler this year, and he blossomed in ball screens and as a live-dribble passer. He knows how to snake screens and find open areas, using his body to keep the defender in jail or step back into an open 3. His wasn’t especially efficient because he ended up having to create a lot of shots for his team, though a high major could improve that by downscaling his role.

He might fit better as a high-level backup than a starter, depending on his situation. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 185

A two-year starter at Mount St. Mary’s, Leffew took an enormous leap forward this season. Though he didn’t win MAAC Player of the Year, he had a real case as the best player in the conference this season. He averaged 17.6 points, 4.3 rebounds, 3.9 assists and 1.5 steals per game while drilling 36.5 percent of his nearly seven 3-point attempts per game.

Whereas Leffew largely fired off the catch last season, his off-the-dribble game exploded in 2023-24. In 2022-23, about 75 percent of Leffew’s 3s came off the catch. This season, his split of 3s off the catch and the dribble was about 50-50. His form is similar to Memphis Grizzlies wing Desmond Bane, in that it’s almost a set shot off the bounce that comes off his shoulder. He can get into his motion from almost any angle and with any footwork pattern.

Leffew also expanded his game off the bounce beyond just scoring. Mount St. Mary’s used him more as a primary ballhandler this year, and he blossomed in ball screens and as a live-dribble passer. He knows how to snake screens and find open areas, using his body to keep the defender in jail or step back into an open 3. His wasn’t especially efficient because he ended up having to create a lot of shots for his team, though a high major could improve that by downscaling his role.

He might fit better as a high-level backup than a starter, depending on his situation. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 185

Mallette is an intriguing eye-of-the-beholder player. On one hand, he’s a terrific shooter who drilled 38.2 percent of his 3s in his first season, then improved to 41.5 percent on five attempts per game this past season. Mallette has legitimate range that stretches beyond the college 3-point line.

However, he’s started to operate a lot more in the midrange area the last two years despite not being a good enough separator to make those shots consistently. He hit just 42 percent of his midrange jumpers this year, and many of those were tough looks. He also doesn’t finish well at the rim and is more of a score-first option than a playmaker for others. On top of that, he wasn’t particularly good at staying in front of his man on defense.

Whichever team gets Mallette should limit him to spacing the floor, attacking closeouts and running in transition. He should get up at least seven 3s per game instead of mixing those shots with midrange jumpers. They’ll also need to improve his defense, because he has a long way to go. But in the right role, he can be an effective high-major player. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 185

Mallette is an intriguing eye-of-the-beholder player. On one hand, he’s a terrific shooter who drilled 38.2 percent of his 3s in his first season, then improved to 41.5 percent on five attempts per game this past season. Mallette has legitimate range that stretches beyond the college 3-point line.

However, he’s started to operate a lot more in the midrange area the last two years despite not being a good enough separator to make those shots consistently. He hit just 42 percent of his midrange jumpers this year, and many of those were tough looks. He also doesn’t finish well at the rim and is more of a score-first option than a playmaker for others. On top of that, he wasn’t particularly good at staying in front of his man on defense.

Whichever team gets Mallette should limit him to spacing the floor, attacking closeouts and running in transition. He should get up at least seven 3s per game instead of mixing those shots with midrange jumpers. They’ll also need to improve his defense, because he has a long way to go. But in the right role, he can be an effective high-major player. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

It’s perfect on offense, so long as Mallette does not expect to be anything more than a floor spacer and off-ball player, Alabama loves players who can step into their scheme and spread the court for their guards. I’m worried about him defensively in the SEC, but he’s a solid first get in the transfer portal.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

White was a late transfer last season who surprisingly decided to leave USC after an impressive freshman season in which his modest production (nine points and five rebounds per game) belied his remarkable defensive versatility across multiple positions. At Louisville, White did basically the same thing on offense while strangely providing none of the defense that made him such an effective player at USC. I’m genuinely not sure what happened. His effort level wasn’t there regularly, particularly in transition defense. Maybe he was just a poor fit with Kenny Payne’s coaching style. But he needs to get back to the level he previously showed.

Offensively, White is largely a slasher and cutter who struggles to shoot the ball — though he actually made 36 percent of his spot-up 3s, per Synergy. He doesn’t have a monster first step, but he has long strides and a big, physical frame that defenders bounce off. He’ll typically try to shoot if his drive is aborted, but he only made 39 percent of his pull-up midrange shots this year, which isn’t good enough. Unless White can drastically improve as a shooter, he’s not a good enough offensive player to give the kind of defensive effort he gave this season.

Maybe a new coach will serve as a wake-up call. White is certainly talented enough to be a high-major starter for the next two years. But he won’t be one if the defense doesn’t return. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-7 Wt: 205

White was a late transfer last season who surprisingly decided to leave USC after an impressive freshman season in which his modest production (nine points and five rebounds per game) belied his remarkable defensive versatility across multiple positions. At Louisville, White did basically the same thing on offense while strangely providing none of the defense that made him such an effective player at USC. I’m genuinely not sure what happened. His effort level wasn’t there regularly, particularly in transition defense. Maybe he was just a poor fit with Kenny Payne’s coaching style. But he needs to get back to the level he previously showed.

Offensively, White is largely a slasher and cutter who struggles to shoot the ball — though he actually made 36 percent of his spot-up 3s, per Synergy. He doesn’t have a monster first step, but he has long strides and a big, physical frame that defenders bounce off. He’ll typically try to shoot if his drive is aborted, but he only made 39 percent of his pull-up midrange shots this year, which isn’t good enough. Unless White can drastically improve as a shooter, he’s not a good enough offensive player to give the kind of defensive effort he gave this season.

Maybe a new coach will serve as a wake-up call. White is certainly talented enough to be a high-major starter for the next two years. But he won’t be one if the defense doesn’t return. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 225

Anderson is one of the more interesting names in the portal. He was one of the more fun freshmen in college basketball this season. A legitimate 6-foot-9 floor-spacer with a shot that will translate at any level, Anderson averaged 14.5 points, 3.7 rebounds and 1.5 assists per game this season on his way to winning the Atlantic Sun Freshman of the Year award.

Anderson is an absolute gunner from distance. He drilled 38.1 percent of his nearly 200 3-point attempts, and will fire off hand-offs if teams go under, as a trailer in transition or off relocations lifting from the corner to the wing. He even occasionally hits shots off direct screening actions. His shot preparation is elite and he’s always ready to catch and fire when the opportunity comes.

The rest of his game needs some work. He needs to get tougher on the interior, become a better rebounder and improve his defense. But it’s exceptionally hard to find a forward this big with his shooting ability. If he was willing to come off the bench for a year as the rest of his game develops, a high major should get in the Anderson business. If he wants more immediate playing time, teams in the Mountain West or Atlantic-10 probably make the most sense for now.

Either way, Anderson is a player worth tracking, and has three years of eligibility still to come.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 225

Anderson is one of the more interesting names in the portal. He was one of the more fun freshmen in college basketball this season. A legitimate 6-foot-9 floor-spacer with a shot that will translate at any level, Anderson averaged 14.5 points, 3.7 rebounds and 1.5 assists per game this season on his way to winning the Atlantic Sun Freshman of the Year award.

Anderson is an absolute gunner from distance. He drilled 38.1 percent of his nearly 200 3-point attempts, and will fire off hand-offs if teams go under, as a trailer in transition or off relocations lifting from the corner to the wing. He even occasionally hits shots off direct screening actions. His shot preparation is elite and he’s always ready to catch and fire when the opportunity comes.

The rest of his game needs some work. He needs to get tougher on the interior, become a better rebounder and improve his defense. But it’s exceptionally hard to find a forward this big with his shooting ability. If he was willing to come off the bench for a year as the rest of his game develops, a high major should get in the Anderson business. If he wants more immediate playing time, teams in the Mountain West or Atlantic-10 probably make the most sense for now.

Either way, Anderson is a player worth tracking, and has three years of eligibility still to come.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-1Wt: 185

Wright transferred to Drake after spending three seasons at Cal-State Northridge, where he averaged 16.7 points per game as a junior. This season, Wright started every game as Drake marched to the Missouri Valley Tournament title and 28 wins. He was the second-leading scorer on the team, sharing his lead responsibilities with Missouri Valley Player of the Year Tucker DeVries.

Wright is a speedy, tough guard who can drive and accepts contact well enough to finish in the paint. He essentially played as an off-ball scorer last season, making 41 percent of his nearly five 3-point attempts per game. He’s always been more of a scorer than a passing point guard, so hewill need to share lead guard duties as he did last season. But he’s clearly a high-major player who can either work as the first guard off the bench or in a three-guard alignment like Drake used.

Wright’s coach, Darian DeVries, is moving to West Virginia, so it’ll be interesting to see if Wright follows. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1Wt: 185

Wright transferred to Drake after spending three seasons at Cal-State Northridge, where he averaged 16.7 points per game as a junior. This season, Wright started every game as Drake marched to the Missouri Valley Tournament title and 28 wins. He was the second-leading scorer on the team, sharing his lead responsibilities with Missouri Valley Player of the Year Tucker DeVries.

Wright is a speedy, tough guard who can drive and accepts contact well enough to finish in the paint. He essentially played as an off-ball scorer last season, making 41 percent of his nearly five 3-point attempts per game. He’s always been more of a scorer than a passing point guard, so hewill need to share lead guard duties as he did last season. But he’s clearly a high-major player who can either work as the first guard off the bench or in a three-guard alignment like Drake used.

Wright’s coach, Darian DeVries, is moving to West Virginia, so it’ll be interesting to see if Wright follows. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 170

Slajchert made second-team All-Ivy League this past season and has continued to improve over his time in college. After hitting 35 percent of his 3s over his first two seasons at Penn, Slajchert morphed into a lights-out shooter in 2023-24, making 42.2 percent of his 6.1 attempts per game. His shot takes a bit of time to get off, so I’m skeptical he’ll duplicate that percentage at high levels with longer opponents closing out on him. But he’s the kind of guy opponents certainly have to stay attached to on the perimeter. Slajchert also has a killer floater game and is generally effective from the court’s in-between areas.

The other good indicators are Slajchert’s big games against better conference opponents last season. He dropped 17 against Kentucky, 27 against St. Joe’s, 21 against Belmont and 33 against La Salle last season. As a sophom*ore, he scored 21 against Missouri, 20 against West Virginia, and 18 against St. Joseph’s.

More of a combo than a point guard, the Los Angeles-area native would fit on any number of West Coast schools who could use a knockdown shooter.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-1 Wt: 170

Slajchert made second-team All-Ivy League this past season and has continued to improve over his time in college. After hitting 35 percent of his 3s over his first two seasons at Penn, Slajchert morphed into a lights-out shooter in 2023-24, making 42.2 percent of his 6.1 attempts per game. His shot takes a bit of time to get off, so I’m skeptical he’ll duplicate that percentage at high levels with longer opponents closing out on him. But he’s the kind of guy opponents certainly have to stay attached to on the perimeter. Slajchert also has a killer floater game and is generally effective from the court’s in-between areas.

The other good indicators are Slajchert’s big games against better conference opponents last season. He dropped 17 against Kentucky, 27 against St. Joe’s, 21 against Belmont and 33 against La Salle last season. As a sophom*ore, he scored 21 against Missouri, 20 against West Virginia, and 18 against St. Joseph’s.

More of a combo than a point guard, the Los Angeles-area native would fit on any number of West Coast schools who could use a knockdown shooter.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 200

James should leave Louisville with his head held high as the only player to start every game of the infamous Kenny Payne era. A former four-star recruit who missed his first season due to an Achilles injury, James played with real effort and exhibited a phenomenal attitude through the program’s difficult times.

James drove and cut often to the rim in an attempt to get downhill, which resulted in him averaging nearly five free throws per game over his tenure. He also knocked down shots off while running baseline to baseline a reasonable amount of the time. He was more efficient as a freshman before experiencing a downturn as a sophom*ore, though he did average 12.6 points and five rebounds this season.

Honestly, I believe in James as a shooter and I believe in him working hard. Those qualities at least make him a rotation player at the high-major level.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 200

James should leave Louisville with his head held high as the only player to start every game of the infamous Kenny Payne era. A former four-star recruit who missed his first season due to an Achilles injury, James played with real effort and exhibited a phenomenal attitude through the program’s difficult times.

James drove and cut often to the rim in an attempt to get downhill, which resulted in him averaging nearly five free throws per game over his tenure. He also knocked down shots off while running baseline to baseline a reasonable amount of the time. He was more efficient as a freshman before experiencing a downturn as a sophom*ore, though he did average 12.6 points and five rebounds this season.

Honestly, I believe in James as a shooter and I believe in him working hard. Those qualities at least make him a rotation player at the high-major level.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 185

A small scoring guard, Sears is a two-time first-team All-OVC pick and a two-time All-OVC Tournament player. He’s a big-time shot creator who uses quick-twitch moves to get into the midrange and toward the rim, though I’m skeptical if those skills will translate to the next level. Sears made just 46.7 percent of his shots at the rim, 38 percent of his floaters and only 33 percent of his midrange jumpers, per Synergy, despite playing against the 328th-ranked strength of schedule in the country.

Sears actually thrived as a 3-point shooter this season, something he’d struggled with in the past. In his first three seasons in college, Sears made just 30.8 percent of his 3s. This season, that number spiked to 43.2 percent on nearly six attempts per game. His motion looks clean and he hasa quick release that allows him to get attempts off despite his size. He seemed to succeed most with relocation catch-and-shoot attempts, but also displayed an ability to make pull-ups going to either side. I believe in his shot coming up multiple levels; honestly, his makes are too pure.

Sears is good enough to play at a high major, though it’s unclear if his best role is as a starter or off the bench for an NCAA Tournament-quality team. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 5-11 Wt: 185

A small scoring guard, Sears is a two-time first-team All-OVC pick and a two-time All-OVC Tournament player. He’s a big-time shot creator who uses quick-twitch moves to get into the midrange and toward the rim, though I’m skeptical if those skills will translate to the next level. Sears made just 46.7 percent of his shots at the rim, 38 percent of his floaters and only 33 percent of his midrange jumpers, per Synergy, despite playing against the 328th-ranked strength of schedule in the country.

Sears actually thrived as a 3-point shooter this season, something he’d struggled with in the past. In his first three seasons in college, Sears made just 30.8 percent of his 3s. This season, that number spiked to 43.2 percent on nearly six attempts per game. His motion looks clean and he hasa quick release that allows him to get attempts off despite his size. He seemed to succeed most with relocation catch-and-shoot attempts, but also displayed an ability to make pull-ups going to either side. I believe in his shot coming up multiple levels; honestly, his makes are too pure.

Sears is good enough to play at a high major, though it’s unclear if his best role is as a starter or off the bench for an NCAA Tournament-quality team. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 205

It’s tough to be more traveled than Clark is at this point of his early basketball career. Clark went to four high schools, committed to Kentucky, then decommitted in March of 2022 before he was slated to attend. He chose to go to Illinois instead, where he started 12 early season games before taking a leave of absence and hitting the transfer portal prior to this season. Now, he enters the portal again following the firing of Kenny Payne.

More of a scoring guard than a distributor, Clark closed the season well for Louisville, averaging 14.5 points on 51.3 percent from the field and 45 percent from 3 over his last eight games. His 12-game stretch before that was miserable, as he averaged 9.5 points and shot just 34.2 percent from the field.

I think Clark is better suited to be an intriguing off-ball option than a ball-dominant point guard. He doesn’t have enough shake or explosiveness to break down defenders at a high level, but he’s confident as a shooter and has good instincts for generating open looks. He made 41.4 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s, and I think his shot looks clean. The issue is when he tries to do anything more with the ball; he made just 46.7 percent of his shots at the rim and just 28.1 percent of his pull-up 3s, per Synergy. It would really help him to move off the ball even more so he doesn’t have to worry about getting others involved.

Clark can be a scorer for a high major, but I don’t think his decision-making and ability to break down defenders is good enough to give him the ball as more than a secondary player. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 205

It’s tough to be more traveled than Clark is at this point of his early basketball career. Clark went to four high schools, committed to Kentucky, then decommitted in March of 2022 before he was slated to attend. He chose to go to Illinois instead, where he started 12 early season games before taking a leave of absence and hitting the transfer portal prior to this season. Now, he enters the portal again following the firing of Kenny Payne.

More of a scoring guard than a distributor, Clark closed the season well for Louisville, averaging 14.5 points on 51.3 percent from the field and 45 percent from 3 over his last eight games. His 12-game stretch before that was miserable, as he averaged 9.5 points and shot just 34.2 percent from the field.

I think Clark is better suited to be an intriguing off-ball option than a ball-dominant point guard. He doesn’t have enough shake or explosiveness to break down defenders at a high level, but he’s confident as a shooter and has good instincts for generating open looks. He made 41.4 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s, and I think his shot looks clean. The issue is when he tries to do anything more with the ball; he made just 46.7 percent of his shots at the rim and just 28.1 percent of his pull-up 3s, per Synergy. It would really help him to move off the ball even more so he doesn’t have to worry about getting others involved.

Clark can be a scorer for a high major, but I don’t think his decision-making and ability to break down defenders is good enough to give him the ball as more than a secondary player. — Sam Vecenie

How he fits

Clark’s fit with UCLA coach Mick Cronin will be quite interesting. The Bruins' backcourt was arguably its one strength last season, and Sebastian Mack, Jan Vide, Dylan Andrews and Will McClendon are all expected to be back next season. Each possesses lead guard capabilities; Mack, in particular, is a scoring guard whose skill set overlaps with Clark's.

On the other hand, UCLA struggles to get in graduate transfers and simply needs more talent after a down season by Cronin’s standards. Clark's body type and style of play is not too different from Troy Caupain, one of Cronin’s better players at Cincinnati. The question is whether Clark can keep improving to become a table-setter in addition to being a tough-shot maker.

— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

Pope is a terrific, versatile scorer who has finished top-five in the Big West in scoring each of the last two seasons. An off-guard scorer, Pope was responsible for a significant amount of the team’s offensive creation despite not exactly being a lead guard. He may possess the prettiest finger roll in all of college hoops.

Pope is constantly hunting for his own shot, whether in transition, in the pick-and-roll or flying off screens. He could score at all three levels in the Big West, countering his drives to the paint with short range shots, floaters and pull-up 3s. He’s not quite an elite shooter — he has a funky high release and wrist motion — but uses constant motion to keep defenders honest. He’s also quite strong, and seems to absorb contact well.

I’m a bit skeptical of his game translating to a high major unless he becomes an absolute flame thrower from distance. He may be best served going to a school in the Mountain West Conference, which offers a jump in competition, but not a significant enough one to force him to change his game. But high-major schools like Cal, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech and others who have reportedly reached out to him are also decent fits given their offensive schemes. I don’t think he’ll average 18 points per game at that level, but he could at least start at schools like those. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

Pope is a terrific, versatile scorer who has finished top-five in the Big West in scoring each of the last two seasons. An off-guard scorer, Pope was responsible for a significant amount of the team’s offensive creation despite not exactly being a lead guard. He may possess the prettiest finger roll in all of college hoops.

Pope is constantly hunting for his own shot, whether in transition, in the pick-and-roll or flying off screens. He could score at all three levels in the Big West, countering his drives to the paint with short range shots, floaters and pull-up 3s. He’s not quite an elite shooter — he has a funky high release and wrist motion — but uses constant motion to keep defenders honest. He’s also quite strong, and seems to absorb contact well.

I’m a bit skeptical of his game translating to a high major unless he becomes an absolute flame thrower from distance. He may be best served going to a school in the Mountain West Conference, which offers a jump in competition, but not a significant enough one to force him to change his game. But high-major schools like Cal, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech and others who have reportedly reached out to him are also decent fits given their offensive schemes. I don’t think he’ll average 18 points per game at that level, but he could at least start at schools like those. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 185

Davis had a rollercoaster career at Arkansas. The highs included him averaging 12.9 points, 4.9 rebounds, 2.4 assists and 1.3 steals while shooting 45 percent from the field and 41 percent from 3 over Arkansas’ final 21 games last season, where they made a run to the Sweet 16. Davis had 25 points in the team’s upset over Kansas and 16 in a win against Illinois. He also played 31 minutes per night in Arkansas’ Elite 8 run 2022. At his best, he was a tough defender who crawled into people’s space.

Having said that, he also experienced some real negative moments. His offense, and particularly his jump shot, was streaky. He left the team twice in the middle of his junior and senior seasons, returning after two days last season and a full week this season.

This season was tough for Davis, as he didn’t live up to the expectations placed upon him. He struggled to do much on offense, averaging just 5.9 points on 36.3 percent shooting. His defense was solid, but not as good as what it had been previously. He may simply need a change of scenery.

Few players in the portal have as much big-game success as Davis, so there will be interest. But teams will want to know why he left the Arkansas team twice over the last two years, as well as what exactly went wrong this season.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-4 Wt: 185

Davis had a rollercoaster career at Arkansas. The highs included him averaging 12.9 points, 4.9 rebounds, 2.4 assists and 1.3 steals while shooting 45 percent from the field and 41 percent from 3 over Arkansas’ final 21 games last season, where they made a run to the Sweet 16. Davis had 25 points in the team’s upset over Kansas and 16 in a win against Illinois. He also played 31 minutes per night in Arkansas’ Elite 8 run 2022. At his best, he was a tough defender who crawled into people’s space.

Having said that, he also experienced some real negative moments. His offense, and particularly his jump shot, was streaky. He left the team twice in the middle of his junior and senior seasons, returning after two days last season and a full week this season.

This season was tough for Davis, as he didn’t live up to the expectations placed upon him. He struggled to do much on offense, averaging just 5.9 points on 36.3 percent shooting. His defense was solid, but not as good as what it had been previously. He may simply need a change of scenery.

Few players in the portal have as much big-game success as Davis, so there will be interest. But teams will want to know why he left the Arkansas team twice over the last two years, as well as what exactly went wrong this season.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

Brown was one of the best young players in the America East Conference over the last two years, making the All-Freshman team last season before developing into a full-blown star within the league in 2023-24. He averaged 19 points, 7.6 rebounds and 2.6 assists while shooting 50.6 percent from the field and 35 percent from 3, although he didn’t draw fouls as much as one might expect.

His game is direct, almost to a concerning degree in terms of how well it translates to a higher level. Everything for Brown is in a straight line; his handle doesn't seem to have much shake. The good news: He’s a genuine three-level scorer who can post up smaller guards or play out of screens and hand-offs. He’s a threat to pull-up and score at a reasonable level from every point inside of 22 feet, and he made 35 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s.

But Brown's main goal is to get to the basket. He took more than seven shots at the basket per game and made them at a 68 percent clip, an absurd number for a guard. He’s tough and focused on the rim when driving, has good touch and even attacks the glass, averaging nearly three offensive rebounds per game. In transition, he can really load up off two feet and throw down above the rim.

I respect how hard Brown plays and believe he will rebound well no matter where he plays, but I’m skeptical that his scoring package will translate to the high-major level. Honestly, I’d love to see him in a conference more at the Atlantic-10 level next season to see how he looks there.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-3 Wt: 185

Brown was one of the best young players in the America East Conference over the last two years, making the All-Freshman team last season before developing into a full-blown star within the league in 2023-24. He averaged 19 points, 7.6 rebounds and 2.6 assists while shooting 50.6 percent from the field and 35 percent from 3, although he didn’t draw fouls as much as one might expect.

His game is direct, almost to a concerning degree in terms of how well it translates to a higher level. Everything for Brown is in a straight line; his handle doesn't seem to have much shake. The good news: He’s a genuine three-level scorer who can post up smaller guards or play out of screens and hand-offs. He’s a threat to pull-up and score at a reasonable level from every point inside of 22 feet, and he made 35 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s.

But Brown's main goal is to get to the basket. He took more than seven shots at the basket per game and made them at a 68 percent clip, an absurd number for a guard. He’s tough and focused on the rim when driving, has good touch and even attacks the glass, averaging nearly three offensive rebounds per game. In transition, he can really load up off two feet and throw down above the rim.

I respect how hard Brown plays and believe he will rebound well no matter where he plays, but I’m skeptical that his scoring package will translate to the high-major level. Honestly, I’d love to see him in a conference more at the Atlantic-10 level next season to see how he looks there.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 225

To call Cochran well-traveled would be an understatement. He started his career at Northern Illinois before departing after coach Mark Montgomery was fired. He moved to another MAC school in Ball State for a season, then left after another coach in James Whitford got fired. He then landed at Toledo for the last two seasons, gaining an extra year of eligibility by redshirting after missing a majority of the 2022-23 season with a toe injury. That means Cochran will be a sixth-year senior this coming season.

His 2023-24 season was his best yet. He won the co-Defensive Player of the Year award in the MAC, using his 220-pound frame, great hands and sense of disruption to stay in front of his man. He also averaged nearly two steals per game, and opponents really feel his presence on the perimeter.

Offensively, Cochran keeps improving. A second-team All-MAC selection this year, he averaged 14.4 points per game largely by filling in gaps and taking advantage of opportunities when they came to him. He attacked closeouts, cut off the ball toward the rim and sprinted out in transition to find easy buckets.

Cochran is all about energy. He’s not really a creator, nor is he a pick-and-roll guard. He can make 3s when left open, but by and large plays a direct game. I’m not sure how much of his offense translates to the high-major level, but he’s the type of player I’d want on my team. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-2 Wt: 225

To call Cochran well-traveled would be an understatement. He started his career at Northern Illinois before departing after coach Mark Montgomery was fired. He moved to another MAC school in Ball State for a season, then left after another coach in James Whitford got fired. He then landed at Toledo for the last two seasons, gaining an extra year of eligibility by redshirting after missing a majority of the 2022-23 season with a toe injury. That means Cochran will be a sixth-year senior this coming season.

His 2023-24 season was his best yet. He won the co-Defensive Player of the Year award in the MAC, using his 220-pound frame, great hands and sense of disruption to stay in front of his man. He also averaged nearly two steals per game, and opponents really feel his presence on the perimeter.

Offensively, Cochran keeps improving. A second-team All-MAC selection this year, he averaged 14.4 points per game largely by filling in gaps and taking advantage of opportunities when they came to him. He attacked closeouts, cut off the ball toward the rim and sprinted out in transition to find easy buckets.

Cochran is all about energy. He’s not really a creator, nor is he a pick-and-roll guard. He can make 3s when left open, but by and large plays a direct game. I’m not sure how much of his offense translates to the high-major level, but he’s the type of player I’d want on my team. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 215

This seems impossible, but Julien will be a seventh-year college basketball player next season. Originally a part of the 2018 recruiting class and the son of a former Louisiana player, Julien redshirted his first season after tearing his ACL in his left knee in high school. Then, during what was supposed to be his redshirt freshman season, he tore the ACL in his right knee and missed the rest of that season and all but the final four games of the following campaign. Then, one of his ensuing seasons was shortened due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He has only played three seasons of college hoops, so he has at least one year of eligibility left and could get a second if the NCAA allows players to get one for an additional medical redshirt.

Julien made the third-team All-Sun Belt as essentially a fourth-year freshman, then really broke out as a junior this past season. He dropped 17.3 points while shooting 45 percent from the field and getting to the free-throw line nearly five times per game, making second-team all-conference.

Julien is a big bowling ball of a wing/forward who uses a strong deceleration step to maneuver around rim protectors and rotating bigs around the basket. Beyond that, he can knock down shots off the catch and tends to make the open ones at a high level.

Julien will need to continue to convert jumpers and stay healthy. If he does, he could be a high-major starter, or, at the very least ,an impact bench player. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-6 Wt: 215

This seems impossible, but Julien will be a seventh-year college basketball player next season. Originally a part of the 2018 recruiting class and the son of a former Louisiana player, Julien redshirted his first season after tearing his ACL in his left knee in high school. Then, during what was supposed to be his redshirt freshman season, he tore the ACL in his right knee and missed the rest of that season and all but the final four games of the following campaign. Then, one of his ensuing seasons was shortened due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He has only played three seasons of college hoops, so he has at least one year of eligibility left and could get a second if the NCAA allows players to get one for an additional medical redshirt.

Julien made the third-team All-Sun Belt as essentially a fourth-year freshman, then really broke out as a junior this past season. He dropped 17.3 points while shooting 45 percent from the field and getting to the free-throw line nearly five times per game, making second-team all-conference.

Julien is a big bowling ball of a wing/forward who uses a strong deceleration step to maneuver around rim protectors and rotating bigs around the basket. Beyond that, he can knock down shots off the catch and tends to make the open ones at a high level.

Julien will need to continue to convert jumpers and stay healthy. If he does, he could be a high-major starter, or, at the very least ,an impact bench player. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 205

Derkack will be one of the most fascinating evaluations in the portal this season. The Northest Conference Player of the Year this season has an interesting game that is simultaneously well-rounded and flawed. Offensively, almost everything comes near the basket. He’ll occasionally throw down dunks, but he mostly finishes with below-the-rim layups. He doesn’t have much of an in-between game and doesn’t take a ton of pull-up 3s. All that makes him a funky fit, especially since the NEC does not have a positive record with players attempting to transfer up.

However, Derkack has great feel and is a fast processor of the game. He passes exceedingly well, having averaged nearly four assists per game. His handle is pretty loose and he had a number of sub-optimal ball-control and footwork turnovers this season, but once he gets to his spots, he can quickly dissect how defenders are playing him and make the right reads.

None of that accounts for the place he’ll make the biggest impact on a high-major school. Derkack won the NEC Defensive Player of the Year award and is an aggressive on-ball player with all sorts of toughness. He has great hands and good instincts for getting into passing lanes.

If Derkack wants a starting role, I think he’d be best in the Atlantic-10 or a similar-level conference. But I’d understand if a Big East or Big Ten team wanted him to add on-court toughness and leadership as a role player. — Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-5 Wt: 205

Derkack will be one of the most fascinating evaluations in the portal this season. The Northest Conference Player of the Year this season has an interesting game that is simultaneously well-rounded and flawed. Offensively, almost everything comes near the basket. He’ll occasionally throw down dunks, but he mostly finishes with below-the-rim layups. He doesn’t have much of an in-between game and doesn’t take a ton of pull-up 3s. All that makes him a funky fit, especially since the NEC does not have a positive record with players attempting to transfer up.

However, Derkack has great feel and is a fast processor of the game. He passes exceedingly well, having averaged nearly four assists per game. His handle is pretty loose and he had a number of sub-optimal ball-control and footwork turnovers this season, but once he gets to his spots, he can quickly dissect how defenders are playing him and make the right reads.

None of that accounts for the place he’ll make the biggest impact on a high-major school. Derkack won the NEC Defensive Player of the Year award and is an aggressive on-ball player with all sorts of toughness. He has great hands and good instincts for getting into passing lanes.

If Derkack wants a starting role, I think he’d be best in the Atlantic-10 or a similar-level conference. But I’d understand if a Big East or Big Ten team wanted him to add on-court toughness and leadership as a role player. — Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 185

A first-team All-Summit League selection this season, Omot is a slasher with all sorts of length. He likes to attack off the bounce, sizing up his defender at his own pace with hesitation dribbles before using his long strides to extend past his man and get to the rim.

He averaged 16.7 points and 4.2 rebounds this year, but wasn’t all that efficient and may have trouble traveling up levels. He wasn’t a particularly good shooter, hitting only 29.9 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s and only 23.1 percent of his pull-ups. In halfcourt settings, he only made 52.5 percent of his shots around the rim.

Omot is long and brings real defensive ability to the table on the wing. He’s a tough on-ball defender, and while he doesn’t force a ton of steals or block many shots, he is aggressive in making life tough for opposing wings. He fared as well as anyone defending Frankie Fidler this February and made him work equally hard in the Summit tournament.

Given offensive questions, Omot may be a better fit in a league like the American before trying to bounce upward the following season. But there will be high-major teams intrigued by his size, length and versatility off the bounce.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-8 Wt: 185

A first-team All-Summit League selection this season, Omot is a slasher with all sorts of length. He likes to attack off the bounce, sizing up his defender at his own pace with hesitation dribbles before using his long strides to extend past his man and get to the rim.

He averaged 16.7 points and 4.2 rebounds this year, but wasn’t all that efficient and may have trouble traveling up levels. He wasn’t a particularly good shooter, hitting only 29.9 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s and only 23.1 percent of his pull-ups. In halfcourt settings, he only made 52.5 percent of his shots around the rim.

Omot is long and brings real defensive ability to the table on the wing. He’s a tough on-ball defender, and while he doesn’t force a ton of steals or block many shots, he is aggressive in making life tough for opposing wings. He fared as well as anyone defending Frankie Fidler this February and made him work equally hard in the Summit tournament.

Given offensive questions, Omot may be a better fit in a league like the American before trying to bounce upward the following season. But there will be high-major teams intrigued by his size, length and versatility off the bounce.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 245

Despite averaging just 2.7 points and two rebounds in just nine minutes per game as a freshman, Nwoko has buckets of potential. At 6-foot-10 with a 7-foot-3 wingspan and a 240-pound frame, Nwoko is a legitimately explosive athlete. He plays hard, wants to dunk everything around the rim and gets easy lifts off either one foot or two. Unsurprisingly, he was at his best as an offensive rebounder and low-usage big, with shooting mechanics that at least looked comfortable in limited minutes even if the results weren’t there. But Nwoko is raw and his hands let him down from time to time.

He’s a project that could pay off in a big way down the road if he chooses the right school.— Sam Vecenie

Ht: 6-10 Wt: 245

Despite averaging just 2.7 points and two rebounds in just nine minutes per game as a freshman, Nwoko has buckets of potential. At 6-foot-10 with a 7-foot-3 wingspan and a 240-pound frame, Nwoko is a legitimately explosive athlete. He plays hard, wants to dunk everything around the rim and gets easy lifts off either one foot or two. Unsurprisingly, he was at his best as an offensive rebounder and low-usage big, with shooting mechanics that at least looked comfortable in limited minutes even if the results weren’t there. But Nwoko is raw and his hands let him down from time to time.

He’s a project that could pay off in a big way down the road if he chooses the right school.— Sam Vecenie

Stats

Ht: 6-0 Wt: 190